I disagree. Look at the original problem: y=2.50(3.50)^1.4x. I don't think that's intended to be 2.50 * (3.50 ^ 1.4) * x. I think the product 1.4x is to be treated as the exponent, i.e., 2.50 * ( 3.50 ^ ( 1.4 * x ) ). But if you change x to a constant value, 2.50(3.50)^1.4(2), Google doesn't handle it way rdf8585's problem requires.
In other words, I would interpret 2 ^ 3 * 4 as (2^3)*4, as Google does, but I would interpret 2 ^ 3x as 2 ^ (3 * x) because with the juxtaposition implying implicit multiplication. So my point is that you have to add more parens to get the right answer from Google.
I wouldn't be using Google all that much to calculate my Algebra problems. I used to have Maple and that piece of software had so many options to solving any equation you could think of. I would know, I had to take a class that taught how to use the software, barely passed it. 😱
It's my fault we're talking about math. I meant the discussion to be about teaching errors, but since my examples were about math, and I can't resist talking about math, I'll have to take the blame. 🙁🙂