Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Neopangea

macrumors newbie
Original poster
May 6, 2011
6
0
Hi there,

im decided to switch to mac and one of several doubts i had was, how can i continue to use, read and write on my external ntfs drives.

In an apple store today a guy told me that if im running windows via bootcamp i wouldnt have any troubles writing into ntfs drives... is that true?

Anyway i wanted to know if there is a good alternative to read and write into ntfs drives while being inside OSX.

Thanks for any advice.
 
Nov 28, 2010
22,670
31
located
Mac OS X can read NTFS formatted volumes natively.
FAT32 (File Allocation Table)
  • Read/Write FAT32 from both native Windows and native Mac OS X.
  • Maximum file size: 4GB.
  • Maximum volume size: 2TB
NTFS (Windows NT File System)
  • Read/Write NTFS from native Windows.
  • Read only NTFS from native Mac OS X
  • To Read/Write/Format NTFS from Mac OS X: Install NTFS-3G for Mac OS X (free)
  • Some have reported problems using Tuxera (approx 33USD).
  • Native NTFS support can be enabled in Snow Leopard, but is not advisable, due to instability.
  • AirPort Extreme (802.11n) and Time Capsule do not support NTFS
  • Maximum file size: 16 TB
  • Maximum volume size: 256TB
HFS+ (Hierarchical File System, a.k.a. Mac OS Extended)
  • Read/Write HFS+ from native Mac OS X
  • Required for Time Machine or Carbon Copy Cloner backups of Mac internal hard drive.
  • To Read/Write HFS+ from Windows, Install MacDrive
  • To Read HFS+ (but not Write) from Windows, Install HFSExplorer
  • Maximum file size: 8EiB
  • Maximum volume size: 8EiB
exFAT (FAT64)
  • Supported in Mac OS X only in 10.6.5 or later.
  • exFAT partitions created with OS X 10.6.5 are inaccessible from Windows 7
  • Not all Windows versions support exFAT. See disadvantages.
  • exFAT (Extended File Allocation Table)
  • AirPort Extreme (802.11n) and Time Capsule do not support exFAT
  • Maximum file size: 16 EiB
  • Maximum volume size: 64 ZiB
 

Neopangea

macrumors newbie
Original poster
May 6, 2011
6
0
Sorry if this is a very common question. I heard that OS X can read on ntfs, but i need it to be able to read and write, so to able to do that i would have to install comercial software? or what other walkarounds are out there that are fast and stable? It seems the free solution in the info given is not very fast.
 
Nov 28, 2010
22,670
31
located
Sorry if this is a very common question. I heard that OS X can read on ntfs, but i need it to be able to read and write, so to able to do that i would have to install comercial software? or what other walkarounds are out there that are fast and stable? It seems the free solution in the info given is not very fast.

There is also Paragon NTFS.
 

MacAndMic

macrumors 6502
Jun 4, 2009
394
1,757
You have not mentioned your actual needs so giving advice is difficult.

Is this just a simple question on how to migrate to a Mac? or do you have drives that need to be used as a liaison from work/school to home?

Just because you have existing drives formatted with NTFS does not mean you have to write to NTFS.

This is most likely an easy answer but without knowing your needs we could go on and on and on.
 

matrix07

macrumors G3
Jun 24, 2010
8,226
4,891
OP, thank you for starting this useful thread for everyone who's deciding to convert or not

You have not mentioned your actual needs so giving advice is difficult.

Is this just a simple question on how to migrate to a Mac? or do you have drives that need to be used as a liaison from work/school to home?

Just because you have existing drives formatted with NTFS does not mean you have to write to NTFS.

This is most likely an easy answer but without knowing your needs we could go on and on and on.

How about this? I have 1 TB external half full with movies and I add ones every day. Now I can read existing movies but what about the new ones? Can I just continue writing files to the drive?
 
Nov 28, 2010
22,670
31
located
OP, thank you for starting this useful thread for everyone who's deciding to convert or not



How about this? I have 1 TB external half full with movies and I add ones every day. Now I can read existing movies but what about the new ones? Can I just continue writing files to the drive?

Yes, you can.
Post #2 tells you how.
 

JeepGuy

macrumors 6502
Sep 24, 2008
332
110
Barrie
Option 1
Really your best option is to buy a 2nd drive, format it to HFS+, then copy all your movies over to the new drive, then format the old drive to HFS+

Option 2
If you really want to keep it NTFS, then install Parallels and run it in coherence mode with windows 7 installed.

Unless there is a really good reason to keep it as NTFS, I would pick option 1, even thou OSX can read NTFS, there is no reliable way to write it.
 

