Qualcomm Now Seeks iPhone XS and iPhone XR Sales Ban in China as Legal Battle With Apple Intensifies

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by MacRumors, Dec 13, 2018.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Qualcomm plans to file for an injunction on the iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and iPhone XR in China, which would theoretically prevent the sale of those devices in the country, a lawyer for the company told the Financial Times today.

    [​IMG]

    Earlier this week, a Chinese court granted an injunction on older iPhone 6s through iPhone X models in China after it ruled that those devices violated two Qualcomm patents, and the chipmaker now plans to assert those same patents against the latest iPhones amid an escalating legal battle with Apple.

    The first Qualcomm patent reportedly enables users to "adjust and reformat the size and appearance of photos," while the second is said to relate to "managing applications using a touch screen when viewing and navigating apps."

    In a statement issued following the ruling earlier this week, Apple said all iPhone models remain available for customers in China:
    Apple has continued to sell the affected iPhone models in China because it believes the patent infringement ruling does not apply to iOS 12, leading Qualcomm to call on the Fuzhou Intermediate People's Court to enforce the injunction.

    Reports suggest that Qualcomm's latest efforts are an attempt to pressure Apple into settling a long-standing dispute between the two companies, primarily over chip-related licensing fees. Reports also suggest that the iPhone injunction could be politically motivated due to the ongoing US-China trade war.

    Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

    Article Link: Qualcomm Now Seeks iPhone XS and iPhone XR Sales Ban in China as Legal Battle With Apple Intensifies
     
  2. pat500000 Suspended

    pat500000

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
  3. kis macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Location:
    Switzerland
    #3
    Qualcomm are clearly the bad guys here. There's no way Apple can possibly have stolen intellectual property. Only others do that.
     
  4. Aluminum213 macrumors 68040

    Aluminum213

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    #4
    Good for Qualcomm, Apple has bullied enough companies over the years
     
  5. AnthonyG6 macrumors regular

    AnthonyG6

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2017
    #5
    I think there will be an 'out of court' settlement of an undisclosed amount in the near future between Apple and Qualcomm.
     
  6. Mackinjosh Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2014
    #6
    Might as well already be a ban on the XS and Max in China given how awful those phones are selling there.
     
  7. lenard macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Location:
    Raleigh NC
    #7
    Really? Which ones......
     
  8. pat500000 Suspended

    pat500000

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    #8
    Probably group fights.
     
  9. ArtOfWarfare macrumors G3

    ArtOfWarfare

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    #9
    Uh... they already successfully banned all your other products. Doesn't seem like a desperate move to me.
     
  10. ericgtr12 macrumors 65816

    ericgtr12

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    #10
    While Qualcomm may be winning this battle in the short term, they're just forcing Apple's hand who are now focusing on creating their own. In the end I don't see this working out well for Qualcomm.
     
  11. truthertech macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2016
    #11

    Please move that fake news over to other web sites.
     
  12. jcshas macrumors 6502

    jcshas

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2003
    #12
    So doesn’t Apple have enough cash in the bank to buy Qualcomm and make this all go away?
     
  13. AngerDanger, Dec 13, 2018
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2018

    AngerDanger macrumors 601

    AngerDanger

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    #13
    It's amazing how much the patent system sounds like a game of Simon Says. Apple has manufactured machines that manipulate photos and switch applications for decades BUT throw the phrase "using a touch screen" before a feature, and all of the sudden, it's brand new.

    qualcomm says.png
     
  14. AnthonyG6 macrumors regular

    AnthonyG6

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2017
    #14
    Not everything is for sale no matter how much money you have.
     
  15. alvindarkness macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    #15
    Qualcomm aren't seeking bans, they are choosing to curate the phone options in China. Because its the right thing to do, I mean it would be a sin if they didn't.
     
  16. cocky jeremy macrumors 601

    cocky jeremy

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2008
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    #16
    Everything is for sale. With that said, I don't want Apple to buy them. I want Apple to bury them.
     
  17. britboyj macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    #17
    The first Qualcomm patent reportedly enables users to "adjust and reformat the size and appearance of photos," while the second is said to relate to "managing applications using a touch screen when viewing and navigating apps."

    This is such a blindingly obvious patent with prior art I don't see it standing up at all.
     
  18. 78Bandit macrumors 6502a

    78Bandit

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    #18
    Absolutely. Patents should not be issued for things like this. It wasn't that long ago Apple was suing Samsung for using the "swipe to unlock" and "pinch to zoom" gestures. Patent law has gotten ridiculous and is being used to protect generic ideas rather than the specific implementation of those ideas.
     
  19. scottwaugh macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Location:
    Chicago
    #19
    The fact Qualcomm did this after it came out Apple was just going to do their own modems in the future (i.e. Qualcomm doesn't have to beat Intel at Apple, its just never Qualcomm again at Apple) may not be a coincidence.

    I believe that Apple was the biggest selling brand for Singles day there in China (an event much bigger in sales than Black Friday in the U.S.) beating local suppliers even - so they must not be selling too awful (although the local suppliers might want that rumor spread).

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/12/ali...e-was-the-top-selling-mobile-phone-brand.html
     
  20. BvizioN macrumors 601

    BvizioN

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    #20
    You seem to not have an idea who is bulling on this case. The "smart ass" Qualcomm seem to want a % for every iPhone sold (regardless if they do or they do not have their chips in them) and not for the actual chips. And only for Apple. What a wonderful idea he?? Talk about bulling!!
     
  21. newyorksole macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Location:
    New York.
    #21
    Don’t you think it would’ve happened by now? This has been going on for a whiiiile.

    Doesn’t look like they’re settling any time soon.
     
  22. macfacts macrumors 68040

    macfacts

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2012
    Location:
    Cybertron
    #22
    It isn't illegal nor unfair to take a percentage. Apple signed the contract. No one had a gun to Tim's head.
     
  23. ksec macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2015
    #23
    Apple will have to paid Qualcomm one way or another. It is not just the 4G/5G SEP, it is patents like this, and many others in Power Management, SoC, GPU etc. Normally Apple will sign cross patents agreement with Intel, AMD, Microsoft etc so effectively they don't sue each other.

    Problem is Qualcomm aren't willing to do this deals. And if the Court decide the SEP should be lower than what Qualcomm would like, Qualcomm will just charge more for their other patents.

    This will drag on for a very long time. Lawyers should be very happy.
     
  24. ravenstar macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    #24
    I suspect not. Apple seems pretty determined to put an end to Qualcomm's percentage pricing and double charging schemes. I don't think they'll accept an agreement for anything less than per unit pricing inclusive of license fees unless the courts force something different on them.
    --- Post Merged, Dec 13, 2018 ---
    Please read up on FRAND. That changes the playing field significantly.
     
  25. MoreRumors? macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2018
    Location:
    Tim's eyeglass lens
    #25
    So a campfire is not good enough and adding more fuel to transform into a bonfire...SMH.
     

Share This Page

55 December 13, 2018