The thing that scares me is that ransomeware can lay dormant for a period of time, and then activate. That means backups are infected and you won't even know it.Yup I've got a couple of offline backups. Not had any ransomware yet but if I do, it's just a simple re-install of Windows.
Ransomware isn't about "infection" per se. The idea is the software is loaded and executed and then encrypts all your files so that you can't access them. The encryption is removed when you pay them money.The thing that scares me is that ransomeware can lay dormant for a period of time, and then activate. That means backups are infected and you won't even know it.
Ransomware isn't about "infection" per se. The idea is the software is loaded and executed and then encrypts all your files so that you can't access them. The encryption is removed when you pay them money.
The reality of ransomware right now is that many of the devices infected will not have adequate backups installed, and even many of those who do back up files tend to find that the restore functions isn't working, rendering their backups useless.
Still not infection, it's not entering the actual files and lying dormant, it's dormant on the PC. If you've backed up your files before it wakes, that back up is safe. You just need to ensure that when you're restoring from back up you don't bring it with you.
I don't know what the trigger is, but that might be a possibility, the fact remains that these types of malware are becoming more insidious and even backups may not be safe.Presumably if you had a backup, you could set the clock back on your computer and remove the ransomware from the backup.
Can a Bitlocker encrypted drive be "touched"?....So far the fact remains that OS X appears to be largely untouched, whether because those malware authors choose to focus on windows, or because OS X has set up safeguards - or a mixture of two.
you mean encrypt data that sits on an encrypted drive, I can't see why not. At the application level, the data appears to be unencrypted because the OS is handling the decryption.Can a Bitlocker encrypted drive be "touched"?
There was a rare instance of a Mac targeting ransomware earlier this year - KeRanger. A signed installer for a BitTorrent client, Transmission, was used as its pathway. There was evidence in the code, though possibly not fully developed, that Time Machine appeared to be an included target. KeRanger's code included a three day delay before it would begin connecting with its control servers, then would begin to encrypt certain user files.
http://researchcenter.paloaltonetwo...ted-transmission-bittorrent-client-installer/
At the time of the incident, Dino Dai Zova tweeted this :I do not think that it would that be easy for a malware to touch Time Machine without root privileges. I remember reading that there are measures even at the kernel level that prevent mere users from writing to the Time Machine disk at all. As far as Time Machine goes, you will probably be secure as long as there are no vulnerabilities in Time Machine or the malware obtains root privileges. It is plausible that a malware could fill the computer with useless data to cause it to delete old backups though.
It deserves mentioning that once again, running as a standard user for 99.9% of the time is good advice.
https://mobile.twitter.com/dinodaizovi/status/706723421116362752Why couldn't the ransomware encrypt files in TimeMachine backups? Mac OS X uses TMSafetyNet kext to make the files immutable after creation.
At the time of the incident, Dino Dai Zova tweeted this :
https://mobile.twitter.com/dinodaizovi/status/706723421116362752
I'm not quoting this as an appeal to authority but as a possible clue for research. I haven't yet found any confirmation for the claim.
How vulnerable should I feel ?
As stated earlier there was the instance with KeRanger and nothing since, but some good info including how to avoid and where to go if you become infected in a 12/16 article, by Krebs, here : https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/12/before-you-pay-that-ransomware-demand/