I'm just a bit unsure about which way to go with the RAID I'm setting up... I've got 4x300GB drives that I'll be setting up in RAID. I've been doing extensive research and have found that for applications that require high levels of speed in disk read/writes that RAID 5 isn't the best option. RAID 0 is always recommended for video editing, etc. And since I'd have enough drives, RAID 10 would provide that speed and redundancy. I'm just wanting some real-world feedback from people who have experience with either RAID 5, 0 or 10. The prospect of having ~900GB available storage using RAID 5 is appealing, but I just wonder how much the disk read/write speed differs between RAID 0? Of course a RAID 10 setup would still provide 600GB storage, the extra 300GB would be handy, but not if it would severly affect HD performance. Any comments and help would be greatly appreciated.