I have stated it’s my opinion and I have rooted those beliefs in what I see. Apple wasn’t right to go Thunderbolt only as that is a far superior port and far more adaptable. I believe if there were a study among all MBP users, my numbers would actually be high.
Jobs unique, he was a animal on stage. Look at Samsung or Google live events, Jobs was the show.I've been watching old videos of Steve Jobs presenting new products and while everyone wants the return of live events, there was something I noticed ab out Steve that I don't feel with Tim. Steve was very relatable to the common consumer. Instead of just advertising the product, he would relate the product to everyday life. For example, I watched a presentation when he was talking about the Ipod and pointing out how jean pockets have the main pocket, but also another pocket within and asks what that other pocket is for. Then he pulls out the ipod and he had my attention.
I think other than the live presentation, the thing I want Apple to return to is making presentations feel like you are hanging out at the bar and they are showing you something cool. That means having a CEO that knows how to make presentations and is approachable to the average consumer. Federighi is close, but sometimes I think he can be a little over the top, and his Hair has kind of turned into a Meme. That other guy (I forgot his name but his last name starts with a T and I think his first name is John) seems to have a little of that Steve Jobs flair.
I think Cook has done a decent job with Apple and the company has been extremely profitable since. Fresh minds and fresh ideas, though, are needed, especially in this new tech world. I sometimes wonder what kind of things Jobs would introduce if he was still alive because he brought up better ways to listen to music and the Iphone. Tech is always changing and growing and one can always innovate.
I’ve seen a couple Samsung events and they have no personality. It’s boring.Jobs unique, he was an animal on stage. Look at Samsung or Google live events, Jobs was the show.
Tis quite true... Jobs brought us the Intel Macs (as far back as Mac OS X Tiger!)... er, PC's that ran macOS. And Tim Cook brought us BACK to genuine Macs... hardware AND software! Not liking the iOS/macOS blending, but... "Apple will do what Apple will do." As long as the genuine Mac roadmap stays the course, a new face as CEO could be interesting.Cook is OK but he's no Jobs.
IMO Microsoft has never been any good, regardless of CEO.
While I would agree, I think they also need a big shift in the software department.It’s time. John Ternus is a product design guy who has put out some amazing hardware. Apple needs that right now. Tim got the company massive profit but they have lost their soul in recent years.
One of the most overdue things to ever happen at the company - Tim Spindler has to retire.
Apple is preparing for Tim Cook to step down as CEO of the company "as soon as next year," according to the Financial Times.
![]()
The company's board of directors and senior executives "recently intensified preparations for Cook to hand over the reins," the report said.
While the report said that Apple is unlikely to name a new CEO before its next earnings report in late January, it went on to explain that an announcement early in the year would allow for a smooth leadership transition, ahead of Apple's annual developers conference WWDC in June and iPhone event in September.
No final decisions have been made, and the timing could change, the report said.
Cook has been Apple's CEO since August 2011. He turned 65 this year, which is a common age for retirement in the United States, but he has yet to publicly announce any plans to step down. Apple's Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering, John Ternus, is widely viewed as Cook's most likely successor when the time comes.
![]()
Ternus joined Apple in 2001. At 50, he is one of Apple's younger senior executives, so he could potentially have a lengthy run as CEO.
Bloomberg's Mark Gurman pushed back on the report. "I don't get the sense anything is imminent as the [Financial Times] is claiming," he said, in a post today.
In any case, the report said Apple's succession plans are not related to the company's current performance. Apple reported record revenue in the September quarter, and the company expects the current December quarter to be the best quarter in the company's history. In addition, Apple's stock price is near its all-time high.
Article Link: Report: Tim Cook to Step Down as Apple CEO 'as Soon as Next Year'
The only exec with that bold “outside the envelope” vision today is Musk - no one else comes close.Tim is a businessman, not an innovator. They need someone to bring Apple back to innovation. This is what made Apple different from Intel, IBM, Research In Motion, and every other tech competitor since the 1980's. I don't think Apple has ever been so far behind in a technology as they are with Siri and AI integration. Tim did well for shareholders and he was hyper focused on wealth, but Apple is more than that, or at least it was.
Musk is morally bankrupt tho.The only exec with that bold “outside the envelope” vision today is Musk - no one else comes close.
Photo management can be awful even with iCloud+. I've had family members who can't upgrade the OS because they don't have enough free space on their device, and the OS isn't smart enough to remove the local copies of photos that are backed up to iCloud, even though that's a feature Apple advertises.Apple will never really fix it - because it simply wants you to buy iCloud+ or get poor with IAPs.
Sam Tucker joked that iOS is "macOS for babies." Although now that macOS is slowly morphing toward iOS ... it's just baby stuff all around.Honestly, iOS needs to be rebuilt from zero. Too much of painted new versions. Some
Old people may not adapt ok, then limit to newer devices.
I'd argue Apple under Jobs was more influential on the industry and society as a whole than Apple under Cook has been. Profit isn't everything. Jobs understood that.