3x. Better quality improves Apple's reputation, which is very important. Maybe the lower margins are (at least partially) for higher quality.2x. We outta make an open letter to Steve.
3x. Better quality improves Apple's reputation, which is very important. Maybe the lower margins are (at least partially) for higher quality.2x. We outta make an open letter to Steve.
It may have won the format war, but it lost the content distribution war. This undoubtedly lessens its attractiveness to Jobs who has called the technology an outright failure in this repsect. We will see Blu Ray from Apple, but it will only be in the Mac Pro for starters and will not be introduced for some time.
Internet distribution of True HD content to a large audience currently has too many drawbacks. Broadband infrastructure just isn't there yet and many more ISPs are running into bandwidth bottlenecks hence the move to capped limits or pay per bit provider plans.
Internet distribution of True HD content to a large audience currently has too many drawbacks. Broadband infrastructure just isn't there yet and many more ISPs are running into bandwidth bottlenecks hence the move to capped limits or pay per bit provider plans.
It seems like the infrastructure is there everywhere but America. Seems like a lot of countries(Japan?) have huge pipes and next to no bandwidth limitation. I think its these American ISPs are more obsessed with squeezing every penny they can out of their users.
I don't think that the laptops need any redesign. Not that I own one but still, why change for the sake of it?
A good GPU for the MacBooks would be much needed IMO.
America suffers because the population is spread over an enormous area.
No matter how you cut it, it is going to take a huge cash investment, whether in taxes for government improvement of infrastructure, or in services for free market improvement in infrastructure before high speed broadband is ubiquitous in America.
That is part of the excitement that the spectrum auction was supposed to bring. IIRC that spectrum auctioned did blanket the nation.The other option is that satellite technology or some new tech allows blanketing of the US in ultra-high speed service.
It does seem that expectations for the 9th of September Apple Event are running high. Almost as high as they were for MacWorld.
Shard, I think you are a bit premature to state that Blu-ray lost the content distribution war as this war is only just now starting.
<snip>
Two?!...that makes two of us.A very good thought indeed. You may be onto something. I'll definitely wait and see for what September brings us!![]()
![]()
Very interesting. I am so ready for a (new) MacBook. Studies are starting next week, so hopefully it's introduction won't be too much later.
America suffers because the population is spread over an enormous area.
Most of the current infrastructure is old and won't support high speed broadband over large distances. Many ISP's just use what is offered and have nothing to do with improving the infrastructure.
This is an old argument that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. If it were the primary problem, then one might very well expect to see connections in NYC, LA, Boston, etc. with comparable speed and price to those in Japan.
We don't.
The problem is, indeed, the ridiculously greedy American monopolies who cannot stand the idea of letting a single penny slip through their fingers.
Dan Aris
I don't buy the iMac update. It would be the most insignificant bump in years, unless Apple puts all the high end BTO options into it.
Well some retailers are lowering prices on imacs so it seems something is going on.
Actually, the backbone providers spent a mint during the telecom boom running fiber all over the place to allow for serious data transmission. The chowderheads just never set aside the money necessary to run it the last few miles to homes so when the boom turned to a bust and they all collapsed, nobody was connected.
Here in Seattle Comcast finally hooked us up to these larger pipes so we're now 16MB down, which does help for 720p HD downloads.![]()
Apple very well might update them, but it would seem odd at this time. The Mac Mini, Mac Pro and Cinema Displays all need an update before the iMac.
Apple very well might update them, but it would seem odd at this time. The Mac Mini, Mac Pro and Cinema Displays all need an update before the iMac.
Level of importance to update:
1. Mac Mini
2. Cinema Display
3. Mac Pro
4. iMac
That is what I think.
Is that scale 1 least important, 10 most important... or is it going down on a "Top 10" list w/ #1 as the most important?
I'd say the MacBook/Pro needs to be higher than a Mac Mini.
Is that scale 1 least important, 10 most important... or is it going down on a "Top 10" list w/ #1 as the most important?
I'd say the MacBook/Pro needs to be higher than a Mac Mini.