Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple is not an average joe cloud customer. Apple probably just leases (a crapton of) bare hardware and has their own admins on site managing it.
You think Google is going to let Apple put engineers in their data centers? Come on, I know "Google bad, Apple good" but that level of mental gymnastics causes synapse cramps.
 
Wait until you see how much data is linked to you from this "wholesale collection" app :p


View attachment 2194366
To be fair, Apple Music is also a music store with social media features and provides personalized music recommendations. It needs to collect/store most of these kinds of info since it literally needs them to function. An authenticator app should require none of these things. If you look at Apple apps that don't need these data and compare them with similar apps in the same category, Apple's data collection is typically minimal.

For example,

Apple Mail:

img_1190-jpg.2194415


Versus Gmail:

IMG_1189.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1190.jpg
    IMG_1190.jpg
    436.6 KB · Views: 3,952
Last edited:
You think Google is going to let Apple put engineers in their data centers? Come on, I know "Google bad, Apple good" but that level of mental gymnastics causes synapse cramps.

Has nothing to do with good or bad...
As the top customer, bringing in billions, you can demand a lot, including special treatment. Having your own people on site may be one of those things, but I don't know, maybe a data center specialist reading this can enlighten us if thats a possibility or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn and KeithBN
backdoors for certain entities and data gathering to generate revenue.
That can be the only reason that I see. I expect that after the Apple VS FBI thing a few years ago, national security letters have been written to all tech companies and we'll not see additional end to end encryption from any of them.

This is why it is so important to get side-loading. So smaller or open source entities can provide what is prohibited from the government.
 
You think Google is going to let Apple put engineers in their data centers? Come on, I know "Google bad, Apple good" but that level of mental gymnastics causes synapse cramps.
That's not how any of this stuff works. Larger customers like Apple typically will run they own systems on top of Azure, AWS, Google Cloud etc. They are most likely not relying on the built-in tools created by cloud providers and are mainly purchasing compute and data storage capacities. And no, this doesn't necessarily need to involve special treatment (though Apple probably gets some given their size).
 
That can be the only reason that I see. I expect that after the Apple VS FBI thing a few years ago, national security letters have been written to all tech companies and we'll not see additional end to end encryption from any of them.

This is why it is so important to get side-loading. So smaller or open source entities can provide what is prohibited from the government.
I don't see how that has anything to do with side loading. A lot of password /2FA apps on the App Store that has cloud syncing are end-to-end encrypted, not to mention iCloud Keychain has always been as well. Apple also recently added end to end encryption for the rest of iCloud as well, so it's definitely not prohibited (although I'm sure companies are getting push back from intelligence agencies when they do make these features).
 
They are most likely not relying on the built-in tools created by cloud providers and are mainly purchasing compute and data storage capacities.
Thats what I meant with leasing bare hardware. I just cannot imagine some Apple employee sitting at a desk in Cupertino, opening up the Google Drive webapp, selecting a bunch of iCloud folders and clicking upload 😄
 
  • Haha
Reactions: szw-mapple fan
Where exactly does Google store the backups? At least with Microsoft Authenticator, you can backup/sync to iCloud. Too bad Google Authenticator doesn't do the same, but I suppose that wouldn't be very Google-like of them.

It's also a bit unfortunate that a lot of companies (i.e. Nintendo) say to use Google Authenticator for 2FA...as if that's the only solution out there. There are plenty of other apps that will work with 2FA, but some people just don't know any better.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: xpxp2002
Thats what I meant with leasing bare hardware. I just cannot imagine some Apple employee sitting at a desk in Cupertino, opening up the Google Drive webapp, selecting a bunch of iCloud folders and clicking upload 😄
You never know. Maybe Apple engineers falling asleep while dragging and dropping folders is why we have iCloud downtimes :p
 
I work with Google's cloud at work (AWS and Azure, too). Google's cloud has waaaay too many insecure defaults for me. Their security layer (IAM / identity and access management) is a toy compared to other cloud providers. Personally, hard pass on anything from Google. They just aren't serious about security.

I feel the exact opposite, just look at how many breaches have happened with aws customers! if aws had better default security policies most of those wouldnt have happened, I would much rather trust my data on GCP then any other cloud.
 
WTF. This is not acceptable at all. How is this such a small announcement? Many organizations rely on GCP for authentication and this shows a recklessness I would be nervous about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: szw-mapple fan
I'm going to urge people away from the closed source Authy and towards 2FAS, Aegis Authenticator, or Raivo OTP.

Authy doesn't even offer a way to export, though I hear there's a hack for that. That alone should make people nervous.

echoing this. I switched to raivo a year or two ago and haven't looked back. Can't recommend it enough
 
  • Like
Reactions: rhett7660
Oohhh
Shocking! /s

This, along with the privacy scorecard, makes this a hard pass.

View attachment 2194342


Keep in mind, this is an authenticator app, what could it possibly need all that identifiable data for besides wholesale collection? This is basically spyware!

Ooh, didn’t know that. Time to switch services, I think!

Shame the Keychain GUI is so “un-Apple”. I hope they make it a more useful and user-friendly app soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: icanhazmac
No one should trust LastPass at this point.
Been using them for many years, without trouble (yes, I know they were hacked, more than once, and their PBKDF2 defaults were too weak - something I fixed on my account from day one). Hopefully now they're out from the GoTo shackles, that mess can be cleaned up. Would I have gone with them had I known what I know now, but it was between them and 1Password and the latter didn't have the features I wanted at the time.

Back on topic, thanks for the PSA, I'm currently using multiple 2FA apps. No idea why! Must consolidate (away from Google, probably).
 
The new prison for dangerous convicts had no locks or doors.

In a statement the governor of the new prison said ’for convenience, we opened the prison early and started putting the prisoners in their cells. But don’t worry, locks and doors and cameras and all sorts of nice stuff is still on the way!’
 
  • Like
Reactions: videosoul
That response from Google is appalling... and also typical corporate refusal to take responsibility for anything, pushing the responsibility onto unsuspecting users by calling it a "convenience" feature.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.