Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What it means is Thunderbolt can currently run a DisplayPort 1.2 capable monitor but not at max resolution. DisplayPort 1.2 passthrough will be part of the 2013 Thunderbolt chips, which is when we are most likely to see Quad Full HD Cinema Displays

Whatever. Even if HDMI can give you full resolution, I refuse to use it over Thunderbolt.

Cuz Thunderbolt's the future.
 
In this config the mbp will have to run gt650m card, as hd4000 supports only 3 displays. So it will eat power much faster.

And so far, kepler videocards supports up to 4 displays

If you're at a desk with three external monitors, then plugging in the MBP shouldn't be a problem...
 
I wonder how many people that buy these will also buy three Cinema Displays?

Perhaps this guy.

macbook-pro-with-dual-cinema-displays.jpeg
 
Once I saw this on MR I knew I just had to try it at the office. Lo and behold, works for the 27” ACDs (non-Thunderbolt) and 24” broadcast monitor in my office.

I almost felt a little woozy, swiping from desktop to desktop on all four displays taking up most of my forward view.
 
The gpu for that retina macbook pro is said to be able to power at least 8 monitors at full 1080p.
 
This is seriously awesome. If Apple updates their MacMini with two thunderbolt and HDMI + HD4000, I can retire my old MacPro. I could save some serious dough by doing a MacMini plus a few TB or USB3 external HDDs instead of buying another MacPro. My workflow requires a minimum of 3 screens.
 
Yay!

YAY! Now every time we swipe a to a fullscreen app we can stare at 3 monitors showing a useless grey background.

HAHA

3 x useless still = useless.

I love fullscreen apps and need 2 monitors every day at work.
I just can't have both.

:(
 
Mission Control needs to change.

I concur with the people who have pointed out the uselessness of external displays with fullscreen apps (that aren't designed for multiple displays).

Come on, Apple. The Mission Control UI is broken. Fix it.

We should be able to switch desktops for each monitor separately. Heck, it would be nice to move desktops from display to display, if the displays had the same resolution (or even if they didn't, perhaps by telling fullscreen apps to leave and re-enter fullscreen mode).

I'd like to keep a development VM on one screen, while switching between references on another... but as it stands now, I can't.

EDIT: To be fair, the same was true in Spaces, though I could have a full-screen app on one monitor and still use the other.
 
Last edited:
iMacs support video in as well as out... So you can hook up an external device and use the iMac display. I believe any iMac with a Mini DisplayPort (or now Thunderbolt Port) has this capability.

Any 27" iMac can be used as an external display with a MiniDisplay or Thunderbolt port. However, one can only use the iMac 21.5" with Thunderbolt port as an external display.
 
Something else I realized:

Does this require native Thunderbolt displays, or can I use MDP-to-DVI/VGA adapters to hook up two externals to the TB ports, along with HDMI?
 
[/COLOR]
Actually it was introduced even a bit earlier, in October 2008 with the Al-unibody 13" MB and the 15" MBP, the 17" MBP took a bit longer and went unibody and fixed battery in early 2009 as you said.



This is getting a bit off topic, but this is incorrect. I am on my Late 2008 Aluminum unibody MacBook right now and it has a user replaceable battery. I can't comment on the 15" MBP, but since it was released at the same time I would guess it is the same. I think the previous poster was correct.
 

Attachments

  • replacement-battery-for-macbook-pro-late-2008-unibody-2-300x225.jpg
    replacement-battery-for-macbook-pro-late-2008-unibody-2-300x225.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 725
iMacs support video in as well as out... So you can hook up an external device and use the iMac display. I believe any iMac with a Mini DisplayPort (or now Thunderbolt Port) has this capability.

but nobody will do that. why won't you use the iMac itself it is is more powerful than your other computer.
 
but nobody will do that. why won't you use the iMac itself it is is more powerful than your other computer.

Maybe if the MBP is set up with the apps you need, while the iMac isn't?

Nobody said that you necessarily own both machines. Particularly in academia, there are such things as 'computer labs'. (Though I have to admit that using a lab machine as a display can be uncouth, if there are people waiting...)
 
Maybe if the MBP is set up with the apps you need, while the iMac isn't?

Nobody said that you necessarily own both machines. Particularly in academia, there are such things as 'computer labs'. (Though I have to admit that using a lab machine as a display can be uncouth, if there are people waiting...)

opps, i overlook this point.

speaking of that, i always bring around a vga with me and plug into the display in my school lab.
 
Here's what I'd like to see: a Thunderbolt dongle or dock that has two DVI or DP or mini DP ports so I can use the perfectly good external displays I have already to do external dual displays on a Thunderbolt MacBook Air or Pro.

Thats what I'd like to see too. I just ordered a 17 inch MBP and want to use a Blackmagic Intensity Extreme and an external display at the same time but unfortunately can't.
 
How is it possible to simultaneously run four screens at once whilst playing a video on each and it not be possible to scroll properly/run mission control in scaled mode!?
 
Thunderbolt: a single connection to rule them all. Soon on iOS besides the current Mac. REVOLUTIONARY!
 
I don't care if you need it or not, or the thing gets to hot. Just the fact that it's possible is pretty damn cool:)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.