Depends on the course, level, and device.
I've been teaching (upperclass) Electrical Engineering courses for 25 years, retiring this year, so I've seen lots of changes. However my rules have been consistent.
1. CELL PHONES -- OFF. Just like holding any side conversations during a lecture, it's rude to the instructor and disruptive to the class.
2. COMPUTING DEVICES -- ALLOWED. Actually, required. If they don't come with a notebook computer they need to use a desktop computer provided in the classroom. I'd like to see ownership of a notebook computer a course requirement, but I don't have that sort of control. (It is a requirement in the Computer Science program.)
3. RECORDING DEVICES -- DISCRETION OF INSTRUCTOR. I've always allowed students to make audio or video recordings, and in the past three years I've made recordings of all the class sessions (multicam at that!) and placed them online for student access. But I think it's perfectly reasonable for an instructor to object to recordings as they could be viewed as theft of the instructors intellectual property.
I've been teaching (upperclass) Electrical Engineering courses for 25 years, retiring this year, so I've seen lots of changes. However my rules have been consistent.
1. CELL PHONES -- OFF. Just like holding any side conversations during a lecture, it's rude to the instructor and disruptive to the class.
2. COMPUTING DEVICES -- ALLOWED. Actually, required. If they don't come with a notebook computer they need to use a desktop computer provided in the classroom. I'd like to see ownership of a notebook computer a course requirement, but I don't have that sort of control. (It is a requirement in the Computer Science program.)
3. RECORDING DEVICES -- DISCRETION OF INSTRUCTOR. I've always allowed students to make audio or video recordings, and in the past three years I've made recordings of all the class sessions (multicam at that!) and placed them online for student access. But I think it's perfectly reasonable for an instructor to object to recordings as they could be viewed as theft of the instructors intellectual property.