the A95 can do the job.
ieani said:
I have a compact Canon Powershot A95 and am looking for a cheap pocketable ultra compact of at least 3 megapixels I can take with me to concerts. I prefer canon but I need a camera that can shoot in low light without flash. Has anyone had any experience with the Canon SD110? Thanks.
You are working against the laws of physics. Better in low light means just about everything on the camera has to be bigger. A bigger CCD, bigger lens and so on..
The Canon A95 is not really that bad. Take if off the auto setting and shot in full manual mode. Open the f-stops up all the way, choose a shutter speed like 1/60 or (1/30 if you can stand more motion blur) and turn off the flash and use manual focus. and use ISO400 In this mode the A95 has near zero shutter lag. You push the button and the shutter trips instantly.
OK s some images will be to dark. You can "correct" nearly dark images in an image editor. (Like iPhoto, Gimp or Photoshop) It is surprizing what is possable to pull out of images that look nearly black. The quality is not good but, good enough for some uses.
The reason the A95 does so poorly in A or P modes is because (1) it selects a too slow shutter speed and everything blurs. (2) the camer turns on the flash as if that little flash could light up a big stage that is 100 feet aay (not) and (3) the autofocus does not work in the dark and the AF assist beam is even weaker then the strobe (see #2 above)