no, just install and run it. works great. I purchased via Mac appstoreIs it? You think Ubisoft is the feds or something? I find it pretty darn handy to continue my progress across all platforms.
no, just install and run it. works great. I purchased via Mac appstoreIs it? You think Ubisoft is the feds or something? I find it pretty darn handy to continue my progress across all platforms.
Wholeheartedly agreed 10x.Well Ubisoft has a pretty poor reputation. If they required an account to play a single player game I simply wouldn't buy it, even if it were useful as you pointed out. The other reason is that I am simply sick of the sheer number of logins and launchers required to play modern games. It makes the experience of launching the game take longer and adds roadblocks (finding passwords, fetching the phone for two-factor auth). My time is precious (the irony of using it to complain on macrumors is noted) and there are plenty of products that respect it.
Well you know what happens when people assume. Apple regularly modifies this for both small and large companies. Many large companies get special deals.That’s Apple’s standard cut. Just as it is Sony’s. No one knows if there is any specific agreement in either platform so they just assume it’s standard for both.
They’re pretty much all EOL and it isn’t Apple doing the game development.Apple: Oh don’t worry, we don’t have Intel Mac owners anymore
No, I was able to just jump into the game without any extra streps, no account creation etc.I’m interested as well…
Wow... $27.49 CAD ?
It's $54.99 CAD on PlayStation 5.
Is there a catch? It's absolutely worth it. It's been released this year. It sits at 86% on Metacritic and the user score agrees with that.
The catch is Sony isn’t getting a cut.
It doesn't help that the launchers are often buggy POS also. Blizzard's battle.net launcher is still an X86 app and often fails to do a fresh install of games (or even update them in some cases) and the less said about GoG Galaxy the better.The other reason is that I am simply sick of the sheer number of logins and launchers required to play modern games.
Blizzard was actually working hard to make some of their games work on Apple Silicon. Then Micro$oft bought them. Now it would be against their best interest to help promote a competitor like Apple. Don’t expect that launcher to be anything other than x86 for a long time.It doesn't help that the launchers are often buggy POS also. Blizzard's battle.net launcher is still an X86 app and often fails to do a fresh install of games (or even update them in some cases) and the less said about GoG Galaxy the better.
I very much doubt Microsoft would stop this. They make good quality office apps for macOS so I don’t see why they wouldn’t want to upgrade the battle net launcher. If we talk about gaming they made some Xbox games compatible with PlayStation so I don’t see how this is differentBlizzard was actually working hard to make some of their games work on Apple Silicon. Then Micro$oft bought them. Now it would be against their best interest to help promote a competitor like Apple. Don’t expect that launcher to be anything other than x86 for a long time.
Microsoft will only do what they really have to do when it comes to Apple/macOS. Their productivity tools were on macOS before even Windows was that big. Taking them away would be bad, but they've always lagged behind on functionality.I very much doubt Microsoft would stop this. They make good quality office apps for macOS so I don’t see why they wouldn’t want to upgrade the battle net launcher. If we talk about gaming they made some Xbox games compatible with PlayStation so I don’t see how this is different
I literally bought this game for $15 the other day on PS5, lol. This pricing is all on Ubisoft.The catch is Sony isn’t getting a cut.