Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Apple faced pressure from the White House to use Intel's chipmaking plants while it was negotiating relief from semiconductor tariffs last summer, reports The Wall Street Journal ($).

Tim-Cook-and-Donald-Trump.jpg

In August 2025, Apple CEO Tim Cook was in Washington to lobby the Trump administration to drop its proposed 100 percent tariff on semiconductor imports – a levy that would have raised costs across Apple's product line. Apple reportedly secured an exemption after pledging to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S., although many of those investments were already planned.

During the meetings, president Trump and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick are said to have urged Cook to use Intel's fabrication plants to make some of Apple's chips. The link between the tariff talks and the Apple-Intel deal had not been previously reported.

Almost a year later, Trump announced via his Truth Social platform that Apple would begin using Intel-made chips in some products. "We need to design and build our Chips right here in America," the president posted. The news sent Intel shares to record highs.

According to a person familiar with the negotiations cited by the WSJ, Apple plans to have Intel make chips for both Mac laptops and iPhones. The report doesn't say which chips or in what volume, and Apple is expected to remain reliant on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC, for the majority of its custom silicon.

Apple hasn't looked to Intel as a supplier before, both because the chipmaker has trailed rivals like TSMC and Samsung and due to the rocky history between the two companies.

The report suggests the arrangement is part of a wider administration effort to prop up Intel, especially since the U.S. government converted $9 billion in federal grants into a 10 percent equity stake last year, making it the chipmaker's largest shareholder.

Nvidia and SpaceX have also signed deals with Intel since then, reportedly with similar pressure applied by the Trump administration.

Intel's foundry business posted $10.4 billion in operating losses over its last four fiscal quarters, and outside customers have in recent years doubted its ability to reliably produce usable silicon at a high volume. The WSJ report gives no timeline for when Intel-made chips might appear in shipping Apple products, and Apple has not commented on the arrangement.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Report: Apple Agreed to Intel Chips Amid White House Tariff Talks
 
  • Wow
  • Haha
Reactions: Z-4195 and SFjohn
Could INTEL help Apple with the SDD / RAM Shortage? Which is the biggest worry for all of tech right now.
Intel last made memory in 1985 and storage they sold off in 2020. So short answer is no. Could they retool some fabs to make memory and storage? I don’t know, but even if they can, it would likely take a long time to get things operational and with sufficiently high yield to make a difference.
 
The doom and gloom comments are funny. People are acting like "Intel" automatically means disaster, yet Mac users were perfectly happy buying Intel based Macs for well over a decade.
What's even funnier is people who can't seem to comprehend the difference between Intel manufacturing Apple-designed chips and chips that are of Intel design. Intel using their fabrication factories to make Apple Silicon or other Apple designs are not "Intel Inside".
 
The doom and gloom comments are funny. People are acting like "Intel" automatically means disaster, yet Mac users were perfectly happy buying Intel based Macs for well over a decade.

And then were not happy with those chips after roughly a decade as we watched AMD and ARM take massive strides forward while Intel seemingly stood still. A decade is a long time, and the lack of progress from Intel was well-documented. It was constant promises and bluster that was never delivered upon (that sounds familiar…). People have every right to be disappointed in this because Intel disappointed millions at that time (and their reputation has yet to recover).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.