Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Memory could account for as much as 45 percent of an iPhone's component costs by 2027, up from around 10 percent today, according to a JPMorgan analysis cited by the Financial Times ($).

iPhone-17-Pro-and-Air-Feature.jpg

Apple buys memory for roughly 250 million iPhones a year and has historically been one of the largest customers in the category. But Apple has reportedly now gone from a position where it could set terms to one where it now has to compete with rivals for supply.

The principal reason is the heavily subsidized AI build-out that's underway.

In a race to make data centers that can handle more compute for frontier AI models, AI infrastructure buyers like Nvidia are now reportedly outbidding consumer electronics makers for limited supply from the likes of Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Meanwhile, cloud companies are reportedly making upfront payments worth billions of dollars to secure capacity.

It's a marked break from the industry norm of committing to volumes with suppliers first and negotiating prices later.

The pressure is already reshaping Apple's product plans, and the rumored split-launch cycle for the iPhone 18 series is said to be part of that new reality. Apple is expected to stagger the iPhone 18 launch, holding the lower-priced model until spring 2027 rather than shipping the full lineup in the usual fall window. Instead, only the iPhone 18 Pro models will be launched in September, with a foldable iPhone expected to be unveiled around the same time.

Apple hardware engineering chief John Ternus takes over from Tim Cook as CEO on September 1, and Cook will transition to his new role as Apple's first executive chair, where he is expected to take a direct role in day-to-day operations. Meanwhile, Ternus's first big decision will be whether Apple absorbs the increasing cost of memory or passes it onto consumers.

Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan reckons the decision could come down to whether Apple holds prices to please consumers or accepts a margin hit, especially in markets like India and China where it competes with local smartphone makers. "By the time September rolls around, Apple has two choices: one, they reprice [products] higher, or two, they say 'let's go ahead and gun for market share,'" Mohan told the FT. He thinks there is a decent chance that Apple will opt for market share.

Article Link: Report: iPhone Memory Costs Set to Quadruple by 2027
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: CoMoMacUser
Apple will likely raise prices modestly. Who is really going to struggle with this are most of the smartphone manufacturers who have slim to no margins. It’s likely the inexpensive smartphones are going to increase substantially in price.
 
I think they'll go for market share. All their main products are in an excellent place, market share is going up even for the Mac. Now is the time to strike.

Once people dip their toes in they generally just keep buying more Apple products and getting invested into the ecosystem.
 
I like how MacRumors are talking like the split launch of iPhone 18 series as fact when at this stage its just a rumour!
 
This year they will keep prices the same I assume. A potential huge price hike may come next year for the 20th anniversary model where Apple can raise the price justifying it with a completely new generation of design etc. Just like in 2017 with the introduction of the X.
 
Heres an idea....CANT AI SOLVE ITS OWN RAM CRISIS? I mean for me i use it as a chat bot to vent to, get reasonable accurate info for, and to occasionally generate a silly image. But the damn thing is supposed to cure cancer and change the world for the better apparently if you believe the hype. Cant it fix the problem its causing? Wouldn't that be a good proof of its abilities beyond a chat bot and image/video generator?
 
I guess iPhone 18 pro will be a supercycle if people FOMO into the idea that iPhone 19 pro will be $200 more expensive. I’m due for an upgrade anyway, but I can see others forcing an upgrade to avoid a possible price hike. It happened with GPUs in 2025.
 
IMO, Nvidia are just greedily milking the AI bubble before it bursts, when there will be just a few AI players left. As often, Apple seem to have chosen to “wait and see” how this AI commotion plays out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: k1121j and arkitect
I felt a bit bad when upgrading from my 15 Plus to the 17 Pro, because my 15 Plus was still working very well. Now, I’m starting to think maybe it was a good move to get a Pro model before the RAM apocalypse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drunkaviator
I felt a bit bad when upgrading from my 15 Plus to the 17 Pro, because my 15 Plus was still working very well. Now, I’m starting to think maybe it was a good move to get a Pro model before the RAM apocalypse.
Nothing to feel bad about, in hindsight a great decision. The 17 Pro is the first iPhone that really fills me with confidence about its longevity, especially given the excellent battery life, the whole package generally feels very complete and mature. My battery is holding at 100% after 156 cycles too.
 
Surely if RAM prices are increasing for Apple, they are increasing much more for the "local smartphone makers" - they order in smaller quantities and seem to use more RAM per phone than Apple has historically? Thus they would have to raise prices too and Apple could raise its prices, but maintain the same premium over other smartphones.
 
I guess iPhone 18 pro will be a supercycle if people FOMO into the idea that iPhone 19 pro will be $200 more expensive. I’m due for an upgrade anyway, but I can see others forcing an upgrade to avoid a possible price hike. It happened with GPUs in 2025.

Naa...Few people pay enough attention to the phone market to know what's coming up in that sense. Almost my entire office uses an iPhone, and I don't think that more than two people even knows when a new phone is released, and I would surprised if even 1/4 of them could name what model of iPhone they are carrying.

I'm not going to buy the 18 based on any of this. My 16 Pro can easily last until 2030, if not longer, and battery replacements are easy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: klasma
Surely if RAM prices are increasing for Apple, they are increasing much more for the "local smartphone makers" - they order in smaller quantities and seem to use more RAM per phone than Apple has historically? Thus they would have to raise prices too and Apple could raise its prices, but maintain the same premium over other smartphones.
Chinese RAM manufacturers are catching up, and local companies will get better prices, and possibly government subsidies. Furthermore, Chinese RAM may not be directly suitable for integration with Apple’s SoCs.
 
the problem is not AI. It's the fact that it's legal to corner the market with borrowed money. This is analog to misusing patent protection to create a monopoly. Not sure how to solve this but it's been unhealthy for open markets for decades. Leveraged buyouts, buying up land, buying up natural resources and now microchips all on borrowed money that makes it impossible for normal revenue driven businesses to compete. If apple is under pressure because of chip prices what are the chances of independent smaller companies to create innovative products?
 
So with 90-100 Billion in profit each year Apple can't or won't build their own RAM factory? But Tesla/SpaceX can build a state of the art Fab Chip factory in Texas?
 
Well done, AI. You added nothing to society and ruined consumer electronics.

Bra-


-vo
More importantly, they are ruining the environment. Those new data centers won’t run on hope and happiness.

Trickle down energy shortages ahoy. Good old corporations. Passing the fun onto everyone else for a few quid in their coffers.

We’re fecked aren’t we?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.