Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple immediately needs to create agentic tool instructions for all their APIs. Then they need to give Siri access to all the APIs so that Siri can create apps on demand. This would be a lot more useful than having users create spreadsheets or word documents.

Really they should buy out Replit which can do the same. Let people create little apps on demand on their phones/laptops. This would be like writing shell scripts, but for apps.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: wilhoitm
Apple is finally admitting through this restructuring under Craig Federighi that its internal AI efforts have dragged on for years due to delays, friction, and a conservative mindset that prioritized cost control and predictability over bold innovation. Relying on Google's Gemini models to finally deliver a meaningful Siri overhaul feels like a concession that Apple's own foundation models weren't cutting it.
 
Siri, create a timer for 30 minutes and remind me when there are 5 minutes remaining.
Siri creates a timer for 35 minutes.

Just fix Siri's understanding and ability to parse complex instructions so I don't have to talk like a robot to get the robot to understand me. That's the only thing you need to do. Everything else is icing on the cake. But currently the cake is the size of a cookie and there is a gallon of the worst-tasting, gritty icing with a bad chemical aftertaste stacked on top.
 
Well he’s right on that point, dynamically moving people’s apps around is a terrible idea.

I want my apps where I left them, otherwise you would have to go hunting every time you want to open an app.
This is the ideal mobile interface:

microslop.jpg


You may not like it, but this is what peak UX looks like.
 
How many times can they reset, start over, firm up, shift, staff up, cycle out, pivot, flesh out, etc?

They do everything other than "deliver anything functional and good".
Yes indeed, this is the first time in decades that Apple seems so lost and desperate.

Flailing around like a fish out of water, the Cupertino company continues to look bad as they grasp for straws.

As a shareholder it’s concerning.
As an observer it’s rather entertaining.
 


Apple has restructured its artificial intelligence strategy under software chief Craig Federighi, accelerating plans to overhaul Siri by relying on external AI models after years of internal delays and organizational friction.

craig-federighi-wwdc-2018.jpeg

According to a detailed report from The Information, Apple's approach to artificial intelligence has undergone a significant shift over the past year. Apple software chief Craig Federighi is said to be at the center of that shift, having assumed direct oversight of the company's AI organization and is now driving decisions that will shape the future of Siri and other Apple Intelligence features across the product lineup.

Last fall, Federighi apparently addressed a joint meeting of Apple's software and AI teams, expressing enthusiasm for closer collaboration while also signaling dissatisfaction with the company's pace of progress in artificial intelligence. Some members of Apple's foundation models team interpreted the remarks as criticism of their work.

In December, Apple moved to consolidate its AI leadership under Federighi, completing a transition that had begun earlier in the year when responsibility for Siri was removed from the AI group and brought under Federighi's software division. In January, Apple announced plans to use Google's Gemini AI models to power future AI upgrades, including an improved version of Siri. In Federighi's view, integrating a third-party model would allow Apple to finally ship a revamped Siri later this year after controversially postponing the update in 2025.

However, the report also outlines internal concerns about the implications of placing AI under Federighi's control. People who have worked closely with him described him as highly cost-conscious and skeptical of investments with uncertain returns. This approach stands in notable contrast to rivals such as OpenAI, Meta Platforms, and Google, who invest tens of billions of dollars in data centers, chips, and AI researchers.

Apple has attempted to limit infrastructure spending by emphasizing on-device processing and its Private Cloud Compute system, which uses Apple silicon. The company was said to be waiting for the cost of AI computation and talent to decline, betting that most consumer use cases will eventually be handled locally on devices.

Federighi apparently viewed AI as unpredictable and difficult to control, preferring deterministic software behavior that could be clearly specified during design reviews. He rejected proposals to use AI to dynamically reorganize the iPhone home screen, arguing that such changes would confuse users.

Tensions over AI strategy have surfaced internally before. Around 2019, Mike Rockwell, who was leading development of the Vision Pro headset, reportedly proposed an AI-driven interface. He criticized Federighi's software approach as overly conservative, prompting a rebuke. Rockwell was later placed in charge of Siri in early 2025 and now reports directly to Federighi.

Despite his earlier skepticism, Federighi's stance shifted following the release of ChatGPT in late 2022. People close to him said he became convinced of the potential of large language models after experimenting with the technology and instructed his teams to explore ways to integrate similar capabilities into Apple products. Federighi reportedly concluded that Apple's internal models did not perform adequately on devices, while members of the foundation models team believed they were being blamed for challenges related to model optimization, which fell under the software organization's responsibilities.