GGJstudios

macrumors Westmere
May 16, 2008
44,545
943
Sorry if this is a very common question. I heard that OS X can read on ntfs, but i need it to be able to read and write, so to able to do that i would have to install comercial software? or what other walkarounds are out there that are fast and stable? It seems the free solution in the info given is not very fast.
To Read/Write/Format NTFS from Mac OS X: Install NTFS-3G for Mac OS X (free)

This free solution works just fine, as has been reported in hundreds of posts in this forum. It should serve your needs quite well. Enabling native NTFS in Snow Leopard is problematic and unstable, and quite a few have reported problems with Tuxera, as well.
 

sl1200mk2

macrumors 6502
Oct 17, 2006
320
3
Anyway i wanted to know if there is a good alternative to read and write into ntfs drives while being inside OSX.

Unless there is a really good reason to keep it as NTFS, I would pick option 1, even thou OSX can read NTFS, there is no reliable way to write it.

It was mentioned in a previous reply, but I would recommend Paragon NTFS -- it's a $20 purchase and well worth it. Very easy to install and simply adds a section to your system preferences to turn it on or off.

As far as stability, I've been reading/writing to numerous ext. USB devices (both HD and memory stick) and Firewire drives for 3 years now on my MacBook Pro and have never encountered issues. I transfer tens of gigs worth of video on occasion. Sometimes to the internal drive, sometimes between other external devices. In fact, it's been so seamless I've forgotten it's there until I go to use another MAC that doesn't have it and I'm forced to recall how mine works. It's just part of the OS and experience (completely unobtrusive).

Good luck -
 

matrix07

macrumors G3
Jun 24, 2010
8,226
4,891
Option 1
Really your best option is to buy a 2nd drive, format it to HFS+, then copy all your movies over to the new drive, then format the old drive to HFS+

Thank you. The new drive sounds like the best plan. I can read the old one anyway. I'll keep my old PC just to write to that drive.
 

And1ss

macrumors 6502a
Oct 20, 2009
542
2
It was mentioned in a previous reply, but I would recommend Paragon NTFS -- it's a $20 purchase and well worth it. Very easy to install and simply adds a section to your system preferences to turn it on or off.

As far as stability, I've been reading/writing to numerous ext. USB devices (both HD and memory stick) and Firewire drives for 3 years now on my MacBook Pro and have never encountered issues. I transfer tens of gigs worth of video on occasion. Sometimes to the internal drive, sometimes between other external devices. In fact, it's been so seamless I've forgotten it's there until I go to use another MAC that doesn't have it and I'm forced to recall how mine works. It's just part of the OS and experience (completely unobtrusive).

Good luck -

Paragon NTFS works great, but if you have a bootcamp partition, it'll remove the windows startup option under "Start Up" in preferences + the hd icon on desktop, which in my opinion is quite annoying. I've researched that you can overcome the issue, but it just wasn't worth my time.

OP, may I consider sticking to FAT32 if you just want to write into external hdds (unless the files are bigger than 4.7gig)
 

Neopangea

macrumors newbie
Original poster
May 6, 2011
6
0
Thanks to all for posting your opinions and views about this topic, im totally new in the mac world, basically im preparing since i'll be buying an imac from the new line in a couple weeks, and i have several external hard drives full of content that i still want to be able to share with pc users, thats why the take your files away reformat to hfs+ and put them in the hard drive again option wouldnt work for me.
Also i often connect external drives to my TV since it plays h.264 videos, etc, but i seriously doubt it will support hfs+.

Im planning to have windows 7 via bootcamp also to play some games, and i know now i could read and write to ntfs from there right? But i want to be able to work with the files in the drive with OS X apps not only from windows.

Some of you name paragon as a nice option but how is that thing that it will remove the windows startup option thing?

Thanks!
 

And1ss

macrumors 6502a
Oct 20, 2009
542
2
Thanks to all for posting your opinions and views about this topic, im totally new in the mac world, basically im preparing since i'll be buying an imac from the new line in a couple weeks, and i have several external hard drives full of content that i still want to be able to share with pc users, thats why the take your files away reformat to hfs+ and put them in the hard drive again option wouldnt work for me.
Also i often connect external drives to my TV since it plays h.264 videos, etc, but i seriously doubt it will support hfs+.

Im planning to have windows 7 via bootcamp also to play some games, and i know now i could read and write to ntfs from there right? But i want to be able to work with the files in the drive with OS X apps not only from windows.

Some of you name paragon as a nice option but how is that thing that it will remove the windows startup option thing?

Thanks!

In your external drives, is some of the content larger than 4.7gig? If you don't have any over 4.7gb, consider reformatting those drives to FAT32. That'll resolve many compatibility issues.

From my experiences, Paragon removes the "Windows" from Startup Disk under Preferences. This is a known issue and it can be resolved (just google Paragon). Not really a big problem since you can always restart and hold the option button to boot into windows, but that's a bit bothersome?
 

