Primary backup alternative-been burned by Time machine

Discussion in 'Mac Apps and Mac App Store' started by cuestakid, Oct 18, 2015.

  1. cuestakid macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Location:
    San Fran
    #1
    So I have been burned three times by Time Machine not cleaning up the local mobile backups on my various macs, and last night I had to do a full erase and install to get rid of the problem as a set of folders simply would not go away. I am beginning to strongly consider dumping time machine as my primary backup solution (I already pay for Crashplan's offsite online backup plan so I have a secondary solution in place). I have started a a trial of Carbon Copy Cloner and from the little I have seen it looks promising. My question to you all is has anyone else been able to move away from Time Machine as a primary backup and how has it worked out for you, or am I better off just sticking with Time Machine?

    Thanks!
     
  2. chscag macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Location:
    Fort Worth, Texas
    #2
    I would not entirely give up on Time Machine as it does have some advantages such as data migration to a new machine. I use both Time Machine and CCC on a regular basis in order to ensure data safety.
     
  3. Ebenezum macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2015
    #3
    I am using SuperDuper several years for bootable clones and it has worked very well. I also tested Carbon Copy Cloner but I started using SD because it has Sandbox feature which is missing from CCC (it allows easy testing of new OS versions without long cloning time in case of problems). I am not saying CCC isn't a fine software, it just isn't suitable for my needs.

    I have used Time Machine as a secondary backup but I am getting fed up with its problems (corrupted data, failure to backup data, etc.) If Apple improves Time Machines reliability I might consider using it but I am currently looking for a reliable replacement and QRecal might be a good option, I haven't tested it enough to be sure.
     
  4. CoastalOR macrumors 68000

    CoastalOR

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2015
    Location:
    Oregon, USA
    #4
    I like CCC. You can schedule when you want CCC to do backups, unlike being stuck with every hour on TM. CCC will also clone the Recovery partition. It is good to have a bootable clone that can get you back up in minutes. The clone can be used to migrate data to a new clean install when using Apple's Migration Assistant.
     
  5. old-wiz macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Location:
    West Suburban Boston Ma
    #5
    I use SuperDuper, but CCC is about the same. I backup on a rotating schedule to different external HDDs so that I always have at least 3 bootable backups, including 1 in a fireproof vault.
     
  6. simonsi macrumors 601

    simonsi

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2014
    Location:
    Auckland
    #6
    /\/\/\ This. Always cover yourself with multiple routes to a restore (backing up by itself is useless, its the restore capability you want).
     
  7. cuestakid thread starter macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Location:
    San Fran
    #7
    Is there any way to do CCC and Time Machine on a single backup drive, or would i need to get a separate drive to do this? If not, I suppose I will go back to Time machine. As I said I have my off site online backup plan with CrashPlan so i have a secondary solution
     
  8. simonsi macrumors 601

    simonsi

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2014
    Location:
    Auckland
    #8
    Assuming the drive is big enough, just partition it into two, one partition big enough for a CCC clone + any space you want to allow for the CCC Safetynet (i.e. some version protection on deleted files), and the rest for TM. Set CCC to run on drive connect or on a schedule and there you go.
     
  9. cuestakid thread starter macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Location:
    San Fran
    #9
    My drive is 1TB and since I only have around 180 or GB of data I figure splitting the drive in half will do, I will give CCC its 30 day trial and see how it goes.

    Thanks everyone!
     
  10. simonsi macrumors 601

    simonsi

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2014
    Location:
    Auckland
    #10
    Sounds fine.
     
  11. Fishrrman macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2009
    #11
    My vote goes to either CarbonCopyCloner or SuperDuper.

    Your chances of "being burned" with either of these are far, far less.

    You -do- have to think about running them (I've never attempted to set up an automated back with CCC, I just run it "manually" at regular intervals).

    Another advantage of a cloned backup is that it's FULLY bootable.
    That means that once you're backup up-and-running, you have "finder access" to EVERYTHING -- not the "limited options" you get when booted to a recovery partition.

    You won't appreciate the "fully bootable" concept until you get into an "I can't boot!" moment. THEN you'll find that -- compared to TM -- being able to boot "to the finder" is worth its weight in gold.
     
  12. Ebenezum macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2015
    #12
    While it is possible I don't recommend doing so because if your drive fails all backups are likely gone. If that isn't a problem you can partition it in two like simonsi said.
     
  13. simonsi macrumors 601

    simonsi

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2014
    Location:
    Auckland
    #13



    CCC Scheduled or run-on-connect works flawlessly for me...
     
  14. flashy-cat macrumors regular

    flashy-cat

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Location:
    UK
    #14
    I use a Synology 1515+ with a 4TB raid-1 volume, works a treat.

    IMG_0099.jpg
     
  15. ignatius345 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2015
    #15
    Same here. I do a monthly full clone of everything with CCC and keep the drives in a second location. Everything that changes a lot more frequently than that is caught by Dropbox and of course Time Machine.
     
  16. ericv macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2015
    #16
    I moved away from time machine after the 2nd time it said my backup was corrupt and has to create a new one. All that history gone. I now have a local backup to my NAS and remote backup to backblaze.
     
  17. grahamperrin macrumors 601

    grahamperrin

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    #17
    FreeNAS works well for Time Machine service. If you have ZFS snapshots of the file system where Time Machine stores its sparse bundle disk image, then if corruption occurs you can roll back to a point in time before that corruption.
     
  18. ericv macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2015
    #18
    I use FreeNAS. That is what I did the first time. However after the 2nd time I figured it wasn't worth it.
     
  19. Tech198 macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Location:
    Australia, Perth
    #19
    I have central backuped up NAS manually done, not automated.

    My own issues are aautomatic solutions are good, but my worry is always "what happens if it misses something, corruption etc..)

    I always backup manually over any automated approach, for this reason..... if something gonna happen, u wanna minimize any issues. than something that is always-running/backing up in the background..

    Convenient ya, but give me the hard work any-day. That way i can be sure what was copied was done right always, without hassle of making sure if something is there.. Plus, my time is worth more :D
     
  20. phrehdd macrumors 68040

    phrehdd

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    #20
    I have both NAS and DAS (directly attached external storage) for my systems. I have used both SD and CCC and find its just a matter of preference. Though I use my NAS for multiple purposes, I find that DAS works well with the above software and is a simple (and cheaper) way for those who simply want backups.
     

Share This Page