looking forward to this device. i don't mind that it runs the iphone os, as long as all my apps work with it!
Sorry but I don't see anything compelling in your post. We already have these things called 'laptops'.
People, if the tablet doesn't seem like it's going to be useful for you, you are not the intended market for it. You don't have to buy it. You can get the macbook instead. It's not going to replace it.
There are people with desktops only (or even if they have iPhones) who'll want the tablet to carry with them around the house to do stuff. Imagine eating breakfast and you want to read the news or a book, you can take the tablet down to the kitchen and eat there. Or if you're cooking and you want to check emails or whatever social networking you want to do. What about staying outside or in the balcony to enjoy the sunny weather? How about working on the car in the garage and you need to figure out how to fix something, you can just use the tablet instead of going up to your room to check on the internet.
Now, you can say that iphone can do all of those, yes on a 3" screen. But not everybody have an iphone and yes while they can get iPod Touch, they might not want the 3" screen as it might be too small for them. 10" might be perfect size for all people including elderly.
Suspect you've closed your mind. But, you can't curl up with a laptop, perhaps you can, I can't. Which laptop do you have that has touch and can run all of those apps? Which laptop do you have that has the Pixel Qi screen for eReading? I'm really ready to follow you, I'm not a leader, perhaps you are.
I'm just surprised that people are SHOCKED that it's just a big iphone. That's all it was ever meant to be.
I don't need a laptop that can have a touch screen. I type 84 words per minute. How many can you write?
Look, this product will appeal to some people. I have a macbook, it suits all these needs just find. This is going to be a color kindle with a really nice screen or a big iphone. If you like it, go buy it.
I'm just surprised that people are SHOCKED that it's just a big iphone. That's all it was ever meant to be.
I don't need a laptop that can have a touch screen. I type 84 words per minute. How many can you write?
Look, this product will appeal to some people. I have a macbook, it suits all these needs just find. This is going to be a color kindle with a really nice screen or a big iphone. If you like it, go buy it.
I'm just surprised that people are SHOCKED that it's just a big iphone. That's all it was ever meant to be.
I'm SHOCKED that you know what the product actually is, you impress me.
Let me be fair. I want to be able to annotate, it's not speed it's convenience. I hold the device with one hand and write with the other, it's really meant for thoughts, not speed. I do agree you can type faster, but I just want to take notes while concentrating on the speaker or reading, whatever. There are multiple ways of providing input, I want them all.
What I'm slightly annoyed about is that people are making so many different opinions, ideas, decisions, and assumptions on a product that they haven't seen.
Just...wait....till...it...is...out, that's all people have to do.
The other point is that even though a laptop can do everything the tablet can (assuming that's true), eventually people get to the point where it's time to consider buying a new laptop, and if the tablet does everything they need - but cheaper and in a more intuitive and user-friendly way - they'll likely buy the tablet.
Don't worry, I won't be here to rain on your parade while you guys are gushing and crying about how Jobs is the second coming of Jesus and the iSlate is the most amazing device, how he's the only one who could have possibly thought of it and how Apple is the most amazing company known to man, my god it's like they're a part of you, and all you can do is try to keep your trembling hands steady enough for a few line drawings in iPaint and musings in iScrawl.
Well, maybe I will.
Except it's running the iPhone version of OSX. When Logic gets ported to it I'll think about it. Here are some things that it would take to impress me:
1) Completely waterproof.
2) You can turn the power off, and the next 50 or so pages are stored in a capacitor and can be read.
3) Battery life of over 20 hours with full usage.
The other point is that even though a laptop can do everything the tablet can (assuming that's true), eventually people get to the point where it's time to consider buying a new laptop, and if the tablet does everything they need - but cheaper and in a more intuitive and user-friendly way - they'll likely buy the tablet.
That's if the tablet is a laptop competitor. As of right now, most believe that it can't even connect to a USB drive. How can you backup your tablet if that's the case?
In order for it to replace a laptop, it has to replace its most basic duties. Right now a $300 netbook can do all of this and more. Multitouch may be more fun and intuitive but you're asking them to spend extra in a slowly recovering economy.
We don't know what's coming and I hope that Apple introduces something truly revolutionary.
