I am running 12 inch macbook at 1152x720 pixels, which is a 1/4 of native resolution of 2304x1440. I do feel that it makes everything slightly sharper and faster given that no scaling is involved.
Last edited:
Too little workplace for my needs, running mine at 1440x900
How is that relevant to this thread? Maybe I'm missing something.
I've been amazed at how clear the higher resolutions look. I've been quite please with how crisp they look.How is that relevant to this thread? Maybe I'm missing something.
I use 1680x1050 too. At times it seems to make things a bit too small. I think 1536x960 looks a bit better.More so than your reply!
Integer resolutions are the best, but Apple's system does a remarkably good job at making the other resolutions look great. I'm using http://www.pupil.io as a quick resolution switcher, generally at 1680x1050 as I find anything less to require a lot more scrolling than I like. For me the whole point of a high-resolution screen is that elements are sharp enough to allow for a large workspace on a tiny screen. 1152x720 is less real estate than I was using 10 years ago!
I'm all for keeping threads on track, but what exactly do you expect for a reply when the OP started a thread to simply state they like X resolution? Not too much more to say other than offer an opinion of what resolution we like.How is that relevant to this thread? Maybe I'm missing something.
Technically, there is always scaling involved. What you're referring to is essentially integer scaling - there's no interpolation between native resolution and the scaled resolution.I do feel that it makes everything slightly sharper and faster given that no scaling is involved.