Hi all,
I'm looking at getting an iMac for both work (teaching) and contract work (video editing) - current late 2010 17" MBP just isn't cranking fast enough for FCPX renders.
My question is whether I'd be short-changed getting a top spec refurbished 27" iMac (3.4ghz i7) as opposed to a current (or updated next week if rumours are true) iMac?
Pros of refurbished:
Cost
SuperDrive for clients wanting DVD of events
FW800 AND Thunderbolt - have a bunch of FireWire drives I use for storage, and would rather not use up a thunderbolt port for those.
Cons
Are the previous generation i7's substantially slower than the current ones?
No Fusion drive option (but I could install an SSD)
And am I right in believing that although the specified max ram is 16GB on the previous generation imac, it can actually take 32GB?
As an aside - would the 13" rMBP be a viable portable editing unit?
Thanks for all advice given
I'm looking at getting an iMac for both work (teaching) and contract work (video editing) - current late 2010 17" MBP just isn't cranking fast enough for FCPX renders.
My question is whether I'd be short-changed getting a top spec refurbished 27" iMac (3.4ghz i7) as opposed to a current (or updated next week if rumours are true) iMac?
Pros of refurbished:
Cost
SuperDrive for clients wanting DVD of events
FW800 AND Thunderbolt - have a bunch of FireWire drives I use for storage, and would rather not use up a thunderbolt port for those.
Cons
Are the previous generation i7's substantially slower than the current ones?
No Fusion drive option (but I could install an SSD)
And am I right in believing that although the specified max ram is 16GB on the previous generation imac, it can actually take 32GB?
As an aside - would the 13" rMBP be a viable portable editing unit?
Thanks for all advice given