Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think this is what happened:

Apple had Qualcomm chips inside their iPhones (actually they still do in older iPhones), Apple paid for those chips including all IP licences, now, Apple didn't want to pay the prices Qualcomm was asking so they stopped paying, Apple wants to pay for those licences but Qualcomm won't licence them without also buying their chips.
If this is the case what can Apple do, yes, they are infringing cause those IP rights are in most of their iPhones but shouldn't Qualcomm provide Apple those IP rights (by paying a fee) without Apple buying chips?!
 
QualComm please just go away you are a disgrace and have burned your bridge Apple was smart to cut ties with you (Never Bite The Hand That Feeds)
 
I doubt Apple is just flat out ignoring anything. They probably believe they have followed the law.

At any rate, QCOM is stupid to continue messing with Apple. Apple is going to move on and QCOM will have their patent portfolio without a large customer.
 
Maybe, but I’m more inclined to believe that China would be closer to enforcing the ban there if it supported their efforts with the ongoing trade war with the US.

I'm more inclined to see China's reaction to all things Apple if the iPad Mini 5 is actually produced in Taiwan as reported. ;)
 
Nope! I wouldn't be wasting my time here posting if I work for such thing. I could do more productive somewhere else not in here if involved in decision making for a big company like Apple and Qualcomm. Sorry, bud!

Just checking, it’s like a disagreement between a couple and you as a friend of one of the party takes a side, not knowing any of the details. To me it just seems premature and has nothing to do with the customer until a court trail decision has been made, that may effect future cost of Apple products and/or services by cents. In the broad scheme of things it’s net effect on any of Apple customers is very minor, non observable in reality.
 
Screw Qualcomm. Once Apple designs it's own chips completely they won't need anyone else except contract makers like TMSC, Hon Hai (Foxconn) and Hemlock.

That's the issue, Apple could easily make their own, but they can't because they don't own any of the Patents.
 
Ha! My mom used to watch that soap opera religiously. Are soap operas still a thing?


I think you may be conflating the two cases. Apple already lost the German case. They are going to appeal. To enforce the ban, QC had to put up that $1.3B security bond, payable to Apple if Apple wins on appeal. So yes.


The N. California and German cases have no bearing on each other. The ban did apply after the verdict.


Your pragmatism kinda ruins @Skeptical.me's joke about the venerable soap opera Days of Our Lives. Knock it off. :p:D

The question remains why does Apple customers or in this case forum members care if there is a lawsuit, why post it in the main page.

Recommendation to post it in a separate legal section if one is interested. It’s like the Apple vs. Samsung case that went on for years, why do I care of the outcome. This is part of business, what next MacRumors posts an article of how much toilet paper the Apple Campus 2 uses on a daily, weekly, yearly basis. Get real, post this stuff in its own section for those interested and have no direct involvement on any of the outcome.

Most people come here for interesting news on Apple products and services that “directly” effects their usage and business. How does some common licensing spat between two corporations affect these users daily lives. Big deal product is not available in a certain country, there are other legal methods to get that model or buy something else. Life goes on.
[doublepost=1548983194][/doublepost]
Hasn't this already been proven false. Actually was getting a steeper discount than others?

Do you really care about what every component in your phone, computer, car, software licensing deals cost. If you do great, if not the multitude of details does not effect 99% of users.

This is not done class action relating to user privacy, battery, or some other defect. This is corporate to corporate business, do you think QualComm cares if you as an Apple customer gets 5Mb for more or less speed compared to another vendors tech. No their care about their own corporate concerns; unless this case directly involves you, I recommend posting it to a specialized section as “legal”.
[doublepost=1548983499][/doublepost]
Please tell me you're joking with this. Nothing you wrote is true. It doesn't even resemble anything going on in this dispute, which is sad because there's no shortage of accurate information about the issue. It's like you're trying to mimic your tagline. :rolleyes:

It’s humour, and whatever information is available for the public to see is not the entire story. It’s a he said she said for what the public sees, there is a reason why certain details are only available during trials.

