Watch it be only search engine on apple products.....with a monthly subscription and in app purchases for more results or to get rid of ads.
You have to factor in the antitrust inquiries. Having google pay is the best alternative, but if they take it away, having an own search engine making a couple bucks is better than having a search engine selector for free.So Apple will spend a huge amount of money creating their own search engine, that they won’t make nearly as much $ on because of their privacy stance, and then lose that $8-12 billion from Google, only to have the majority of their users still set Google as the default search engine because it simply is better? Shareholders will love this.
Well since this will take years in court Apple has plenty of time to figure it all out. As they always doRumors have been around for a long time.
Let's keep in mind here that using Google as a search engine is quite lucrative for Apple as it is.
Also Google is making money from the searches thru aggressive tracking and collection of private data, which Apple opposes.
So having their own search engine would lose a lot of money for Apple, and I think that's quite unlikely.
I’ve used Bing over Google for years for media searches because it’s waaaay better. As of late general searches have been better too.I use BING, and I ABSOLUTELY LOVE IT!!! Never going back ❤️❤️❤️
You are genuinely tripping!I've tried DuckDuckGo and Bing. For complex searches, Google is MILES ahead. So annoying that we can't just have the best as default.
PINGAnd what it will be called? I'd love to hear fun ideas.
And what it will be called? I'd love to hear fun ideas.
I'd go further, if it is sufficiently neutral, it might become popular on non-Apple platforms as well.I mean, they can make their own search engine without forcing it on people. If it's an option people can choose, rather than one that's forced on them, there wouldn't be any potential antitrust issues. Of course, that way most people wouldn't pick it for a long time, so they'd have to actually make it a really strong competitor to win marketshare.
You are right, but people are more or less used to searching only with keywords instead of whole sentences. It will get to the next stage once people start using voice search more and more.You are genuinely tripping!
Search (presumably due to almost ZERO competition) has progressed less than any other heavily used technology in the last decade.
Think about how much better gps has got in the last 10 years- it’s barely a similar experience to what it was.
Now consider lame ass search...
Natural language is near nonexistent.
In 2010 I couldn’t type: “hey, where can I find the cheapest transmission near me?”; like one normally talks... instead, I craft a cumbersome computer talk query like: “inexpensive auto parts transmission 2012 Jaguar XJL North Central Florida”.
Now that it’s 2020..... oh wait; it still works EXACTLY the same way!
There is nearly nothing that feels “advanced”, or even approaches “peak search performance” in search engines right now.
Anyone harboring the delusion that search is in anything but its infancy, either doesn’t search much, or spends a lot of time chatting up robots, not humans.
I personally, can easily imagine how much better search would currently be, had Apple & Google been viciously competing in that area for the last decade...
Stepping off my soapbox now, but Christ, the haughty “I lack vision & think the garbage I use is top-notch, thus it bothers me if there’s any upcoming option or alternative that may make things better for everyone” attitude is SO pompous with no reason to be.
Chicken & egg, though...You are right, but people are more or less used to searching only with keywords instead of whole sentences. It will get to the next stage once people start using voice search more and more.
Apple SeachAnd what it will be called? I'd love to hear fun ideas.
And what it will be called? I'd love to hear fun ideas.
They have time? Right? No need to rush anything into production, straight from development and skip the Q&A..I don't think it's a very good idea considering how bloody long it took Apple Maps to find its feet (and is still struggling outside of the U.S.)
If Apple’s search would be the equivalent of their Maps/Translation offerings, I’m so in. I left Google Maps the day Apple launched Maps. A few early hiccups aside, it easily meets my needs. I want as little Google in my life as is possible. Search, most unfortunately, is the only thing I can’t seem to fully transition. Yet.I would absolutely LOVE if Apple came up with a great (private, reliable) search engine.
Unfortunately I feel like it will be like Maps (for which I still use Google Maps) or Translate (yep, I prefer Google’s again).
I really really want to get away from Google entirely. But I also want the best results from when I search for things. Here’s hoping Apple will eventually catch up and make their versions more effective...
Siri Search+And what it will be called? I'd love to hear fun ideas.
These rumours have been around since 10 years at least. Yawn.
And what it will be called? I'd love to hear fun ideas.