Originally posted by uhlawboi80
Roe v. Wade was neither strengthened nor weakened by this ruling.
agreed. the point i was making is what was implied by what thomas wrote in his dissenting opinion.
they would have to remove abortion as a privacy right
and that's what thomas said: the constitution doesn't provide that privacy right.
and screw with more than 50 years of jurisprudence
well, bush undid 200+ years of non-aggression pretty easily...
it's clear to me that the neocons want to overturn roe v. wade. what's the easiest way to do that?