I know a lot of people are looking for some really good pictures of the antiglare film and see how much the quality is actually degraded. Enclosed are some HD pics that my roommate took next to his iphone without ANY screen protection. My thoughts: The quality is degraded (surprise it's antiglare, that's how it works so don't complain about it and compare it to the crystal clear because that's not what it is) but at the same time the feel is VERY similar to the same antiglare film for the iphone 3g/3gs. Also I was using my phone right after I had a nice greasy dinner and that's what the screen looks like. For me the deal breaker is the feel of the screen (for me). However I was really surprised how much the quality of the retina display is still retained. The question is just are you willing to sacrifice the quality for the antiglare feel/no fingerprints/antiglare. For me, I'm sold. Other comments: The protector is EXTREMELY easy to apply. I took 10 minutes and the adhesive back is split into several sections (not just halves) so that you can align one section and realign easily until its even and then apply the whole thing. I had ZERO problems with bubbles. Overall I think the loss in quality is worth it because I hate the feel of the naked glass, if you don't have a problem with it, go with the crystal film. That's the bottom line. I hope there isn't argument because it's kind of moot to keep saying you prefer the crystal. I'm just posting so that people like me (who prefer the antiglare) can see what it looks like before they buy.