GGJstudios

macrumors Westmere
May 16, 2008
44,545
943
In your external drives, is some of the content larger than 4.7gig? If you don't have any over 4.7gb, consider reformatting those drives to FAT32.
FAT32 supports volume sizes up to 2TB. Read the format info in the 2nd post of this thread.
 

And1ss

macrumors 6502a
Oct 20, 2009
542
2
FAT32 supports volume sizes up to 2TB. Read the format info in the 2nd post of this thread.

I'm not talking about volume size; I'm talking about file sizes of his content in his external hdds. If he doesn't bluray rips or whatever, then FAT32 would be a better route.

Quoted from you: Maximum file size: 4GB.
 
Last edited:

sl1200mk2

macrumors 6502
Oct 17, 2006
320
3
Some of you name paragon as a nice option but how is that thing that it will remove the windows startup option thing?

I'm not doubting the comment, but I can't recall this happening myself. Personally, I prefer to hide my bootcamp partition from OS X and just use external drives when needed. I don't believe my preference to start has changed at all, but it really doesn't matter even if it does. I simply hold the 'option' key while starting or rebooting and you select which volume you wish to boot in. For me, that's quicker than going into preferences, making a selecting then rebooting.
 

GGJstudios

macrumors Westmere
May 16, 2008
44,545
943
I'm not talking about volume size; I'm talking about file sizes of his content in his external hdds. If he doesn't bluray rips or whatever, then FAT32 would be a better route. -_-

Quoted from you: Maximum file size: 4GB.
Gotcha. Missed that you were talking file size and not volume size. The 4.7 number you were using was throwing me.
The maximum possible size for a file on a FAT32 volume is 4 GiB minus 1 byte or 4 294 967 295 (232−1) bytes.
 

And1ss

macrumors 6502a
Oct 20, 2009
542
2
I'm not doubting the comment, but I can't recall this happening myself. Personally, I prefer to hide my bootcamp partition from OS X and just use external drives when needed. I don't believe my preference to start has changed at all, but it really doesn't matter even if it does. I simply hold the 'option' key while starting or rebooting and you select which volume you wish to boot in. For me, that's quicker than going into preferences, making a selecting then rebooting.

Correct me if I am wrong, but if you do the option manner, boot into windows, turn off, boot again, it'll default to OSX. The preference way assumes to always start up in windows the next time (if needed).

Again, this is from my experience and I may be wrong.
 

And1ss

macrumors 6502a
Oct 20, 2009
542
2
Gotcha. Missed that you were talking file size and not volume size. The 4.7 number you were using was throwing me.

Ahh I see. I know it is always 4 + something haha. I just use 4.7 since I'm accustomed to it. Thanks for the clarification on the FAT32 file size limitation.
 

sl1200mk2

macrumors 6502
Oct 17, 2006
320
3
Correct me if I am wrong, but if you do the option manner, boot into windows, turn off, boot again, it'll default to OSX. The preference way assumes to always start up in windows the next time (if needed).

Again, this is from my experience and I may be wrong.

You could be right? I don't know. It's a Mac, so for me I want it to default to booting into OS X. Isn't that the point? ;)

If I'm rebooting in Windows and need to boot back in I hold the option key again. For me, it's not that big of a deal (couple seconds) and certainly not a deal breaker as the pro's for Paragon (again for me) certainly far outweigh any of that.

Everyone is different, so YMMV.
 

And1ss

macrumors 6502a
Oct 20, 2009
542
2
You could be right? I don't know. It's a Mac, so for me I want it to default to booting into OS X. Isn't that the point? ;)

If I'm rebooting in Windows and need to boot back in I hold the option key again. For me, it's not that big of a deal (couple seconds) and certainly not a deal breaker as the pro's for Paragon (again for me) certainly far outweigh any of that.

Everyone is different, so YMMV.

Haha yeah, but sometimes I like to use the Windows side for some of my basic work needs like Office (that's just the way I am sometimes). Plus I use MacDrive so I work off of and store my data on the mac partition.

Or if I am on a starcraft 2 binge, i'd like to turn on the computer and not press anything =).

But your right, everyone is different.
 

Neopangea

macrumors newbie
Original poster
May 6, 2011
6
0
In your external drives, is some of the content larger than 4.7gig? If you don't have any over 4.7gb, consider reformatting those drives to FAT32. That'll resolve many compatibility issues.

Yeah in my case a lot of the content is bigger than 4gb, so fat32 is not really an option. A lot of this content i would like be able to work with it inside OS X and using mac apps but i also wanted the drive to be able to be read by pc users and my TV... i guess paragon is then the better choice?

Is it stable enough to transfer big files?
How often you could get a corrupt file here and there?
Is the transfer speed lower compared to windows transfering to ntfs?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.