The problem is you just can’t get much thinner. The CPUs aren’t getting cooler, quite the opposite. Also people want better GPUs. Again, another esthetic redesign would be a big mistake for the iMac. It’s already too thin as it is, which is creating unnecessary noise and throttling. Only redesign necessary is internal improvements, like better cooling.
You can get much thinner... when they go completely SSD and have finless architecture.The problem is you just can’t get much thinner. The CPUs aren’t getting cooler, quite the opposite. ...
And what's the point of making the casing *even* thinner. It is a stationary computer after all, notI'm not sure if thinness is actually that much of an issue with the current design with regards to thermal issues. I'd argue the biggest issue is that there is currently only one fan for both the CPU and video card. Radeons are not known for being power efficient and the Intel processors are getting a little worse too. Updating the cooling system is probably a necessary thing regardless of design esp if its going to move to Intel's 8th generation processors.
Of course you can always get a thinner iMac, but it would undermine performance and make it a weaker product. It’s not just about the CPU anyway (the next generation will be hotter not cooler), but also the ability to use a powerful GPU.You can get much thinner... when they go completely SSD and have finless architecture.
However, I think that will be the next major redesign, and it will probably come along with the 10nm chips. I'd expect 2019-onward will have a redesign which is thinner and less bezel.
Due to the upcoming leap to 10nm in 2019 (we hope) and 2018 bringing more Intel 14nm chips with more cores, the design probably won't change at all. Might see different port configurations on back, but not much else.
two possible clues:
1. New 6-core Intel cpus - redesigned cooling?
2. LG (iMac lcd supplier, if im not mistaken) just announced (CES) their new 'Nano IPS' dsiplays supporting HDR 600 standard and 98% P3.
Those could be a good basis for a 'redesign', at least from the marketing point of view. In the PC world, apple really does depend on Intel and the likes for basing their 'redesign cadence' strategy.
As far as the looks go, its highly unlikely theyre going to go with the radically new looks so soon after iMac pro. But i really do hope for a drastic internal redesign, better screen, better facetime camera, more mics and a couple of those '50% faster' headlines.
im tired of seeing the pixelsmy late 2012 iMac is getting long in the tooth.
While the 2017 iMacs didn't have top tier GPUs, I don't know if a "mobile" one would be good enough for a follow up. Maybe for the 21" 4k, but definitely not to drive 5K. It would be seen as going backwards.AMD confirmed this week that they are going to release mobile versions of the Vega GPU in the second quarter.
Yeah. I don't understand why they should put mobile GPU again. The GPU was the best upgrade of the new iMac.While the 2017 iMacs didn't have top tier GPUs, I don't know if a "mobile" one would be good enough for a follow up. Maybe for the 21" 4k, but definitely not to drive 5K. It would be seen as going backwards.
I agree. The next iMac generation needs better GPUs, and an iMac Pro-type cooling system. I’m just guessing of course, but it’s interesting looking at the time table for the new hardware parts coming out this year. The present iMac is getting closer to the end of its cycle, but since the last update took almost 2 years, you never know...While the 2017 iMacs didn't have top tier GPUs, I don't know if a "mobile" one would be good enough for a follow up. Maybe for the 21" 4k, but definitely not to drive 5K. It would be seen as going backwards.
I agree. The next iMac generation needs better GPUs, and an iMac Pro-type cooling system. I’m just guessing of course, but it’s interesting looking at the time table for the new hardware parts coming out this year. The present iMac is getting closer to the end of its cycle, but since the last update took almost 2 years, you never know...
Highly probable, likely with Face ID implementation and trim bezels ala iPhone X. Maybe an oled display? The original aluminum iMacs came out after the original iPhone in 2007 and Jobs specifically referenced the shared inspiration. The X is the most significant redesign since the original iPhone, and I suspect something similar for the iMac, which has not seen a significant redesign since 2012, which, itself, was more of an evolution from the 2009 design. And let’s be honest, the iMac has not seen a huge redesign really since the move from the g4 to g5 iMac. I doubt we will see anything too radical at this point, but you never know.How probable is that?
Too soon for FaceID. They still have to raise the numbers high enough to supply new models of iPhones and iPads. Those make the company more money so they are priority. Look how long it took for TouchID to come to Macs. FaceID will probably have to wait another year.
OLED is still too expensive for larger displays. If it can raise the price of 5” iPhone to $1000, can you imagine what a 27” 5k OLED display would cost...
True but...Considering there hasn't been a case redesign since 2012, it is fairly likely
I don't think Apple will release a high end (and very expensive) iMac Pro using a design that will be replaced. That would be imo, a very poor marketing decision on their part.however, since the iMac Pro just came out with the old case people feel that will be the case next year also since its such a new product.
How probable is that?