Some team members complained they were not given sufficient guidance on how their models would ultimately be used, limiting their ability to compete with external alternatives. Around the time Apple removed Siri oversight from Giannandrea and assigned it to Rockwell, with Federighi directing the broader effort, Federighi instructed teams to evaluate deep integration of third-party models.

Despite the partnership with Google, Apple plans to continue developing its own AI models, particularly those designed to run on devices. Apple reportedly intends to shrink and adapt models derived from external partners so they can run more fully on Apple hardware, reducing long-term dependence. To support that goal, Apple is said to be considering acquisitions of smaller AI firms specializing in model compression and optimization.

See The Information's full report for more.

Article Link: Report: Apple's New AI Strategy Firms Up Under Craig Federighi
Sweet Google what a mess. Hopefully Craig can fix it. Give him the reigns and lets get on with it.
 
…while also signaling dissatisfaction with the company's pace of progress in artificial intelligence. Some members of Apple's foundation models team interpreted the remarks as criticism of their work.
You’re ranked among the most valuable companies in the world and you’re losing the AI race by a mile. You deserve every ounce of criticism, especially after what was announced at WWDC 2024.
 
Well yeah, wouldn’t we all. But Siri sucks because Apple has been dropping the ball for 15 years now, it has nothing to do with “AI.”
Your phone can execute a lot of actions via your input. It can handle more complex multi-part commands via Shortcuts. The AI is getting Siri to be able to parse the complicated command you made. It has to understand it and turn it into a series of system commands. The functionality is there, but it needs AI to turn human language into machine language. That's why the Gemini partnership is a big deal, because Siri is now going to learn how to listen better. It's not just that Gemini can do more than Siri currently, it's that Gemini uses AI to parse human language better.
 
Your phone can execute a lot of actions via your input. It can handle more complex multi-part commands via Shortcuts. The AI is getting Siri to be able to parse the complicated command you made. It has to understand it and turn it into a series of system commands. The functionality is there, but it needs AI to turn human language into machine language. That's why the Gemini partnership is a big deal, because Siri is now going to learn how to listen better. It's not just that Gemini can do more than Siri currently, it's that Gemini uses AI to parse human language better.

That’s how it works now. But Siri has sucked pretty much since Day 1 while Google and freaking Amazon managed to lap Apple year after year.
 
However, the report also outlines internal concerns about the implications of placing AI under Federighi's control. People who have worked closely with him described him as highly cost-conscious and skeptical of investments with uncertain returns
Of course, knowing how to run a successful business will be seen as a bad thing here (and I’m not a big Federighi fan) 🙄
 
In other words: Apple has
acknowledged defeat in the a.i. race and has decided to buy someone else’s a.i.

Kinda like what android phone makers are doing- using Android instead of making their own OS.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: bluecoast
This sort of strategy worked pretty well on the Mac side.

Have something that isn’t working (PowerPC)
Go with a new partner to get back on track (Intel) < You are here
Develop an in-house replacement in parallel and release it when it’s ready (Apple Silicon)

For the purpose of making this analogy work I am purposefully ignoring the Motorola era of Mac because uh I can’t figure out how to squeeze it in there and this sounded way cooler in my head than when I actually typed it out.
 
Your phone can execute a lot of actions via your input. It can handle more complex multi-part commands via Shortcuts. The AI is getting Siri to be able to parse the complicated command you made. It has to understand it and turn it into a series of system commands. The functionality is there, but it needs AI to turn human language into machine language. That's why the Gemini partnership is a big deal, because Siri is now going to learn how to listen better. It's not just that Gemini can do more than Siri currently, it's that Gemini uses AI to parse human language better.
Arguably apples Intents are so much more powerful and much better implemented in third parties that if you had an advanced AI that could link into apples intents system it would instantly leapfrog any AI implementation of phone assistant in Samsung/Googles phones. (Their implementation is also struggling on mobile people don’t talk about it bc general Gemini is so advantaged but it’s not as good as google assistant at phone management. Oh and it’s also available on iOS people keep forgetting this.)

For me I’ve been happy with Siri+shortcuts on the phone. It works really well. I really like Siri for controlling Apple TV and for doing basic things on my phone. It’s terrible at
World information compared to Gemini but you tell it to send the question to Gemini or ChatGPT. I find that better for piece of mind bc I fool myself that it allows less information to leak into massive datasets. Bc apple like privacy right? Right?!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.