Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Why is there no OIS in iPhone 6?

  • Apple wanted to make people buy iPhone 6+

    Votes: 41 45.6%
  • Limited supplies of the camera module so 6+ was prioritized.

    Votes: 3 3.3%
  • Technical reasons

    Votes: 28 31.1%
  • More than one of the above reasons.

    Votes: 12 13.3%
  • Not sure, don't know.

    Votes: 6 6.7%

  • Total voters
    90
  • Poll closed .

SteveJobs2.0

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Mar 9, 2012
898
1,679
What do you think is the reason for no optical image stabilization in the iPhone 6
 

NATO

macrumors 68000
Feb 14, 2005
1,702
35
Northern Ireland
If I had to guess, I would say the camera module with OIS is taller than the one without, and if put into the iPhone 6 it would stick out more than on the iPhone 6 Plus given it's a thinner phone.
 

gzzzz

macrumors newbie
Sep 12, 2014
8
0
Because Apple needs a new feature to sell the iPhone 6S :mad:

They could've easily added the feature to iPhone 6 by making it a bit thicker and increasing battery capacity, but they know that people will still buy the iphone 6 in spite of its missing features.
 

Skylitfly

macrumors 6502a
May 3, 2014
583
215
If I had to guess, I would say the camera module with OIS is taller than the one without, and if put into the iPhone 6 it would stick out more than on the iPhone 6 Plus given it's a thinner phone.

Pretty much this I guess. Im happy with my 6 despite it doesnt have OIS.
 

Hal~9000

macrumors 68020
Sep 13, 2014
2,123
1,984
Because Apple needs a new feature to sell the iPhone 6S :mad:

They could've easily added the feature to iPhone 6 by making it a bit thicker and increasing battery capacity, but they know that people will still buy the iphone 6 in spite of its missing features.

It makes me sad just how right you are :(
 

iPhone7ate9

macrumors 6502a
Jun 22, 2014
720
0

geoff5093

macrumors 68020
Sep 16, 2014
2,238
2,556
Dover, NH
No need for a smaller device. The 6 + is bigger and its more prone to a camera shake.
Sounds like an Apple answer...

There's no reason why someone wouldn't want OIS. It helps to mitigate camera shake, something that is present with your arms out regardless of what they are holding.
 

iPhone7ate9

macrumors 6502a
Jun 22, 2014
720
0
Sounds like an Apple answer...

There's no reason why someone wouldn't want OIS. It helps to mitigate camera shake, something that is present with your arms out regardless of what they are holding.

Yes but if literally the only phone you can choose from is the iPhone 6, it's not going to matter. No one should be getting a 6+ SOLEY for the OIS.
 

ucfgrad93

macrumors Core
Aug 17, 2007
19,028
10,260
Colorado
If I had to guess, I would say the camera module with OIS is taller than the one without, and if put into the iPhone 6 it would stick out more than on the iPhone 6 Plus given it's a thinner phone.

Sounds pretty plausible to me.
 

iCarabma

macrumors 6502
Feb 22, 2012
291
40
There simply isn't enough space in the smaller model, I'm sure. Plus I'm sure it's a bit of a battery hog. The lens actually moves.
 

JayLenochiniMac

macrumors G5
Nov 7, 2007
12,819
2,388
New Sanfrakota
Until you get into low light. Then OIS is the only way to go.

Not always. See http://techcrunch.com/2014/09/17/life-is-tough/?ncid=rss

iPhone 6, no OIS
img_0342.jpg


iPhone 6 Plus with OIS
img_00511.jpg


Hardly a significance difference between the two in term of real world usage as camera shake isn't always a given.
 

ReallyBigFeet

macrumors 68030
Apr 15, 2010
2,935
101
The 6+ was targeted at older people with poor eyesight and shaky hands. OIS was a requirement.

For the younger more vibrant iP6 demogtaphic, wasn't needed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.