does anyone know how to go about this?
i just purchased protube 2 and it is not working....
apparently the developer knows and will fix it next week but i would prefer not to wait in limbo....
i'll repurchase again once there is a fix...
does anyone know how to go about this?
i just purchased protube 2 and it is not working....
apparently the developer knows and will fix it next week but i would prefer not to wait in limbo....
i'll repurchase again once there is a fix...
Be patient! If the developer is actively working on it then the fix should be out soon. If you have to get your $1.99 back then contact the developer.
I tried to contact Saurik once to try to get a refund via paypal and never received a response. I simply put a dispute into paypal and he never responded so I won the case and my refund back.
yeah...because you go to store and buy stuff that doesn't work?
like i said ..i'll buy it again once i it is working but i don't make a habit of purchasing stuff that doesn't work...no matter the small amount...
----------
that is what i ended up doing, contacting saurik...
thanks...i will also put in my paypal dispute
thanks...i will also put in my paypal dispute
You're going to cost Saurik money if you do that. For most apps his cut barely covers transaction fees, and you're asking him to make three transactions for a single purchase. This is not some distant corporation you're dealing with, it's people in our community who put in hundreds of hours making these tweaks and providing a platform for you to purchase them. I think you could show a little patience to help them out.
for all of you acting like i shouldn't request a refund -
where is the accountability on the developer to indicate that the app does not work?
like i said i bought this TODAY .....
with the developer full aware that it doesn't work...
shouldn't that be indicated on the buying page?
if that was there then i would not have purchased.
so don't be giving me stuff about fees and such...
how is that my problem?
yall are crazy ...
Well, then, as many of us have recommended, contact the developer and/or file a dispute with Paypal. If I were you, I would just wait patiently as the developer has already acknowledged the issue and is working on a fix.
FWIW, I don't mind if someone files a dispute; in fact, sending a refund as a response to a dispute (I believe even when the dispute is ignored and "lost") is actually cheaper than filing a refund out of the blue, for reasons I don't claim to understand: if you don't get a response from me regarding a refund (and I do often respond to those, although like, right now, picking apart those e-mails is fairly difficult), and if the developer won't give you a refund (which he now has the ability to do himself using the Cydia backend portal), there is no harm in filing a dispute: I don't argue with them on purpose (unless you act like a jerk in the message text and I notice, but you have to be pretty jerk-ish to make me bother ;P) so you get your money back.
That said, if you are filing a refund now and intend to re-purchase it later, that is kind of sketchy, and frankly if Cydia lets you repurchase it at that time, I consider it a low-priority bug (but one I would happily believe that Cydia currently has, as I keep making improvements to the way it detects things like refunds, and thereby may have made it "too good"; it certainly used to be the case that this was disallowed, though): if you get a refund on a product, you aren't supposed to be allowed to buy it again unless you manage to get someone to go out of their way to "clear the previous payment". You really should only be asking for a refund because you don't want the product: not because you temporarily want your $2 back, as described by this person here; the payment mechanism isn't some kind of fluid back/forth transfer system: it should only be used with serious intent.
Regardless, I agree: this product should not be on sale if it doesn't work. I think it is unacceptable that the developer is just all "yeah, it doesn't work, I'll be back in a week" without contacting myself or the repository to put a sales block on the non-functional product. We just tested it, and it in fact doesn't work. (We would have done this sooner, but surprisingly, despite over a thousand recent purchases, there have only been 3 complaints, and those would easily be explainable by local network issues.) That sucks.
So, I've blocked the product from further purchases (which also leaves a note on the depiction saying the product doesn't work, for anyone who already owns it wondering what is up), and this developer is going to be getting a very unhappy e-mail from me, and probably also from his repository (who will probably be even angrier than me, knowing them). I'm also going to be sending everyone who bought the product in the last few days an e-mail later today containing an automated way (a URL they can click) for them to receive a refund, if they want one. Trust me: I do not consider this at all a reasonable state of affairs, and you really shouldn't ever be in the situation where you are buying something that the developer knows doesn't work. 🙁
Question Saurik:
I emailed you for a refund on Auxo and Zephyr because I decided to remove the jailbreak and go back to stock (I jailbroke that morning and went back to stock same day). Would that be a legitimate request? And should I also use Paypal for this?
Don't really care about the money anyway and I'll consider it a donation if the answer is negative, but was just wondering.
FWIW, I don't mind if someone files a dispute; in fact, sending a refund as a response to a dispute (I believe even when the dispute is ignored and "lost") is actually cheaper than filing a refund out of the blue, for reasons I don't claim to understand: if you don't get a response from me regarding a refund (and I do often respond to those, although like, right now, picking apart those e-mails is fairly difficult), and if the developer won't give you a refund (which he now has the ability to do himself using the Cydia backend portal), there is no harm in filing a dispute: I don't argue with them on purpose (unless you act like a jerk in the message text and I notice, but you have to be pretty jerk-ish to make me bother ;P) so you get your money back.
That said, if you are filing a refund now and intend to re-purchase it later, that is kind of sketchy, and frankly if Cydia lets you repurchase it at that time, I consider it a low-priority bug (but one I would happily believe that Cydia currently has, as I keep making improvements to the way it detects things like refunds, and thereby may have made it "too good"; it certainly used to be the case that this was disallowed, though): if you get a refund on a product, you aren't supposed to be allowed to buy it again unless you manage to get someone to go out of their way to "clear the previous payment". You really should only be asking for a refund because you don't want the product: not because you temporarily want your $2 back, as described by this person here; the payment mechanism isn't some kind of fluid back/forth transfer system: it should only be used with serious intent.
Regardless, I agree: this product should not be on sale if it doesn't work. I think it is unacceptable that the developer is just all "yeah, it doesn't work, I'll be back in a week" without contacting myself or the repository to put a sales block on the non-functional product. We just tested it, and it in fact doesn't work. (We would have done this sooner, but surprisingly, despite over a thousand recent purchases, there have only been 3 complaints, and those would easily be explainable by local network issues.) That sucks.
So, I've blocked the product from further purchases (which also leaves a note on the depiction saying the product doesn't work, for anyone who already owns it wondering what is up), and this developer is going to be getting a very unhappy e-mail from me, and probably also from his repository (who will probably be even angrier than me, knowing them). I'm also going to be sending everyone who bought the product in the last few days an e-mail later today containing an automated way (a URL they can click) for them to receive a refund, if they want one. Trust me: I do not consider this at all a reasonable state of affairs, and you really shouldn't ever be in the situation where you are buying something that the developer knows doesn't work. 🙁
Question Saurik:
I emailed you for a refund on Auxo and Zephyr because I decided to remove the jailbreak and go back to stock (I jailbroke that morning and went back to stock same day). Would that be a legitimate request? And should I also use Paypal for this?
Don't really care about the money anyway and I'll consider it a donation if the answer is negative, but was just wondering.
Lets say you bought a bunch of apps from the appstore and then a few days later you decide to sell your iphone and buy an android.
Would you then ask Apple for your money back or try to dispute the charges with Paypal?
That's pretty messed up if you ask me even asking if its cool. It should be common sense to most.
And no, its not a legit reason or request since both those packages work fine with a JB iphone on ios 6.
What you decide to do after with your iphone has nothing to do with the purchase you made and wether you will use it or not.
Give the devs a break and stop acting like that. Its pretty embarrassing IMO.
When I saw this question, I almost said "wow, someone asked about that just a few days ago, and yes: I gave him those refunds"; however, it turns out to be you, and it turns out you hadn't gotten the refunds for some reason (maybe you were one of those e-mails I had open when my client crashed a few days ago). I went ahead and did that now.