Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Miss Jones

The morning host was Miss Jones...I guess she is well known in NY radio morning show. Before the aired of the song. Miss Jones was 100% for airing the song, and considered it funny. When I listened to the song. I was wondering did they have similar song for Twin Towers?

It was just stupid...
 
Transic said:
I must admit that I thought the bit was rather funny. Crude and insensitve, but funny. It was blatantly going to touch buttons, but is that necessarily a bad thing? Beauty to one person is extremely disturbing to another.
I agree that humor is often subjective. Some people "get" "The Royal Tenenbaums" or "Mony Python's Flying Circus," others scratch their heads.

Indecency, as defined by the FCC assumes a sexual connotation. What Hot 97 did doesn't violate the FCC's standards for indency or obscenity. But to me that's not the crux (I love that word) of the issue.

While the arguement can be made that making light of a disaster is at best done in poor taste, the blatantly racist manner in which it done is simply wrong. Racism is not subjective. There is no grey area in my opinion.
 
Its just completely tasteless to air such a thing. In my opinion its blatent racism, and hopefully the FCC will step in, thats what they are there for. Im pretty pissed, I have no tolerance for racism. When i hear that clip i think, how would these people feel if this was a song about their own family who were caught in the disaster, would they still think its funny. :mad:
 
I'd be interested to see the reaction of the U.S. if other countries started playing a song making fun of the people who died in 9/11.
 
Interesting; I'm actually one to make fun of even the most horrific of events, so I understand the draw of something like this--I believe my (Asian) wife and I might've cracked a joke or two while watching Tsunami coverage (boy, they're spending a lot more time on it Japan than in the States), though we both recognize it as the mind-boggling tragedy it is. And I don't think that the bit violates any indecency laws; anti-discrimination laws, I'm not so sure about, but not decency laws anyway.

That said, I don't think that this was very funny to begin with, and it sounded far more racist than just insensitive. There is a difference; "Ha ha, you died!" is insensitive, "Ha ha, I'm glad you died because I hate asians!" is racist. The former may be offensive to a lot of people, but the latter is just wrong.

And so while perhaps the FCC shouldn't fine these guys, I'm with that Hot97Sucks site--they're not trying to get the government to censor them, just punch them in the pocketbook and get their advertising pulled. This, I'd say, is entirely legit--if the station broadcasts insulting crap, then show them you don't appreciate it by not listening and making it clear that you don't appreciate companies who help them continue.

That's protest, not censorship, and is another form of freedom of speech. In fact, a boycott seems like about the only way to get anything done in the US anymore.
 
Transic said:
I'm going to be the lone voice of decent, because I want to delve a bit deeper into this issue. I think it all boils down to the question of where do we draw the line --that ever moving decency line. Is a tragedy automatically off limits for humor? I certainly hope not. If they had not used a racist term like "chink," would you still be asking for people to be fired?
...

It's "the lone voice of dissent" not "the lone voice of decent".

By the way, thanks for using the racist term. Unless you're Chinese, you have no right to use it at all.

Showing hatred in a morning show is one way to keep the ratings going. It's also a way to keep hatred going, even if it wasn't intended. They were out of line.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.