And the developement of chrome os seems at lightspeed compared to Apple’s iOS.Don't dismiss ChromeOS
It's remarkably capable and need fulfilling for a LOT of usage types
That didn’t take long. 😄I do 98% of my professional job on the road with my iPad Pro + Magic Keyboard and have very few issues. I finally upgraded from 11" to 13" last week but that's just personal preference.
Could you tell me why this is unique to me? I use Office, Teams, Acrobat, web apps, etc, all of which are handled just fine by the IPP, and it's so much more enjoyable to use than a Mac laptop because of the size/convenience/touchscreen.
So..what am I missing?
Some of the criticism of iPadOS is because people are trying to shoehorn legacy desktop OS workflows onto a tablet OS and are frustrated it's not as capable. But there are some legitimate shortcomings to iPadOS:So..what am I missing?
And, make no mistake, price is going to become more important for many Americans going forward - no matter how much they make like iPads.iPads are getting pricier and the cheapest one with a keyboard costs three times a ChromeBook.
It is surely a much better device but lame ChromeBooks may be good enough for 99% of iPad's use cases. Many people just need something to browse the internet that's bigger than a phone.
With a better strategy, Google has a lot of room to compete.
You could have made this case 5+ years ago, but not anymore. There are still frustrating limitations but I use iPads for roughly 50% of my work: Zoom calls, email, social media graphic design, reading books, writing a book, web browsing, teaching, translating, signing documents, messaging apps etc. I could do much of this on my MacBook but it's far more enjoyable on an iPad or on iPhone for maximum mobility. The "let's be honest" manipulative language doesn't make up for a weak, pleading argument.Let's be honest, high end iPad's are mostly for media consumption as well. I know I'll hear it from "content creators" or "influencers" who "make their living on an iPad", however creating anything on an iPad Pro is tedious at best (email, Numbers, Pages, Keynote, iMovie, GarageBand, etc.), and impossible for stuff like software development, Fusion 360, PrusaSlicer, transcoding video such as DVD/Blu-rays etc.
Yes, there are unique situations where the iPad excels, but let's be honest, those are few and far between. That's all on Apple for putting a phone OS on a tablet. For anyone who does work, you need a Mac well over 98% of the time, if not more.
You mean to bring back a pixel branded laptop? Because they already made the Chromebook pixel, long before even the pixel line of phones existed.Google is developing a high-end Pixel-branded laptop, which could potentially showcase the new desktop-oriented Android platform.
Lets be honest, the iPad is perfect for that kind of small stuff here and there, but even my kids who are forced to use them at school comment on how they’d much rather use a laptop.You could have made this case 5+ years ago, but not anymore. There are still frustrating limitations but I use iPads for roughly 50% of my work: Zoom calls, email, social media graphic design, reading books, writing a book, web browsing, teaching, translating, signing documents, messaging apps etc. I could do much of this on my MacBook but it's far more enjoyable on an iPad or on iPhone for maximum mobility. The "let's be honest" manipulative language doesn't make up for a weak, pleading argument.
The US Govt is about to change hands. If there is any antitrust action it will either be part of a shakedown and/or a reward to a well-connected competitor.Interested to see how this plays with the US govt wanting Google to step back from Android integrations… Especially when Musk gets his paws in the soup.