The last few days I've noticed some discussion about Rapid Weaver. I don't know how long it's been around, but it looks like a nice little tool. I am sure that there can be arguments against it for it being a canned website and such, but looking at the site it looks like it's super easy to update and such. I want a new design, but I lack the necessary time to get going on it so I was curious to hear other people's thoughts on it. What characterists do the sites that use it have that makes it look like a canned site? Is it so bad to have a canned site? Right now I use movable type for my blog which I love and have used for many years. For my gallery I use a php gallery called Gallery (original name eh). Combined I just make the rest of the site in html, easy for me. Now I was considering using word press because I liked the look, but I wondered if Word Press was just movable type's "user friendly" blog. I want something that doesn't require tons of updates since I don't blog much now a days, but I like to have it. Anyway, I just liked the mac integration and since I am buying a sub to .mac (from someone here) I'd like to see what I can do with the two combined. The biggest is RW is not free so I want to be sure before I spend even $35.