Apple has dropped the refurb price on the iPad 2.
Sign that a retina iPad 3 will come early in the new year, or with many under $200 tablets available are sales slowing?
Apple has dropped the refurb price on the iPad 2.
Sign that a retina iPad 3 will come early in the new year, or with many under $200 tablets available are sales slowing?
4DThinker said:Refurbs can be in any shape, and perhaps the cream of them have been sold at the higher price, with the bottom of the barrel left. The lower price is also likely to be a competitive move to battle Christmas tablet competition.
Except for the one they sent me, apparently. Scratches on the back, light leak at screen edges.Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)There is no such thing as a bad refurb from Apple.
Except for the one they sent me, apparently. Scratches on the back, light leak at screen edges.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)
There is no such thing as a bad refurb from Apple.
Those ipads were returned for a reason.![]()
Yes and then Apple fixed whatever problem(s) the had.
Look up the definition of refurbished![]()
Then why are people still having issues like bleeding backlights with refurbs, if they were tested so extensively for faults? By your logic, there should be no reason to ever get a brand new ipad, since it may be prone to defects. May as well wait for refurbs, which are typically cheaper and have already been fixed/tested.
From what I know, apple simply changes the batt and casing. The original problem may or may not have been detected and/or fixed.![]()
Then why are people still having issues like bleeding backlights with refurbs, if they were tested so extensively for faults? By your logic, there should be no reason to ever get a brand new ipad, since it may be prone to defects. May as well wait for refurbs, which are typically cheaper and have already been fixed/tested.
From what I know, apple simply changes the batt and casing. The original problem may or may not have been detected and/or fixed.![]()
I would buy a refurb in a heart beat. They replace the case, battery AND any issues it had. You still get a 1 year warranty (most companies will offer a 90 day warranty on refubs) and you can get Applecare on top of it.
My probably with refurbs is waiting for them to show up in the refub store.
Why would any company replace the battery if the device is only a few days or weeks old and the battery is working perfectly?
Do you think Apple would replace perfect batteries that perform 100% up to spec because they just enjoy taking the time and spending the money to do so?
And then have to pay for safe disposal of all these perfect batteries.
No, I don't think they would either.
You really really believe Apple would pay the cost and spend the time to replace the battery on a device that may only have been brand new and sold the day before it was returned for backlight bleed?
If the case is 100% mark free, the battery is up to spec, and the screen is within their quality control specs, apart from giving it a clean, they are not going to do anything to it before it's sold as a refurb, why would they, as it would not be any better after all the time and money spent on it.
Then why are people still having issues like bleeding backlights with refurbs, if they were tested so extensively for faults? By your logic, there should be no reason to ever get a brand new ipad, since it may be prone to defects. May as well wait for refurbs, which are typically cheaper and have already been fixed/tested.
From what I know, apple simply changes the batt and casing. The original problem may or may not have been detected and/or fixed.![]()
Lol shows you don't know much on the subject.
Why would any company replace the battery if the device is only a few days or weeks old and the battery is working perfectly?
Do you think Apple would replace perfect batteries that perform 100% up to spec because they just enjoy taking the time and spending the money to do so?
And then have to pay for safe disposal of all these perfect batteries.
No, I don't think they would either.
You really really believe Apple would pay the cost and spend the time to replace the battery on a device that may only have been brand new and sold the day before it was returned for backlight bleed?
If the case is 100% mark free, the battery is up to spec, and the screen is within their quality control specs, apart from giving it a clean, they are not going to do anything to it before it's sold as a refurb, why would they, as it would not be any better after all the time and money spent on it.
Because they don't now how the 1st owner treated the battery then they 1st got the iPad. It's probably cheaper to replace the battery in the long run also, to make sure the customer doesn't have any issues with it. And you think they pay to disposal of them? They probably get a deal from whoever makes them.
I also said nothing about screens, unless it's damage and yes they will replace it.
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals
Then why are people still having issues like bleeding backlights with refurbs, if they were tested so extensively for faults? By your logic, there should be no reason to ever get a brand new ipad, since it may be prone to defects. May as well wait for refurbs, which are typically cheaper and have already been fixed/tested.
From what I know, apple simply changes the batt and casing. The original problem may or may not have been detected and/or fixed.![]()
Are you just pulling possible problems out of your ass? That's what it seems like. LOL
Who is "still" having bleeding backlight issues specific to refurbed iPads?
From what you know, apple "simply changes the batt and casing". And just how do you know the inner workings of Apple's refurb process?
Finally, you said "the original problem may or may not have been detected and/or fixed". That would mean that Apple's tech support would have to be among the worst on the planet. Do you have documentation that this is true?