That’s the contradiction that stands out to me:
Apple promotes itself as environmentally conscious, remember the whole Mother Nature skit during the iPhone event? but then makes decisions like this that push perfectly functional devices into obsolescence.
By ending support for the older Home architecture in 2025, they’re essentially forcing users to upgrade not just the Home app, but potentially entire devices if they’re running older iOS/macOS versions. That includes older iPads or Macs people might still use as HomeKit hubs. So what happens to those? They get tossed or shelved, not exactly eco-friendly.
It feels like the drive for performance and ecosystem control is overriding their sustainability message. It’s not just about updating software anymore, it’s about making sure all your devices are new enough to stay in the loop.
That’s a lot of e-waste.
Apple promotes itself as environmentally conscious, remember the whole Mother Nature skit during the iPhone event? but then makes decisions like this that push perfectly functional devices into obsolescence.
By ending support for the older Home architecture in 2025, they’re essentially forcing users to upgrade not just the Home app, but potentially entire devices if they’re running older iOS/macOS versions. That includes older iPads or Macs people might still use as HomeKit hubs. So what happens to those? They get tossed or shelved, not exactly eco-friendly.
It feels like the drive for performance and ecosystem control is overriding their sustainability message. It’s not just about updating software anymore, it’s about making sure all your devices are new enough to stay in the loop.
That’s a lot of e-waste.