Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

cohnas

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Aug 3, 2014
2
0
Thanks for previous input on SSD vs Hard drive vs. Fusion in iMac. I am now deciding between SSD and Fusion. I read in one of the Forums that there could be a reliability issue with Fusion due to Hard Drive Failure and that jogged my memory that several yrs ago I had to replace my hard drive. What is the probability of hard drive failure with newer computers--mine now is 8 yrs old. With SSD this not an issue. My one issue with the 256 GB drive, which I may get is running out of memory and needing external storage which I would rather not deal with. I have used only 180-190 out of 500 GB in my 8 year old Mac, so this would probably not be an issue, but who knows what the future holds. Any ideas about this. Thanks in advance for your input.
 
At some point your hard drive will fail, especially a physical drive.

You just need to make sure you have a good robust back up strategy and for a bit of piece of mind get AppleCare.
 
There's really no way to predict a hard drive failure. I've had some die within a year and I have others that are a decade old and still work fine. I'd guess 5-6 years is reasonable, and they might last much longer than that.
 
Macs use just regular hard drives made by the same companies Dell and everyone else uses made by companies like Western Digital and Seagate. They are no better or worse than drives you get in Windows machines and can last years or just up and die in a year sometimes. There is just no way to know.

What you may have read, and this is my concern about Fusion, is with a Fusion you have essentially doubled the chances of failure since you now have a SSD and a HDD "fused" together running as one drive. If either one of those dies, the Fusion drive stops working.

None of this really matters if you are keeping good backups though. Just get the drive replaced and restore from your backup and off you go.
 
Thanks for previous input on SSD vs Hard drive vs. Fusion in iMac. I am now deciding between SSD and Fusion. I read in one of the Forums that there could be a reliability issue with Fusion due to Hard Drive Failure and that jogged my memory that several yrs ago I had to replace my hard drive. What is the probability of hard drive failure with newer computers--mine now is 8 yrs old. With SSD this not an issue. My one issue with the 256 GB drive, which I may get is running out of memory and needing external storage which I would rather not deal with. I have used only 180-190 out of 500 GB in my 8 year old Mac, so this would probably not be an issue, but who knows what the future holds. Any ideas about this. Thanks in advance for your input.

On my 21.5" iMac, I have a 256GB SSD, which I chose just for the sake of pure speed and reliability.

I keep all my media files externally.
 
What is the probability of hard drive failure with newer computers--mine now is 8 yrs old. With SSD this not an issue.

To be clear: this isn't true. SSDs do fail over time as well. It's just that their mechanism of failure is different from a hard drive.

- Hard drives can fall as a result of their moving parts (spinning platters, flying heads that could crash)

- SSDs wear over time, particularly each time new data is written to it. There are other limitations too: See this section on limitations for possible failure modes.

- BOTH SSD and HDD storage can fail as a result of issues like firmware bugs, poor soldering of controller electronics, and other design flaws.

All storage has a potential for failure. SSD is not immune. The way around this is to have backups of your data.
 
Some good advice in the above posts. Here's a good article concerning this issue. It's from 2011 but still interesting. I will link to the "final words" summary page, but read the whole thing if you're interested: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-reliability-failure-rate,2923-9.html

Essentially, yes SSDs can and will still fail. The more drives you have, the more likely you are to see a failure in a given amount of time. So a fusion drive will be inherently more failure prone.

My advice? (I have a fusion drive!) Get AppleCare for three years, and if your fusion drive fails after that time maybe SSD sizes will be large enough and affordable enough for you to replace the fusion with a single SSD.

Or just upgrade every three years as AppleCare runs out.
 
All I can say is that my track record has been top notch with HDD's (even in RAID) and my iMac is no different (after from I have only had it for a year).
 
On my 21.5" iMac, I have a 256GB SSD, which I chose just for the sake of pure speed and reliability.

I keep all my media files externally.

+1

I do the same thing: music and video on a portable hard drive (that is powered off USB) and OS, apps, and all other files on the internal SSD. Works great for me.
 
+1

I do the same thing: music and video on a portable hard drive (that is powered off USB) and OS, apps, and all other files on the internal SSD. Works great for me.

While I'm happy with my HDD and have never really found a big difference between SSD and HDD, this is a good setup.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.