Like it or not there are a tremendous number of people who don't back up their stuff and don't want to. If a tablet stores data in the cloud or "syncs" like an ipod, they're thrilled with that. The tablet may not be for you, but it's for a lot of other people. It doesn't have to do all the things a netbook can - it only has to do all the things a large number of people need it to do. As a business traveller I can tell you that even a simple tablet with Apple's attention to detail is incredibly relevant - the ability to view and lightly annotate business docs (office formats and pdf), send and receive email, maybe show powerpoint/keynote presentations, maybe video conference, surf the web, with ipod media functions, all in a package that's no bigger and no heavier than it needs to be, is incredibly compelling to someone who spends a lot of time on planes and in hotel rooms. Yeah, I can do that with a laptop, but why carry weight to support things I don't need (keyboard, optical drive, fans, bigger batteries to support x86, etc.)
People, if the tablet doesn't seem like it's going to be useful for you, you are not the intended market for it. You don't have to buy it. You can get the macbook instead. It's not going to replace it.
But where's is it syncing to in the cloud?
Apple has just started hiring to move iWork into the cloud. They currently have no music, TV and movie subscriptions in place. The latter two will take years just for a US deal. If it still syncs to your computer, then on the road you have nothing if you have to restore.
Apple currently stores no info of the app you have to easily restore. You either have to guess, take a screenshot or keep all the receipts of all the apps you purchased. You are asking Apple to think of all of this on a 1.0 product that is based on the iPhone OS.
Let's say that the tablet weighs around 2 lbs.. Is it really going to break your back to carry 3 extra lbs.for a MBP? You've been getting along so far and if weight was that much of an issue you could get an MBA which would be 1lbs. more. Chances are very likely that both machines will give you far more power and the full potential of OSX.
That's if the tablet is a laptop competitor. As of right now, most believe that it can't even connect to a USB drive. How can you backup your tablet if that's the case?
In order for it to replace a laptop, it has to replace its most basic duties. Right now a $300 netbook can do all of this and more. Multitouch may be more fun and intuitive but you're asking them to spend extra in a slowly recovering economy.
We don't know what's coming and I hope that Apple introduces something truly revolutionary.
Okay, you no longer impress me. You seem to be too impressed with the mirror. I, I, I, me, me, me.
People, if the tablet doesn't seem like it's going to be useful for you, you are not the intended market for it. You don't have to buy it. You can get the macbook instead. It's not going to replace it.
There are people with desktops only (or even if they have iPhones) who'll want the tablet to carry with them around the house to do stuff. Imagine eating breakfast and you want to read the news or a book, you can take the tablet down to the kitchen and eat there. Or if you're cooking and you want to check emails or whatever social networking you want to do. What about staying outside or in the balcony to enjoy the sunny weather? How about working on the car in the garage and you need to figure out how to fix something, you can just use the tablet instead of going up to your room to check on the internet.
Now, you can say that iphone can do all of those, yes on a 3" screen. But not everybody have an iphone and yes while they can get iPod Touch, they might not want the 3" screen as it might be too small for them. 10" might be perfect size for all people including elderly.
Exactley! If the tablet runs the iPhone OS then we wont be able to put our software on it. Photoshop would be awesome on a tablet. Just doesnt make sense to me.
It'll just sync via iTunes. The software is there, all Apple has to do is update iTunes and it'll be just like iPhone sync.
Tablets or more specifically slates are not laptop replacements. It's a third form of computing. Desktops, laptops and slates can co-exist just like tablets has been co-existing for the past few decades. People with desktops can get slates instead of laptops if they choose.
People please fix this wrong idea in your heads, tablets/slates are not laptop or netbook replacements.
But if you can do all those things, and more, for a laptop or netbook that costs hundreds less, why would you buy a tablet?
Who says that you won't be able to get Photoshop for the iSlate?
The iPhone OS and the Mac OS are both OS-X, just with different User interfaces on top. It is the (lack of) power of the CPU and GPU that will limit what you can realistically do with the iSlate, not the OS.
Why buy 1500$ laptop when people can do the same thing on a netbook for 300$?
Hell, why buy Macbook Air when you can get macbook 500$ cheaper? Why buy 13" MBP when you can get plastic white macbook for 300-400$ cheaper?
They all have pros and cons.
Slates are more comfortable than laptop or netbooks if people just want to consume data in living room watching tv, reading book on the tablet in bed or any other situation where laptops are too heavy and netbook is just too small/keyboard not needed/whatever.
What can you do with this "third form of computing" that you can't do with the devices you already have?
That's the mystery. We all agree that it doesn't replace a notebook or a desktop or a phone or a netbook. What things does it do better than all those other devices.... so much better that millions of people will step up to buy?
What can you do with this "third form of computing" that you can't do with the devices you already have?
That's the mystery. We all agree that it doesn't replace a notebook or a desktop or a phone or a netbook. What things does it do better than all those other devices.... so much better that millions of people will step up to buy?