Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Definitely a good move by Qualcomm...
This will heat up the competition and while Intel made a good move today too, this one is even better
 
Well that would explain why Intel and AMD were not interested. :p

Though one would think Amazon or Google might have been interested (and perhaps they were) - especially Amazon since their Graviton CPU is based on ARM.
They might be just as happy buying parts from Qualcomm. I don’t think either of those companies fancy themselves CPU makers— anything they’ve done til now has likely been out of necessity in the absence of a commodity solution.
 
On the surface, a $1.4B USD acquisition might seem like alot of Coin, but in today's Price-Expanded Stock Market, it's NOT !

Regardless, could be a very good move for QCOM.

I remember working there on their SnapDragon chips when AAPL released the 5s with its Register-Rich A7.

That surprised everyone, including QCOM !

Almost immediately after the 5s was announced, QCOM's customers ONLY wanted 64-bit designs.

That took QCOM over a year to get out the door.

Few outside of chip design know that at-least one-third of AAPL's iPhone 6 family success was due strictly to the fact that QCOM had stumbled.

To my knowledge, NONE of the so-called Pro Stock Analysts who cover AAPL for a living, & that includes the Cheerleader Types (i.e., Munster, Ives, Huberty, & Cramer), have ever mentioned the connection between the A7, QCOM, & the market success of the iPhone 6 family !

To my knowledge, I believe that ALSO applies to the entire staff at MR !
 
On the surface, a $1.4B USD acquisition might seem like alot of Coin, but in today's Price-Expanded Stock Market, it's NOT !

Regardless, could be a very good move for QCOM.

I remember working there on their SnapDragon chips when AAPL released the 5s with its Register-Rich A7.

That surprised everyone, including QCOM !

Almost immediately after the 5s was announced, QCOM's customers ONLY wanted 64-bit designs.

That took QCOM over a year to get out the door.

Few outside of chip design know that at-least one-third of AAPL's iPhone 6 family success was due strictly to the fact that QCOM had stumbled.

To my knowledge, NONE of the so-called Pro Stock Analysts who cover AAPL for a living, & that includes the Cheerleader Types (i.e., Munster, Ives, Huberty, & Cramer), have ever mentioned the connection between the A7, QCOM, & the market success of the iPhone 6 family !

To my knowledge, I believe that ALSO applies to the entire staff at MR !
But I thought it was mainly due to the bigger screens.
 
Definitely a good move by Qualcomm...
This will heat up the competition and while Intel made a good move today too, this one is even better

The real question, after regulatory approval is granted, will Qualcomm pass on their savings to chip purchasers?
ie. Microsoft, Sony, Asus, Acer, Samsung, etc.
 
They left Apple with all their knowledge and secrets and sold their new company to competitors for $ 1.4 billion. I do not like it.
I think it was a Wiliam Gibson novel (?) where tech talent was so well guarded that head hunters needed to send in commando teams to liberate them if they wanted to change jobs. We don't want to be in that world.

They left with their knowledge and talent, but most likely not secrets. If you've done it once, you can do it again. That's the logic behind acquisitions like this. There have been exceptions, like Uber/Waymo (Uber unethical? I'm shocked!), and I think Synopsys and Magma rings a bell, but for the most part trade secrets don't get carried around like that. They don't need to be, any more than you'd recruit a star quarterback to learn an opponents playbook.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: acorntoy
"Through its placement as the default search engine in the Safari browser for the iPhone and iPad, Google covers 36% of search queries in the U.S. Consequently, Apple devices accounted for nearly half of Google search traffic in 2019, according to the lawsuit.

Google pays Apple handsomely for that placement. The DOJ cites "public estimates" saying that Google pays Apple between $8 billion and $12 billion per year to be the default search engine on Apple products.

Apple accounts for the Google payment as part of its services business, which had $46.2 billion in sales in fiscal 2019, accounting for 17.7% of the company's total revenue."

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/21/apple-services-success-story-bolstered-by-huge-google-payments.html
You ever see somebody’s reaction when you use something other than Google for a lookup? If it wasn’t the default many IOS users would be confused and annoyed, this is a great way for Apple to pocket easy money while also doing what most consumers prefer (even if it isn’t the most private)
For those who don’t it’s a snap to change defaults.
 
You ever see somebody’s reaction when you use something other than Google for a lookup? If it wasn’t the default many IOS users would be confused and annoyed, this is a great way for Apple to pocket easy money while also doing what most consumers prefer (even if it isn’t the most private)
For those who don’t it’s a snap to change defaults.
I don't disagree. But Apple is making $12B/year to allow Google to monetize the privacy of its users, so those who claim that Google makes their money monetizing users' privacy while Apple doesn't aren't being objective.
 
On the surface, a $1.4B USD acquisition might seem like alot of Coin, but in today's Price-Expanded Stock Market, it's NOT !

Regardless, could be a very good move for QCOM.

I remember working there on their SnapDragon chips when AAPL released the 5s with its Register-Rich A7.

That surprised everyone, including QCOM !

Almost immediately after the 5s was announced, QCOM's customers ONLY wanted 64-bit designs.

That took QCOM over a year to get out the door.

Few outside of chip design know that at-least one-third of AAPL's iPhone 6 family success was due strictly to the fact that QCOM had stumbled.

To my knowledge, NONE of the so-called Pro Stock Analysts who cover AAPL for a living, & that includes the Cheerleader Types (i.e., Munster, Ives, Huberty, & Cramer), have ever mentioned the connection between the A7, QCOM, & the market success of the iPhone 6 family !

To my knowledge, I believe that ALSO applies to the entire staff at MR !
Thanks for all that, interesting to read!

iPhone 6 was definitely one of their best ever phones, mine finally died last year when I dropped it in the sink. And the 6S the last to have the jack, RIP.
 
Apple’s DNA is in just about evrything these days. Meanwhile Google stills makes money by selling our data to advertisers.
Gerard Williams III worked for Intel, TI, ARM and Apple
Manu Gulati worked for Broadcom, Apple and Google
John Bruno worked for AMD, Apple and Google

All of them spent smallish fractions of their careers at Apple.

Three other VPs have worked for many companies but not for Apple.
 
We can expect iPad pro and M series performance on Windows laptops, tablets and Android phones real soon. Apple cannot sit on their laurels.
 
Last edited:
Good. Some serious competition. Apple is part of the Evil Empire these days, time to look for something else.
 
Good. Some serious competition. Apple is part of the Evil Empire these days, time to look for something else.
First, this doesn’t indicate “serious competition.” Nobody had seen anything from Nuvia, so we have no reason to believe that they can compete with Apple yet.

Second, your “evil empire” comment is drivel.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.