This is a real tech bonus to an otherwise compelling matchup considering that the Sox and floundering Tigers are fighting it out for wild card spots. I'll check it out.
These things are annoying and clearly Apple-paid promotions. Sure you could use an iPhone for filming sports games, commercials, shows, etc., but no DP or camera operator worth his/her salt would opt for that when professional equipment is available.
Sure you could use an iPhone for filming sports games, commercials, shows, etc., but no DP or camera operator worth his/her salt would opt for that when professional equipment is available.
They will be using four iPhones and it won't only be the dugout. Here is some more detailed coverage.It'll be a dugout camera.
They’re broadcasting at 1080P apparently. Anyone that can see a difference at THAT resolution has a special set of skills.I'd expect this to look pretty jarring compared to the typical broadcast camera I don't think you're going to need an overlay to tell that something is off... but we'll see.
The article basically said they are using the iPhone only for some "easy" shots, or the crown, batting practice, and so on. Not real game shots.Good luck with the limitation of the zoom.🔍 📱⚾🧢
I can almost guarantee there was an incentive to do it this way.Danny Boyle’s latest film, 28 Years Later, was largely shot on iPhone and is a critical and commercial hit.
Looks like the new Black Magic Design iPhone thing. If so, then more than likely some Black Magic Design camera helper app.what is the app they are using to film this?
Well... You do you, I suppose, but... Professional Marketer with 20 years of experience here. If I hire an agency to produce a high quality commercial or video of any sort for me, and they show up with a bunch of iPhones instead of pelican cases and a grip truck, I'm going to fire them on the spot regardless of if they're only using them for b-roll.Professional videographer here. I use an iPhone for b-roll footage. Not everything has to be shot with a high-end professional camera. No camera operator wants to lug 25lbs of gear around when they need something small & nimble.
Right tool for the right job.
I can almost guarantee there was an incentive to do it this way.
Yes, for some. It also highlights the direction the company is trying to take. With next year’s Variable aperture rumored along with the 48MP Ultra Wide stacked sensor and potential 200MP main sensor, many amateurs will be able to skip the DSLR and pick up a Pro phone:Does this really work? I mean, does telling us the phone is being used to film X or Y production (while glossing over the additional hardware/software used in those productions) actually move the needle and convince typical smartphone users to buy a Pro iPhone if they were trying to decide between iPhone models, or between Android phones and iPhones?