Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is a dead project, an update doesn't revive it or gain trust with the users anymore. I don't understand why it's mentioned even.

What's next, a news article about TextMate making more false promises?

<grumpy mac user is grumpy (i had flu for a week)>
 
This release is so full of bugs. Searches bring up non existant URL's of folders (???!) that used to reside on my desktop a week ago before I even installed Quicksilver.
 
Don't see much of a point to it really (or for Alfred or Launchbar), all the apps I use regularly are sitting on my dock just a click away and the ones I don't use as much I can open quickly by clicking the aps folder on the dock (which opens as a grid) or by doing a quick spotlight search.
 
Don't see much of a point to it really (or for Alfred or Launchbar), all the apps I use regularly are sitting on my dock just a click away and the ones I don't use as much I can open quickly by clicking the aps folder on the dock (which opens as a grid) or by doing a quick spotlight search.

You really should try one of these apps before writing them off. They are all three much much more than just app launchers. I have used QS, Launchbar, and now settled on Alfred. All three allow you to launch apps, launch bookmarks, select email addresses and start new mails from them, run scripts, copy and delete files.... and more all without taking your hands off the KB and clicking around. Once you get used to what KB combo does what it becomes second nature and a much faster way to work.
 
Yup. Nice to see Quicksilver being worked on. I used it at first because it was free. But it got kind of slow and development stopped so I ended up purchasing LaunchBar. I absolutely love the Clipboard history in LaunchBar. Can't live without it now.
 
I love Quicksilver. I've been using it since nearly the beginning, and I cannot live without it. It's the very first thing I install on a new Mac, every time. The second thing is iSeek. Between the two, I never have to touch my mouse to open anything or do any kind of web search. I just type, and things happen, pretty much at the speed of thought.

Quicksilver is a lot, lot more stable than it used to be. Those who have abandoned it in the past for bugs should really give it another try. I cannot remember the last time it crashed on me, and I use it constantly, probably 30-50 times a day. For those who don't even know what it is, some people above have sort of described it, but you have to understand just how quick it is.

You hit control-space (or whatever), and this little box magically appears. Quicksilver has this famous checkbox in the preferences for "Superfluous visual effects", so it really does seem like magic. It's really instantaneous, and it's very pretty. Without even needing to wait for it to complete its summons, which takes only slightly longer than it takes you to blink, you start typing. Whatever the last thing was you used it for, you can just hit return and it'll do it again, but if you start typing characters, the real magic happens. First of all, it remembers what you use Quicksilver for. I type the letter "a" and it already pops up as "AirPort Utility" before I can even finish typing "air". I've sort of gotten used to typing three letters for everything, in some cases four letters, but generally one or two does it, because Quicksilver learns fast. It knows to give me AirPort Utility for the letter A, and then only switch to Activity Monitor if I type "ac", because I open AirPort Utility a lot more often. It does require a little bit of training at first, but not much. The best thing is, you're not screwed if you type in something wrong, or even if you forget the name of something. Pause for a second or two, or hit delete, and you can retype it. It picks up on acronyms, on partial words, on typos, and it's as fast as you can type. Those few times I have to dig around in the Applications Folder or something (usually Quicksilver), I'm struck by how lost and confused I feel. Those few moments before Quicksilver launches on log-in, if I get ahead of myself and try to launch something and nothing happens, I feel all panicky and bewildered. I guess you could say I'm addicted to the ease of use I've grown accustomed to using Quicksilver all these years. My Dock has been relegated to telling me what I already have open, rather than something to launch applications with. That's right, it's easier for me to open something with Quicksilver than to click a convenient icon right there on my screen.

It's not Spotlight. Spotlight tries to know everything and present you with everything. It's the brute force approach, and of course it's limited to files, and it's incredibly slow by comparison. Spotlight is the conventional army. Quicksilver is like a rapidly deployed commando team. It's smarter, more capable, and it's more direct because it provides you with just the specific result you want, as if it can read your mind. In fact, it does read your mind, because it learns from you, and picks up on things you don't even realize. Rather than carpet bombing you with choice, it chooses for you, but then you always have the option of typing a little bit more, or going down the normally hidden list of results for what you're really looking for. As I said, within two or three characters, it can nearly always get you exactly what you want. Considering my typing speed, I can be launching an application less than a second after I decide to open it, pretty much before I even realize what I'm doing. Occasionally I'll try to do something I haven't done before, and I might have to type a little more than I'm used to, but the next time I try to do that same thing, it'll know what I'm doing a lot sooner.

I've definitely not used all of Quicksilver's features. There's stuff in there I'm sure I don't even know about. In fact, in writing up this post, I discovered something new. I know some hardcore Quicksilver users who do some really crazy stuff.

Quicksilver is not for everybody. Some people just don't work with that many applications, or maybe they're not that confident with the computer, or with their typing. The official Apple ways of opening things and working with applications is intended for a slower user. If you're ready to graduate to instant speed and maximized productivity, give Quicksilver, or something like it, a try. If you work with a lot of web searches, like Google/Wikipedia/Dictionaries/Literally-Any-Website-You-Can-Think-Of, check out iSeek too.
 
