Ha! My mom used to watch that soap opera religiously. Are soap operas still a thing?
I think you may be conflating the two cases. Apple already lost the German case. They are going to appeal. To enforce the ban, QC had to put up that $1.3B security bond, payable to Apple if Apple wins on appeal. So yes.
The N. California and German cases have no bearing on each other. The ban did apply after the verdict.
Your pragmatism kinda ruins
@Skeptical.me's joke about the venerable soap opera Days of Our Lives. Knock it off.

The question remains why does Apple customers or in this case forum members care if there is a lawsuit, why post it in the main page.
Recommendation to post it in a separate legal section if one is interested. It’s like the Apple vs. Samsung case that went on for years, why do I care of the outcome. This is part of business, what next MacRumors posts an article of how much toilet paper the Apple Campus 2 uses on a daily, weekly, yearly basis. Get real, post this stuff in its own section for those interested and have no direct involvement on any of the outcome.
Most people come here for interesting news on Apple products and services that “directly” effects their usage and business. How does some common licensing spat between two corporations affect these users daily lives. Big deal product is not available in a certain country, there are other legal methods to get that model or buy something else. Life goes on.
[doublepost=1548983194][/doublepost]
Hasn't this already been proven false. Actually was getting a steeper discount than others?
Do you really care about what every component in your phone, computer, car, software licensing deals cost. If you do great, if not the multitude of details does not effect 99% of users.
This is not done class action relating to user privacy, battery, or some other defect. This is corporate to corporate business, do you think QualComm cares if you as an Apple customer gets 5Mb for more or less speed compared to another vendors tech. No their care about their own corporate concerns; unless this case directly involves you, I recommend posting it to a specialized section as “legal”.
[doublepost=1548983499][/doublepost]
Please tell me you're joking with this. Nothing you wrote is true. It doesn't even resemble anything going on in this dispute, which is sad because there's no shortage of accurate information about the issue. It's like you're trying to mimic your tagline.
It’s humour, and whatever information is available for the public to see is not the entire story. It’s a he said she said for what the public sees, there is a reason why certain details are only available during trials.
If a case has an appeal, it is exercising ones right under the law. There have been false convictions multiple times in the past and may continue into the future. It is not as simple as one believes what is being openly reported.