Originally posted by UnixMac
I totally agree with that, OS X is why I'm not usning Windows XP today...
I disagree, there's no way that osX is as good as Windows ME. It's rock solid and pretty... best os, EVER.
Originally posted by UnixMac
I totally agree with that, OS X is why I'm not usning Windows XP today...
Originally posted by UnixMac
I based chip speeds on IBM's 970, which is now at 1.8 if I'm not wrong? So I figure in 6-8 months 2.2 should be achieved... maybe not, eitherway a Quad top end machine is a must for the serious workstation DV/Graphics customers...
***
I'm personally sick of being second best!
Originally posted by cr2sh
I disagree, there's no way that osX is as good as Windows ME. It's rock solid and pretty... best os, EVER.
Originally posted by UnixMac
Are you serious? DOS 6.1 vs BSD 4.4??
Windows ME? XP Pro, I'll debate you... ME??? I won't even waste my time.![]()
Originally posted by MacsRgr8
He's joking... take a look at his signature: if 6 were 9 (everything is the other way around)
Originally posted by UnixMac
The Mac line up should look something like this....
Originally posted by cr2sh
The 970 announcement will come in September, orders will begin then as well. With 970's shipping in time for the holidays. 2004 will be the year of the desktop.
Of course I was joking, but I thought I would have gotten flamed a little.. jeez.
Originally posted by scem0
Will apple support usb 2.0 like mac os rumors says? It seems like
if apple were to put usb 2 in their machines they would have done
so by now.