They might be just as happy buying parts from Qualcomm. I don’t think either of those companies fancy themselves CPU makers— anything they’ve done til now has likely been out of necessity in the absence of a commodity solution.Well that would explain why Intel and AMD were not interested.
Though one would think Amazon or Google might have been interested (and perhaps they were) - especially Amazon since their Graviton CPU is based on ARM.
But I thought it was mainly due to the bigger screens.On the surface, a $1.4B USD acquisition might seem like alot of Coin, but in today's Price-Expanded Stock Market, it's NOT !
Regardless, could be a very good move for QCOM.
I remember working there on their SnapDragon chips when AAPL released the 5s with its Register-Rich A7.
That surprised everyone, including QCOM !
Almost immediately after the 5s was announced, QCOM's customers ONLY wanted 64-bit designs.
That took QCOM over a year to get out the door.
Few outside of chip design know that at-least one-third of AAPL's iPhone 6 family success was due strictly to the fact that QCOM had stumbled.
To my knowledge, NONE of the so-called Pro Stock Analysts who cover AAPL for a living, & that includes the Cheerleader Types (i.e., Munster, Ives, Huberty, & Cramer), have ever mentioned the connection between the A7, QCOM, & the market success of the iPhone 6 family !
To my knowledge, I believe that ALSO applies to the entire staff at MR !
Definitely a good move by Qualcomm...
This will heat up the competition and while Intel made a good move today too, this one is even better
Apple just keeps silently implying, "Bring it on, because we are always a few steps ahead of you!"
They are the ones who invented Apple’s chips.They left Apple with all their knowledge and secrets and sold their new company to competitors for $ 1.4 billion. I do not like it.
I think it was a Wiliam Gibson novel (?) where tech talent was so well guarded that head hunters needed to send in commando teams to liberate them if they wanted to change jobs. We don't want to be in that world.They left Apple with all their knowledge and secrets and sold their new company to competitors for $ 1.4 billion. I do not like it.
You ever see somebody’s reaction when you use something other than Google for a lookup? If it wasn’t the default many IOS users would be confused and annoyed, this is a great way for Apple to pocket easy money while also doing what most consumers prefer (even if it isn’t the most private)"Through its placement as the default search engine in the Safari browser for the iPhone and iPad, Google covers 36% of search queries in the U.S. Consequently, Apple devices accounted for nearly half of Google search traffic in 2019, according to the lawsuit.
Google pays Apple handsomely for that placement. The DOJ cites "public estimates" saying that Google pays Apple between $8 billion and $12 billion per year to be the default search engine on Apple products.
Apple accounts for the Google payment as part of its services business, which had $46.2 billion in sales in fiscal 2019, accounting for 17.7% of the company's total revenue."
Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/21/apple-services-success-story-bolstered-by-huge-google-payments.html
I don't disagree. But Apple is making $12B/year to allow Google to monetize the privacy of its users, so those who claim that Google makes their money monetizing users' privacy while Apple doesn't aren't being objective.You ever see somebody’s reaction when you use something other than Google for a lookup? If it wasn’t the default many IOS users would be confused and annoyed, this is a great way for Apple to pocket easy money while also doing what most consumers prefer (even if it isn’t the most private)
For those who don’t it’s a snap to change defaults.
Thanks for all that, interesting to read!On the surface, a $1.4B USD acquisition might seem like alot of Coin, but in today's Price-Expanded Stock Market, it's NOT !
Regardless, could be a very good move for QCOM.
I remember working there on their SnapDragon chips when AAPL released the 5s with its Register-Rich A7.
That surprised everyone, including QCOM !
Almost immediately after the 5s was announced, QCOM's customers ONLY wanted 64-bit designs.
That took QCOM over a year to get out the door.
Few outside of chip design know that at-least one-third of AAPL's iPhone 6 family success was due strictly to the fact that QCOM had stumbled.
To my knowledge, NONE of the so-called Pro Stock Analysts who cover AAPL for a living, & that includes the Cheerleader Types (i.e., Munster, Ives, Huberty, & Cramer), have ever mentioned the connection between the A7, QCOM, & the market success of the iPhone 6 family !
To my knowledge, I believe that ALSO applies to the entire staff at MR !
This isn’t a big tech mergerThey should be forced to compete in the markets. No more big tech mergers.
Gerard Williams III worked for Intel, TI, ARM and AppleApple’s DNA is in just about evrything these days. Meanwhile Google stills makes money by selling our data to advertisers.
If by “real soon” you mean 2 years from now, then maybe.We can expect iPad pro and M series performance on Windows laptops, tablets and Android phones real soon. Apple cannot sit on their laurels.
First, this doesn’t indicate “serious competition.” Nobody had seen anything from Nuvia, so we have no reason to believe that they can compete with Apple yet.Good. Some serious competition. Apple is part of the Evil Empire these days, time to look for something else.
Wonder if Qualcomm and Apple will now be butting heads over patent infrigement? Will be interesting.This is what's going to make big trouble for Intel , an M1 Clone selling to OEM`s , going to be a fun time to be a consumer.