You don’t have to take musical lessons to use them.I’m not seeing one single advantage to these Bongo buttons
iPhone is already water resistant.Great write-up. Still don't see why Apple needs to over engineer this replacement of traditional buttons for minor improvements in water-resistance, etc.
touch ID was haptic, it was great. I am sure they have great ideas on how to use these buttons. May be touch ID and haptic button combined into one. Larger surface area for touch ID ?Capacitive would be bad. It needs to be a system that can measure pressure. Capacitance can jump small gaps without a touch. Apple will not do this.
Touch ID was not usable with gloves because it can't read finger prints, not becasue of haptic button.In what universe is a haptic volume button innovative?
Anyway, glad it didn’t make it to the iPhone 15 is all I have to say. The haptic home button was bad enough - constantly malfunctioning in the cold/heat/impossible to use with gloves/etc.
Designers from California really have a hard thinking about how anyone else in the world lives…well if the likes of Apple & Tesla are representative anyway…
They have to get rid of Face ID to remove cutout.I honestly think they should spend that R&D money on trying to eliminate the front camera cutout (notch, dynamic island). I appreciate that Apple is trying to improve the camera, but man those lens are very big. I hope they find ways to minimize the back camera cutout while still retaining the same quality. Of course, give people the option to still have the dynamic island (remember, it's just software). Getting rid of the physical buttons should be the last thing on the list.
Yeah, and the Action button is nothing but a massive downgrade for me. The ability to check that my phone sound is muted simply by feel, is a lovely feature.I’m not seeing one single advantage to these Bongo buttons
Capacitive haptic buttons makes no sense. Good luck pushing those buttons with gloves in the winter or imagine sweaty or greasy fingers.
1. It doesn't improve waterproofing. Physical buttons can easily be sealed completely.So creating something that will improve waterproofing, provide more accurate feedback
1. They’re still moving parts, and therefore more prone to reduce waterproofing overtime. No entry point will be always more waterproof.1. It doesn't improve waterproofing. Physical buttons can easily be sealed completely.
2. Different designs of haptic feedback can provide different levels of feedback. But they can never provide "more accurate feedback" than physical buttons.
Touch ID was not usable with gloves because it can't read finger prints, not becasue of haptic button.
Great write-up. Still don't see why Apple needs to over engineer this replacement of traditional buttons for minor improvements in water-resistance, etc.
Agreed. Seems like a big waste of R&D time and money for a feature that nobody really cares about.
It is nothing but tutti-fruitti, phoney baloney, plastic banana, good time rock-n-roll Apple PR “leaks.” Apple did not redesign the iPhone after EVT failures with the Bongo design. The iPhone design was locked-in months ago and this was just one of the multiple versions Apple trials. The same thing happened a year or two before Apple released the “Plus” models. Apple PR started leaking things, leading to stories about “iPhone Math.”As an engineer, this article strikes me as oddly specific. It seems someone wanted to show off their info instead of writing a good article.
Also, I'm glad Apple didn't do it. As long as they don't have a concept to use this button as a more dynamic input device it offers only disadvantages to the user.
I imagine this isn't for a sort of direct user "feature" but rather for durability (mechanical button failure, dust intrusion, water intrusion).I’m not seeing one single advantage to these Bongo buttons