Hello all. . . I'm new here and semi-new to Macs in general and have been trying to make a decision for several days on what would best suit my needs now and in the future with this investment. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated!
I have a budget of around $2,000 USD and have been eyeballing a base model 27" retina iMac and also the refurbished late 2013 non-retina 27" that comes pretty loaded with an i7, 3tb fusion and 780M 4GB GPU for about the same price as the base retina. I plan to upgrade the memory myself and already have multiple USB 3.0 external storage solutions.
Now I am by no means a power user but I am a stay at home father and a photo/video guru who does a lot of editing in Photoshop and video encoding in premiere/after effects (mostly of my children/family/friends) and would like a machine that can keep up with these tasks today and for a few years to come. Right now I use a 2009 i7 920 desktop and it's just getting a little long in the tooth for me and I'd love to migrate to Mac with Final Cut Pro.
I have seen and tried both side-by-side and from a visual perspective..the retina is certainly slightly nicer to look at and read text on, but it didn't blow my mind by any means compared to the non-retina.
I guess I'm just wondering which would be more future-proof for what I want it for. . . is the i7 and faster GPU with outdated thunderbolt going to cause me buyers remorse later. . . or will the base retina become more outdated as it's refreshed and not realize it's full potential for a couple more years as more content is optimized/produced for it?
HELP ME! :*(
<3
I have a budget of around $2,000 USD and have been eyeballing a base model 27" retina iMac and also the refurbished late 2013 non-retina 27" that comes pretty loaded with an i7, 3tb fusion and 780M 4GB GPU for about the same price as the base retina. I plan to upgrade the memory myself and already have multiple USB 3.0 external storage solutions.
Now I am by no means a power user but I am a stay at home father and a photo/video guru who does a lot of editing in Photoshop and video encoding in premiere/after effects (mostly of my children/family/friends) and would like a machine that can keep up with these tasks today and for a few years to come. Right now I use a 2009 i7 920 desktop and it's just getting a little long in the tooth for me and I'd love to migrate to Mac with Final Cut Pro.
I have seen and tried both side-by-side and from a visual perspective..the retina is certainly slightly nicer to look at and read text on, but it didn't blow my mind by any means compared to the non-retina.
I guess I'm just wondering which would be more future-proof for what I want it for. . . is the i7 and faster GPU with outdated thunderbolt going to cause me buyers remorse later. . . or will the base retina become more outdated as it's refreshed and not realize it's full potential for a couple more years as more content is optimized/produced for it?
HELP ME! :*(
<3