Can't you do that with spotlight? or am I missing something?
QS remembers launches. For example: I open QS with keystroke (I use command-space bar) and type "cp" then return and it opens my control panel URL. The first time, if it wasn't at the top of the list I would have scrolled down to it and hit return. It would then remember that and next time I hit "cp" it would remember what I wanted to open. Entering those letters in Spotlight doesn't return that search, and never will.
 
Entering those letters in Spotlight doesn't return that search, and never will.

It doesn't return the search with those particular letters ("cp") but I can simply press command + space to bring up spotlight, type "sys" and hit return to open System Preferences. Which in my opinion feels more natural as you are using the name of the very thing you are looking for, instead of adding an extra layer that you need to memorize (each particular Quicksilver shortcut such as "cp" that one may decide to use).
 
It doesn't return the search with those particular letters ("cp") but I can simply press command + space to bring up spotlight, type "sys" and hit return to open System Preferences. Which in my opinion feels more natural as you are using the name of the very thing you are looking for, instead of adding an extra layer that you need to memorize (each particular Quicksilver shortcut such as "cp" that one may decide to use).
Of course QS will bring up sys prefs, too, with "sys". But "cp" is not a keystroke. It is simply letters within the name of whatever I'm searching for. I could just as easily search for "pan" and it returns it at number 4. If I hit return to select it, it will come at number 1 next time. Spotlight doesn't return it (unless I select 'Show all' and wade through). And it doesn't learn.
 
I'm glad quicksilver updated. It's what I use since Alfred sucks basically.

Wow, not sure what Alfred ever did to you to deserve such a vicious and entirely unsubstantiated comment.

I used QS for years and wasn't having any stability issues with it when I gave Alfred a spin. I loved Alfred so much I bought the Powerpack and haven't looked back.

For my purposes, Alfred is the best app out there and I've pretty much tried them all.

I'm glad QS is back in development for those that use it and love it though.
 
Wow, not sure what Alfred ever did to you to deserve such a vicious and entirely unsubstantiated comment.

I used QS for years and wasn't having any stability issues with it when I gave Alfred a spin. I loved Alfred so much I bought the Powerpack and haven't looked back.

For my purposes, Alfred is the best app out there and I've pretty much tried them all.

I'm glad QS is back in development for those that use it and love it though.

Vicious and unsubstantiated? Oh come on, I wasn't that harsh! I just said it sucks.
The point is, quicksilver can do generally everything alfred does AND then some, all for free. If I don't pay for Alfred, I'm basically getting a launch bar...but quicksilver is faster for me and imo, does the searching faster too.

Ergo, compared to quicksilver, Alfred is pathetic, dumb, annoying, and unquestioningly worse. Okay now I'm being harsh. But that's my opinion. Deal with it :p
 
Last edited:
Vicious and unsubstantiated? Oh come on, I wasn't that harsh! I just said it sucks.
The point is, quicksilver can do generally everything alfred does AND then some, all for free. If I don't pay for Alfred, I'm basically getting a launch bar...but quicksilver is faster for me and imo, does the searching faster too.

Ergo, compared to quicksilver, Alfred is pathetic, dumb, annoying, and unquestioningly worse. Okay now I'm being harsh. But that's my opinion. Deal with it :p

I had no problems with your minority opinion. :p

I just think to say something summarily "sucks" without any explanation whatsoever, as you did, is a bit unfair. That's just my opinion. Deal with it. :p
 
Thanks to the OP, I downloaded Quicksilver. So far it seems like a great app. I can see it taking the place of my dock, which would be really be good on my 12" iBook.
 
To be fair, you haven't stated any reasons that make alfred the "best app out there" either.

As I already mentioned it wasn't your opinion I was objecting to. :p

Alfred does everything Quicksilver used to do for me only more intuitively and with far easier configuration.

As I also already mentioned I've got no axe to grind with Quicksilver and certainly am not trying to say something ridiculous like it "sucks". I used it for a long time and, again, I'm happy it's in development again. Cheers.

Alfred's developers are another reason I love it. They are extremely dedicated to the product and their customers.
 
The second thing is iSeek.

took a closer look at this as i had not heard of it before your post and did not see much beyond a search tool for various sites and resources. this may fill a need for many users but those that use QS (me), Alfred, Butler and most others have functionality to search various resources as well.

In fact I was just trying Butler earlier today and found that a very similar menubar search box to iSeek was part of the application. Not sure which one came first but they do seem quite similar in that respect.

note to all: follow @lovequicksilver on twitter for more information.
 
As I already mentioned it wasn't your opinion I was objecting to. :p

Alfred does everything Quicksilver used to do for me only more intuitively and with far easier configuration.

Nobody's really addressed why I think these are categorically different products. You say Alfred does everything QS does, but I just don't see that at all. To me, Alfred is just a really fast launcher. QS handles abbreviations.

