Renzatic
Suspended
Whatever. Even if HDMI can give you full resolution, I refuse to use it over Thunderbolt.
Cuz Thunderbolt's the future.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Retina MacBook Pro Can Run Three External Displays Simultaneously
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Whatever. Even if HDMI can give you full resolution, I refuse to use it over Thunderbolt.
Cuz Thunderbolt's the future.
Demosthenes X
macrumors 68000
If you're at a desk with three external monitors, then plugging in the MBP shouldn't be a problem...
linux2mac
macrumors 65816
killmoms
macrumors 68040
Once I saw this on MR I knew I just had to try it at the office. Lo and behold, works for the 27 ACDs (non-Thunderbolt) and 24 broadcast monitor in my office.
I almost felt a little woozy, swiping from desktop to desktop on all four displays taking up most of my forward view.
I almost felt a little woozy, swiping from desktop to desktop on all four displays taking up most of my forward view.
AppleScruff1
macrumors G4
My question wasn't who. It was how many. I'm thinking that someone who needed 3 displays would lean more toward a Mac Pro. Much better cooling and stronger graphics card.
The gpu for that retina macbook pro is said to be able to power at least 8 monitors at full 1080p.
Ozy
macrumors regular
This is seriously awesome. If Apple updates their MacMini with two thunderbolt and HDMI + HD4000, I can retire my old MacPro. I could save some serious dough by doing a MacMini plus a few TB or USB3 external HDDs instead of buying another MacPro. My workflow requires a minimum of 3 screens.
Yay!
YAY! Now every time we swipe a to a fullscreen app we can stare at 3 monitors showing a useless grey background.
HAHA
3 x useless still = useless.
I love fullscreen apps and need 2 monitors every day at work.
I just can't have both.
🙁
YAY! Now every time we swipe a to a fullscreen app we can stare at 3 monitors showing a useless grey background.
HAHA
3 x useless still = useless.
I love fullscreen apps and need 2 monitors every day at work.
I just can't have both.
🙁
haruhiko
macrumors 604
Mission Control needs to change.
I concur with the people who have pointed out the uselessness of external displays with fullscreen apps (that aren't designed for multiple displays).
Come on, Apple. The Mission Control UI is broken. Fix it.
We should be able to switch desktops for each monitor separately. Heck, it would be nice to move desktops from display to display, if the displays had the same resolution (or even if they didn't, perhaps by telling fullscreen apps to leave and re-enter fullscreen mode).
I'd like to keep a development VM on one screen, while switching between references on another... but as it stands now, I can't.
EDIT: To be fair, the same was true in Spaces, though I could have a full-screen app on one monitor and still use the other.
I concur with the people who have pointed out the uselessness of external displays with fullscreen apps (that aren't designed for multiple displays).
Come on, Apple. The Mission Control UI is broken. Fix it.
We should be able to switch desktops for each monitor separately. Heck, it would be nice to move desktops from display to display, if the displays had the same resolution (or even if they didn't, perhaps by telling fullscreen apps to leave and re-enter fullscreen mode).
I'd like to keep a development VM on one screen, while switching between references on another... but as it stands now, I can't.
EDIT: To be fair, the same was true in Spaces, though I could have a full-screen app on one monitor and still use the other.
Last edited:
AidenShaw
macrumors P6
It looks like the keyboard and a boatload of other cables are connected to the left monitor, which would make me wonder if the left one is an Imac....
conradwt
macrumors member
Any 27" iMac can be used as an external display with a MiniDisplay or Thunderbolt port. However, one can only use the iMac 21.5" with Thunderbolt port as an external display.
Something else I realized:
Does this require native Thunderbolt displays, or can I use MDP-to-DVI/VGA adapters to hook up two externals to the TB ports, along with HDMI?
Does this require native Thunderbolt displays, or can I use MDP-to-DVI/VGA adapters to hook up two externals to the TB ports, along with HDMI?
This is getting a bit off topic, but this is incorrect. I am on my Late 2008 Aluminum unibody MacBook right now and it has a user replaceable battery. I can't comment on the 15" MBP, but since it was released at the same time I would guess it is the same. I think the previous poster was correct.
Attachments
but nobody will do that. why won't you use the iMac itself it is is more powerful than your other computer.
Maybe if the MBP is set up with the apps you need, while the iMac isn't?
Nobody said that you necessarily own both machines. Particularly in academia, there are such things as 'computer labs'. (Though I have to admit that using a lab machine as a display can be uncouth, if there are people waiting...)
opps, i overlook this point.
speaking of that, i always bring around a vga with me and plug into the display in my school lab.
That's why I bought the MDP-to-VGA adapter first; all the projectors at school have VGA hookups, not DVI.
Renzatic
Suspended
Nope. It's not an iMac. The bezel is perfectly even around the screen.
Sorta looks like there's a Mac Mini behind it, though.
InuNacho
macrumors 68010
Thats what I'd like to see too. I just ordered a 17 inch MBP and want to use a Blackmagic Intensity Extreme and an external display at the same time but unfortunately can't.
Thunderbolt: a single connection to rule them all. Soon on iOS besides the current Mac. REVOLUTIONARY!
I don't care if you need it or not, or the thing gets to hot. Just the fact that it's possible is pretty damn cool🙂