Maybe not fixing bugs is part of their sales strategy. Maybe the large appliance makers ( like refrigerators etc. ) will adopt the same strategy as internet is implemented in their products. Just a reminder that IoT can have additional costs beyond the purchase. Another industry taking advantage is HVAC. Many manufacturers force the homeowner to buy their proprietary “communicating” thermostats and they are expensive( one manufacturer allows standard thermostats even on their 20 SEER variable speed units but they are the exception)Super dumb they released a statement and didn't bother to even try to fix the issue.
Yours is more advanced than mine 🤣Absolutely!
We have three mechanical timer light switches that turn on and off lights at designated times during the week. They are literally mechanical devices that you install on top of your mechanical switches. These mechanical devices have a small timer device than physically turn on and off the light switch. It's not internet connected.
Every now and then I think of replacing them with a smart version only because one of the mechanical devices seem to start failing a bit. Unfortunately, these devices as ingenious as they are, are not popular and the version we have is no longer made.
We have this: https://www.amazon.com/SWE-82000-AutoChron-Switch-Timer/dp/B003VW2LA6
And we also have this: https://www.homedepot.com/p/Woods-I...al-Light-Switch-Timer-White-59744WD/203638998
The first one by AutoChron is a much better device than the Woods. AutoChron has many more ways to program the On and Off and has better manual override than the Woods. Don't know what I'll do when the AutoChron ones we have die. These "dumb" devices are so suitable for what we need -- just turning on and off the light to either simulate that we're at home, or to light the outdoors during the night.
Hacker can attack your devices on your network from inside your network. Hacker can perform denial of service attack using your device.Yeah, they might switch your lamp on and off to annoy you![]()
It doesn’t give them full access, or really any access, to “the devices on the network”. If that were the case, any visitor using your wifi has full acchess to your computer, which is not the case.
Sure, devices with no security, maybe.
Blowing up a “requires physical access” vulnerability like this isn’t the way to go either. Especially for a respectable security company. Guess that tells us all we need to know about this one.Downplaying vulnerabilities like this isn't the way to go.
That’s… one way to respond. I wish Belkin the best of luck getting future business from anyone who reads that, lol. 😂Belkin told Sternum that it has no plans to update the Wemo Mini Smart Plug V2 because it is at the end of its life after four years and has been replaced with newer models.