Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jimN

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jun 23, 2005
942
18
London
Just wondering what people's thoughts are on us seeing a remote control (possibly bluetooth) release to accompany Front Row when it finally comes to PPC machines (officially) with the release of Leopard.

Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere.
 
Yeah, for better or worse, Apple doesn't really have a good track record with making these kinds of concessions for users of older hardware. They would really like you (and me... I have no Apple remotes either) to upgrade.

Otherwise, there are several options ranging from existing dedicated remotes such as Keyspan to using bluetooth cellphones with software like Sailing Clicker. See here and here. These work now with Front Row, so it's reasonable to assume they'll be adapted (if necessary) to continue working with FR under Leopard.

So those are also essentially your options if you end up in the (probably unlikely) position of wanting to run Front Row from a Mac Pro.
 
Just buy a IR receiver and a apple remote and your good to go. Thats what i have for my mac pro....So all you will need is front row but that will come.
 
I often use my power book connected to my tv to watch movies and TV shows and I would prefer not to have to plug in an IR receiver. I appreciate that Apple would rather I just upgrade. Oh well. I'll just have to keep my fingers crossed and wait and see.
 
I often use my power book connected to my tv to watch movies and TV shows and I would prefer not to have to plug in an IR receiver. I appreciate that Apple would rather I just upgrade. Oh well. I'll just have to keep my fingers crossed and wait and see.

you have to plug in another IR receiver, your pb doesnt have an IR port of its own for youd obviously need a 3rd party option
 
does any company? ;)

I don't blame Apple, but does any company have a better track record than Apple in supporting legacy hardware? Yeah, I think honestly, some do. Microsoft enabled all the Zune 2 features on the original Zune via an update. They're even the same company that went out of their way to make USB bluetooth dongles available so that their bluetooth keyboards and mice could be usable on Windows PCs that didn't have them.

I'm not saying I want to go back to Windows. I'm just saying that, yes, companies differ on what they offer to their customers. This particular thing is not a strength of Apple's.
 
if you install leopard onto your ppc machines without doubt you will have to enable FR somehow (i read how to somewhere in these forums ???).

I don't blame Apple, but does any company have a better track record than Apple in supporting legacy hardware? Yeah, I think honestly, some do. Microsoft enabled all the Zune 2 features on the original Zune via an update. They're even the same company that went out of their way to make USB bluetooth dongles available so that their bluetooth keyboards and mice could be usable on Windows PCs that didn't have them.

I'm not saying I want to go back to Windows. I'm just saying that, yes, companies differ on what they offer to their customers. This particular thing is not a strength of Apple's.

that is not that far apart from the itunes/ipod thing. apple made it so that the average computer user HAS to use itunes. meaning that itunes must be bought (yes it comes with the ipod i know). but people would have to download the software. which could mean some potential switchers to apple software, which could inevitably make them use macs. :) its all about the marketing and potential switchers.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.