Processor Speed Comparison

Discussion in 'MacBook' started by ManhattanPrjct, May 23, 2009.

  1. ManhattanPrjct macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    #1
    In thinking about the possibility of a new MacBook I was comparing my prior generation MacBook to what is currently on offer today, and I was stymied when comparing processors:

    Today's basic processor:

    Intel Core 2 Duo
    2.0GHz
    1066MHz frontside bus
    3MB shared L2 cache

    Mine:

    Intel Core 2 Duo
    2.16GHz
    667MHz frontside bus
    4MB shared L2 cache

    I've already tricked it out last year (as opposed to buying a new system) by maxing the RAM at 2GB and putting in a 500GB hard drive for photo editing/storage and media storage.

    Is there some trial out there that compares these two processors?
     
  2. xraydoc macrumors demi-god

    xraydoc

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2005
    Location:
    192.168.1.1
    #2
    The speeds will be very comparable - the new one will likely have the edge over the old, but not by much. Certainly not enough to justify the cost of upgrading just to gain a 5% speed boost.

    If your current machine is doing what you want and doing it well, no need to replace it.

    And, if you have the 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo with the Intel GMA 950 graphics unit, your machine can be upgraded to 3GB of RAM (unsupported by Apple officially, but it works).
     
  3. ManhattanPrjct thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    #3
    I do have that graphics unit - what configuration of memory would get it to 3GB, my 1GB DIMM with a 2GB in the other slot? Are there any complications from doing this?
     
  4. NewMacbookPlz macrumors 68040

    NewMacbookPlz

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    #4
    That would be the setup. The "complication" would be the loss of dual-channel support, but generally more RAM overcomes the performance hit that the loss of dual-channel memory support comes with.
     

Share This Page