QS learns what I am expecting, and then not only launch, but do all sorts of stuff with it. These features are precisely why it grew on me in the first place.

Does Alfred learn? Can Alfred do more than open things? I feel like this may be apples to apples for you but apples and oranges to me.... Or more like, you care about a subset of what QS does, for which I agree that Alfred is faster, but only at the expense of having to type everything in without intelligent abbreviations.
 
Nobody's really addressed why I think these are categorically different products. You say Alfred does everything QS does, but I just don't see that at all. To me, Alfred is just a really fast launcher. QS handles abbreviations.

QS learns what I am expecting, and then not only launch, but do all sorts of stuff with it. These features are precisely why it grew on me in the first place.

Does Alfred learn? Can Alfred do more than open things? I feel like this may be apples to apples for you but apples and oranges to me.... Or more like, you care about a subset of what QS does, for which I agree that Alfred is faster, but only at the expense of having to type everything in without intelligent abbreviations.

You really should DL and try Alfred. It certainly does learn and it does abbreviations. There is even a setting to toggle this behavior. Alfred is far more than just a launcher. I have used QS and now Alfred and they are not that different as far as features.

Also, the dev is quite actively adding new features.

G0VcL.png
 
Nobody's really addressed why I think these are categorically different products. You say Alfred does everything QS does, but I just don't see that at all. To me, Alfred is just a really fast launcher. QS handles abbreviations.

I wrote that Alfred does everything that QS used to do for me. I do primarily use it as a file launcher but also as a clipboard manager (as I did with QS before it) for file system navigation and performing actions on files and many other functions.

Does Alfred learn? Can Alfred do more than open things? I feel like this may be apples to apples for you but apples and oranges to me.... Or more like, you care about a subset of what QS does, for which I agree that Alfred is faster, but only at the expense of having to type everything in without intelligent abbreviations.

Alfred supports fuzzy matching like Quicksilver, so that you can search for non-contiguous characters in an app's name (e.g. FF for Firefox). Results are weighted towards most used applications. Fuzzy matching can be disabled entirely or anchored to match from the beginning character of the string to improve performance.

Alfred may not be everything QS is, but it is much more than a simple file launcher, especially with the Powerpack. I suggest you visit the Alfred website for more information if you're interested. I'm sure the developers would be glad to answer any questions you might have.
 
do #Alfred or any of the other QS competitors support things like turning on/off the Airport (wifi connection) and other such system controls?

I used to find this quite useful in QS when the plugins were current.
 
do #Alfred or any of the other QS competitors support things like turning on/off the Airport (wifi connection) and other such system controls?

I used to find this quite useful in QS when the plugins were current.

Alfred has built in support for several system commands, but not this one. You could use Alfred to run an Applescript to do this though.
 
do #Alfred or any of the other QS competitors support things like turning on/off the Airport (wifi connection) and other such system controls?

Alfred has built in support for several system commands, but not this one. You could use Alfred to run an Applescript to do this though.

I use this one to toggle Airport.

Code:
set airport_status to do shell script "/usr/sbin/networksetup -getairportpower AirPort"

if airport_status is "AirPort Power (AirPort): On" then
	do shell script "/usr/sbin/networksetup -setairportpower AirPort off"
	set status to "AirPort turned off"
else
	do shell script "/usr/sbin/networksetup -setairportpower AirPort on"
	set status to "AirPort turned on"
end if
 
do #Alfred or any of the other QS competitors support things like turning on/off the Airport (wifi connection) and other such system controls?

I used to find this quite useful in QS when the plugins were current.

A new Airport plugin is coming for Quicksilver. It'll be 10.6+ only though.
The reason the previous plugin stopped working was because Apple removed the Airport API in 10.5 and only released a new one in 10.6
 
You really should DL and try Alfred. It certainly does learn and it does abbreviations. There is even a setting to toggle this behavior. Alfred is far more than just a launcher. I have used QS and now Alfred and they are not that different as far as features.

Also, the dev is quite actively adding new features.

Image

I wrote that Alfred does everything that QS used to do for me. I do primarily use it as a file launcher but also as a clipboard manager (as I did with QS before it) for file system navigation and performing actions on files and many other functions.



Alfred supports fuzzy matching like Quicksilver, so that you can search for non-contiguous characters in an app's name (e.g. FF for Firefox). Results are weighted towards most used applications. Fuzzy matching can be disabled entirely or anchored to match from the beginning character of the string to improve performance.

Alfred may not be everything QS is, but it is much more than a simple file launcher, especially with the Powerpack. I suggest you visit the Alfred website for more information if you're interested. I'm sure the developers would be glad to answer any questions you might have.

Thank you both, but, it looks to me like Alfred supports this fuzzy matching only for apps. I'm really tempted, but I guess I'll stick with QS. Seems like Alfred is prettier but QS is done geekier. Would have gone with Alfred if I had discovered it first, but QS handles keyboard inputs very well....
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.