If a case has an appeal, it is exercising ones right under the law. There have been false convictions multiple times in the past and may continue into the future. It is not as simple as one believes what is being openly reported.
 
Nature of business, nothing new. How does this affect your daily personal life, only minor if you are a shareholder and even then most are awaiting a formal trial if need be.

All I meant, in a jovial manner, is that this is just another drama. One I honestly couldn't care less about. So, maybe you missed the memo.
 
The question remains why does Apple customers or in this case forum members care if there is a lawsuit, why post it in the main page.

Recommendation to post it in a separate legal section if one is interested. It’s like the Apple vs. Samsung case that went on for years, why do I care of the outcome. This is part of business, what next MacRumors posts an article of how much toilet paper the Apple Campus 2 uses on a daily, weekly, yearly basis. Get real, post this stuff in its own section for those interested and have no direct involvement on any of the outcome.

Most people come here for interesting news on Apple products and services that “directly” effects their usage and business. How does some common licensing spat between two corporations affect these users daily lives. Big deal product is not available in a certain country, there are other legal methods to get that model or buy something else. Life goes on.
[doublepost=1548983194][/doublepost]

Do you really care about what every component in your phone, computer, car, software licensing deals cost. If you do great, if not the multitude of details does not effect 99% of users.

This is not done class action relating to user privacy, battery, or some other defect. This is corporate to corporate business, do you think QualComm cares if you as an Apple customer gets 5Mb for more or less speed compared to another vendors tech. No their care about their own corporate concerns; unless this case directly involves you, I recommend posting it to a specialized section as “legal”.
[doublepost=1548983499][/doublepost]

It’s humour, and whatever information is available for the public to see is not the entire story. It’s a he said she said for what the public sees, there is a reason why certain details are only available during trials.

If a case has an appeal, it is exercising ones right under the law. There have been false convictions multiple times in the past and may continue into the future. It is not as simple as one believes what is being openly reported.

It appears to me if anyone here is making a big deal out something irrelevant, it is you.

Grab some friends, go to the local pub, have some dinner and a few beers. And relax. Or there's always Xanax :)
 
All I meant, in a jovial manner, is that this is just another drama. One I honestly couldn't care less about. So, maybe you missed the memo.

Memo received ;)
[doublepost=1548997417][/doublepost]
It appears to me if anyone here is making a big deal out something irrelevant, it is you.

Grab some friends, go to the local pub, have some dinner and a few beers. And relax. Or there's always Xanax :)

Are you spying on me? ;)

I was at the pub with friends having dinner when it was posted. :eek:

No medication required ;);)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skeptical.me
Well this could end today if Apple is willing to pay up now. Just wire transfer that extra single digit percentage from their cash and that would shut Qualcomm forever. :rolleyes:

That wishful thinking for these Qualcomm Crooks
Too bad for them, their bullying tactics don't quite work on Apple.
 
Ok...

Apple sold iPhones to third party sellers in Germany (T-Mobile, Vodafone, MediaMarkt, Saturn, Cyberport, Gravis and lots of other resellers).
Qualcomm got a decision from a court in Germany that Apple is not allowed to sell some iPhone models in their Apple stores, which Apple follows (as these older models are not sold anymore by Apple directly anymore).
Now Qualcomm wants to force Apple to not sell the already sold iPhones through the aforementioned third parties anymore.
But.... the iPhones are already sold and are now property of the third parties.
So in my eyes Qualcomm has to sue every third party seller to not sell these iPhones.

Just saying.... (and i might be incorrect)
 
I hope Apple eventually makes their own modems... and license it for free to any OEM that wants to use it just to kill QC.
 
QC can shove off.

License it for free? From apple? We all know this ain’t gonna happen.
Most definitely a cocky comment from Jeremy. I'm not sure what fantasy world he's living in when we all know Apple does nothing for free.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.