Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
When Gardner says, the iPad 3 will have "double the resolution" of the iPad 2, doesn't he mean quadruple? I don't think doubling the resolution is as big a problem - quadrupling is a massive difference.

Or have I misunderstood the situation?

It depends how you phrase it. You're DOUBLING the resolution (horizontally and vertically), but you're quadrupling the number of pixels. So both terms are correct.
 
I don't know how I'm going to be able to resist the iPad 3 if these rumors come true.
 
Sounds good to me if it is true at all. However there was a rumor that the A6 is only available in mid summer.

The higher resolution shouldn't be a big problem because even an A5 should be able to scroll a pdf at reasonale speed.

And for games it's not a problem because they can run at 1024x768 as before and just be upsized. They only would be a bit pixelated but that doesn't matter much.

It's the serious applications like photos or reading pdf's with pictures and graphs that need the high res. But those are mostly static and the A5 should handle those just fine.
 
Not true. Samsung's Exynos 5250 will launch in Q2 of next year on 32nm node. If Apple stays with Samsung, they could do the same. Historically, they've launched equally or before comparable Samsung SoCs built on the same node. (A4 beat Hummingbird, A5 beat Exynos 42xx in US launch).



I disagree. That's pushing the power envelope without claiming anything back to save battery. I think the next move is to either shrink the 543 and clock it up or make the jump to Rogue cores.

I don't think a Q1 launch is likely given the availability of 32nm/28nm. Apple is pretty much running the tablet game right now, so I could see a February launch if they prioritized getting a retina iPad over everything else, but the benefits of waiting only a few months for a 28nm/32nm node to ramp up are hard to ignore from a battery standpoint, especially since you're talking about a display that is likely more power hungry.

you've hit the nail right on the head.

That is why the February rumors don't make sense unless one assumes the A6 is just a 28nm version of the A5 and nothing more. If the A6 is a true next gen artechitecture based on the Cortex A15 CPU / Rogue GPU then I wouldn't be surprised if the iPad 3 is released in the summer.

If the iPad 3 does release early next year, I wouldn't be surprised if it is nothing more than an iPad 2 with Retina Display, 1GB of RAM, & LTE capability.
 
Radios? What radios? Most users buy the Wi-Fi versions anyway. I'm still trying to figure out why people need 4G anyway?

Whatever low-power LTE radios were supposed to come out some time in 2012... A wi-fi tablet is a useless tablet (okay, that's my opinion :p) 3G is slow - especially on CDMA carriers.
 
It depends how you phrase it. You're DOUBLING the resolution (horizontally and vertically), but you're quadrupling the number of pixels. So both terms are correct.

Reviewing the national math test scores that just came out, I can see how this my be a hard concept to understand for todays kids.
 
Well surely it's going to need a chip powerful enough to at least play 1080p video and that usually requires something pretty decent.
 
Whatever low-power LTE radios were supposed to come out some time in 2012... A wi-fi tablet is a useless tablet (okay, that's my opinion :p) 3G is slow - especially on CDMA carriers.

How much faster do you think 4G will be in practical use? I think you're in for a broken heart when you finally get it.
 
Who needs 3G on the iPad if you can tether with a smartphone?

Cuz you'd kill your smartphone's battery within hours, and have to connect your iPad/turn on your iPhone whenever you wanted to get on the Internet, thus making the iPad more of a pain than it would be to just use your iPhone?
 
How much faster do you think 4G will be in practical use? I think you're in for a broken heart when you finally get it.

My iPhone 4S on Sprint Vs. my SGSII see's a massive difference. Usually 8-12mbps Vs. 1mbps-600kbps.
 
I can guarantee this rumor is true. I just bought an Ipad 2 yesterday. I'm wondering if I should just return it and wait or use it and sell it when the new one rolls out. Any suggestions?
 
I can guarantee this rumor is true. I just bought an Ipad 2 yesterday. I'm wondering if I should just return it and wait or use it and sell it when the new one rolls out. Any suggestions?

Considering how well the iPads retain their value, I say get the 2 and sell it a few days or a week before they announce the 3.
 
Well surely it's going to need a chip powerful enough to at least play 1080p video and that usually requires something pretty decent.

The A5 processor in the iPad 2 & iPhone 4S can handle 1080p quite nicely actually.
 
Worst rumor for Apple ever. They're already soft on iPad sales. Now ppl won't buy them for the holidays. They'll hold off until early next year to get the iPad3. I'm surprised Apple doesn't pressure MR to pull this post.
 
Radios? What radios? Most users buy the Wi-Fi versions anyway. I'm still trying to figure out why people need 4G anyway?

Because time is money & everyone wants to surf the web as fast as possible, plus 4G data is no more expensive than 3G data.

Worst rumor for Apple ever. They're already soft on iPad sales. Now ppl won't buy them for the holidays. They'll hold off until early next year to get the iPad3. I'm surprised Apple doesn't pressure MR to pull this post.

People obsessed with Apple already know the basic launch periods. This is hardly an informative rumor. Plus people who are gifting can't wait till Feb. Worst case they give an Apple GC. As for Apple pressuring to have the post removed -- there is no secret being exposed here. It's just speculation. Apple can't do anything about that.
 
Last edited:
Sounds good.

Although it should be noted that it WILL be slower than the iPad 2. It'll also take a fair while (1+ year) for most apps to get retina resolutions too for obvious reasons.

Slower???? A year for developers to catch up????? Really? What is this 1992?
 
Waste of processing power and battery. By increasing the resolution it is going to take more processing capacity devoted to the display and that's going to shorten battery life. I would rather have more processing power and more battery life.
 
Cuz you'd kill your smartphone's battery within hours, and have to connect your iPad/turn on your iPhone whenever you wanted to get on the Internet, thus making the iPad more of a pain than it would be to just use your iPhone?

thats what the auto connect is for.

whenever im outside of wifi range and unlock my ipad it auto connects to the iphone without doing anything. not that much of a hussle

plus when isnt wifi avab anyway unless ur stuck in the woods
 
Sprint

My iPhone 4S on Sprint Vs. my SGSII see's a massive difference. Usually 8-12mbps Vs. 1mbps-600kbps.


Are they both on Sprint because my iPhone 4 that is on at&t is usually way faster then "Imbps" I usually average between 2.5 and 4 Mbps with the lowest ever being about 1.5. 4g would be nice but if I'm. It in a 4g area then I wont be to thrilled with paying more $ if they choose to charge more for 4g. I'll ne all on board with the 4g wagon when it's as readily available as 3G is.

Just my two worthless cents.

I will defiantly welcome the new screen though and I really think March is more realistic just due to the fact I feel that February is too close to the holiday season but we will have to wait and see.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.