Jitkoff: I'm inclined to encourage users to move over to the more stable and well supported alternatives like LaunchBar. Right now QS 54 (ed: the current build) accomplishes everything that I really need, the problem is stability, which for some reason most people seem to be ignoring.
Lifehacker: Right, in the end stability is what matters most. I have a MacBook Pro thatuntil your recent updatescrashed QS on a very regular basis, which was always heartbreaking. But I've seen major stability improvements since the updates, which has been fantastic.
Jitkoff: Basically, that branch is condemned to a long slow death. I just don't know if the experimental one will ever be up to snuff. Hence the recommendation of third party apps.
Lifehacker: Gotcha. The thing about Quicksilver is that it really is feature complete for features that I am actually aware of that I need right now. But is the current stable-ish build doomed to never hit a really stable landmark?
Jitkoff: Unfortunately, I think not.
Lifehacker: Oh wow, you're looking to break hearts!
Jitkoff: I told you you wouldn't like the answers.
Lifehacker: Well, I suppose we'll have to manage.
Jitkoff: I think that many of the alternatives are quite good. Making people relearn is a mean thing to do though.
Lifehacker: Right. I guess from my standpoint, the fact that Quicksilver is free (as well as open source, now) is a major part of why it's so beloved.
Jitkoff: But also why it is so poorly supported. I have to do any work in off-time.