Can anyone recommend me a 1TB external HD to use with my MBP? I'm in need of a bit more space with time machine and thought 1TB should do me for the foreseeable future.
That doesn't help him with Time MAchine as much as using a single 1 TB drive. Even though they might be daisy chained, TM will still treat them as separate drives, and thus as separate TM backups.I thought TB drives were still on the pricey side.
Also consider multiple smaller drives - say 2 500G drives (daisy chain them under fire wire and lose no USB ports)
Just for the sake that if this is a backup drive - it may be cheaper, and more reliable to use 2 drives instead of one.
I thought TB drives were still on the pricey side.
Also consider multiple smaller drives - say 2 500G drives (daisy chain them under fire wire and lose no USB ports)
External FW/USB 1 TB drives can be had for around $300 now. How is building your own cheaper at $600+?to the OP: i would personally advise buying your own case, and your own HD. turns out to be cheaper from my experience.
Big-TDI-Guy: i spent a solid month researching hard drives because i was going to buy one and it turned out that the 1Tb hard drive was quite a bit cheaper than the 2x500gb hard drives.
e.g. 500gb $190x2 + external case $260 = 640
1tb $350 + external case $260 = $610
External FW/USB 1 TB drives can be had for around $300 now. How is building your own cheaper at $600+?
I was looking at the same one, seems to be marketed with a different brand name in different countries.
So it might be sold by someone else down under.
G
I JUST came back to this thread to inform you I found that. Like 2 minutes ago.
Well if you get it - as I said to the other individual, let me know where you got it form - and how it well worked for you. (please)
is everyone elses TB drive 1 TB? Mine came out to only 930GB![]()
That's not actually it. Hard drive companies multiply everything by 1000, rather than 1024, so they just measure 1TB as 1000 GB (instead of 1024 GB), 1GB as 1000 MB, and so on. Soyea tahts normal. hard drive companies work with bytes.. we work with bits. so technically your TeraBYTE hard drive is only a teraBIT hard drive. you have to divide the overall capacity by 8 to get the actual storage space in bytes.
That's not actually it. Hard drive companies multiply everything by 1000, rather than 1024, so they just measure 1TB as 1000 GB (instead of 1024 GB), 1GB as 1000 MB, and so on. So
1000KB * 1000 (= 1 MB) * 1000 (= 1 GB) * 1000 = 1TB worth of bytes as per manufacturer
but factor 1024 back into the total byte size and you get something less than a true terabyte, actually more like 909 GB (if I did my math correctly).
I think eventually the industry will be forced to be more honest with size, just like they had to with the measurement of displays a decade or so ago (there was a class action on that).
Your explanation -- i.e. bits vs bytes -- would mean the drive is only 125 GB. I don't think that's what you meant.
$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/disk0s2 56Gi 31Gi 25Gi 56% /
devfs 110Ki 110Ki 0Bi 100% /dev
I want a 1 TB drive for Time Machine too. I ordered my iMac with a 750 Gb drive, so I figure 1 TB is the right size for a dedicated Time Machine drive. I've narrowed it down to these two. The first one is a single drive, the second is two drives in a RAID 0 configuration, but both are attractive, fanless, and firewire 800:
Western Digital My Book Studio, $370. This is a single "green" drive--saves energy, slower spinning but faster than many 7200 rpm drives, plus a FIVE YEAR warranty. Also, it's beautiful.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136184
review: http://www.zdnet.com.au/reviews/har...dio-Edition-1TB-/0,139023427,339283701,00.htm
Or, if I go cheap, LaCie Extreme+, $305. 3 year warranty, 7200. Quite a bit bigger, but far more attractive than most 1 TB drives. In RAID 0, so it looks like a single drive to you and the mac.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822154185
The performance difference would be negligible (firewire 800 will still be the bottleneck I suspect), and the power savings, lower noise, smaller size, etc. make a good case for the extra $65 bucks, but, still, that's $65.
Decisions, decisions...
companies are not lying. they are being completely honest with size. people just assume that it is always written in bytes, either cauz they are not aware of the industry standards, or they just dont know.
Maybe not outright lying, but not exactly honest either. There is a class action lawsuit regarding this...check out http://www.harddrive-settlement.com/
If you're still mulling this over - there's a good review at http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/02/03/the_terabyte_drives_redefine_external_storage/Or, if I go cheap, LaCie Extreme+, $305. 3 year warranty, 7200. Quite a bit bigger, but far more attractive than most 1 TB drives. In RAID 0, so it looks like a single drive to you and the mac.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822154185
And gives you twice the chance of failure. Remember with RAID0 if one drive goes, the whole lot goes.Or, if I go cheap, LaCie Extreme+, $305. 3 year warranty, 7200. Quite a bit bigger, but far more attractive than most 1 TB drives. In RAID 0, so it looks like a single drive to you and the mac.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822154185
And gives you twice the chance of failure. Remember with RAID0 if one drive goes, the whole lot goes.
Three times the chance of failure. The controller can also fail, and if it does you are just as hosed as if a drive fails. And often times controller replacements aren't compatible enough to recognize the data.And gives you twice the chance of failure. Remember with RAID0 if one drive goes, the whole lot goes.