Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Silly John Fatty

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Nov 6, 2012
1,467
278
Does the height-adjustable version go lower than the one that's not adjustable? It would be great to see a picture to compare, but I can't find one.
 

Sheepish-Lord

macrumors 68020
Oct 13, 2021
2,011
3,860
The Apple website kind of shows a comparison from the different heights. Doesn't look like it goes any lower in the first 2 pics if you assume they are already in their lowest positions. The 3rd photo obviously shows the adjustability and VESA mount.

stand-mount-gallery-2-202203


stand-mount-gallery-3-202203


stand-mount-gallery-1-202203
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silly John Fatty

Silly John Fatty

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Nov 6, 2012
1,467
278
The Apple website kind of shows a comparison from the different heights. Doesn't look like it goes any lower in the first 2 pics if you assume they are already in their lowest positions. The 3rd photo obviously shows the adjustability and VESA mount.

stand-mount-gallery-2-202203


stand-mount-gallery-3-202203


stand-mount-gallery-1-202203

Yeah. Someone calculated (through some technical specs they got) that the height-adjustable one is actually 1cm higher in the lowest position than the non-adjustable one. But that's just theory because they calculated that from some numbers they found.

Someone else on YouTube also expressed that thought.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.