Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Senor360

macrumors regular
Original poster
With 20x burn speeds now available, why is it that Apple is still shipping out the iMac with only an 8x burner? When I burn CD's, DVD, photo CD's, etc, I know I appreciate having jumped to a 16x on my crappy PC. The thought of waiting around for 2x the time is kinda bumming me out.

Fortunately that's the only 'bad' thing that I see with my future purchase.
 
With 20x burn speeds now available, why is it that Apple is still shipping out the iMac with only an 8x burner? When I burn CD's, DVD, photo CD's, etc, I know I appreciate having jumped to a 16x on my crappy PC. The thought of waiting around for 2x the time is kinda bumming me out.

Fortunately that's the only 'bad' thing that I see with my future purchase.

The reason that apple is using these drives is that they are the fastest slim slot loading dvd-burners available, as far as I know. Desktop PCs can use the big bulky ones that are at 20X.
 
Well..

That's just a silly reason then. The internals from a 8x to an 20x can't be all that incredibly different that it would require a 'bulk-up' in size, can it? I shudder to think of the drop off in burning speed. I'm such an impatient bastich 🙄

Worst case scenario is i'll add an external 20x burner. Oh well.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.