Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The HD3000 is (roughly) equivalent to a GeForce 320m. Very slightly inferior.

It should be fine to run Diablo. The processor is more than good enough.
 
I saw the list with the compatible graphics cards and Intel HD 3000 was there with a level of details "low".

I also read that Diablo 3 should be similar to Starcraft 2 in terms of graphics.
 
So the graphics seem good. I know the i5/i7 processors will do well, but what about the c2d 2010 airs. Think those will make the cut?
 
I'm keeping my fingers crossed for a beta invite to see if my 2011 Air will run it. I hardly play WoW or Starcraft 2 yet somehow manage to get into early rounds of every beta since Burning Crusade.
 
So the graphics seem good. I know the i5/i7 processors will do well, but what about the c2d 2010 airs. Think those will make the cut?

Since the requirements state a Core 2 Duo and the 320m is superior to the HD 3000 it will run fine.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; de-de) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

litchblade said:
Love to hear that, I just thought Im gonna play D3 on my ps3 :-D

Well, blizzard doesn't make console versions of its games ;-)

Good to see that my 8600m mbp from 2008 will also be able to run it on low settings. And it looks like I can expect max settings at 2560x1440 on my Mac Pro - like in sc2.

As for the mba, blizzard games love ram, so getting at least 4gb could definitely help.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.