Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

wiznet

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 30, 2012
165
1
Canada
Wait - so judging by what I've been seeing here - you can't run at 2880 x 1800 on OSX? Or "native resolution"? Somebody help me out with this... what's the deal?

Why would they advertise a resolution you can't even use? Or am I just taking things the wrong way ( long day ) ...
 
In all of the software scaled options, you're using all 2880x1800 pixels.

The default option has the equivalent "real estate" to a 1440x900 display, but much sharper since you're actually running at 2880x1800. There are also options to increase or decrease the effective "real estate" through software scaling:

Screen%20Shot%202012-06-11%20at%204.29.36%20PM_575px.png


To recap, Retina Display MBP owners now get a slider under OS X's Display Preferences that allow you to specify desktop resolutions other than 1440 x 900. At 1440 x 900 you don't get any increase in usable desktop resolution compared to a standard 15-inch MacBook Pro, but everything is ridiculously crisp.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/5998/macbook-pro-retina-display-analysis
 
But the OP is right, the highest "classical" resolution is 1920x1200... you can not run it such that you get the work space of a 2880x1800 screen - except if you install windows on it ;)
 
But the OP is right, the highest "classical" resolution is 1920x1200... you can not run it such that you get the work space of a 2880x1800 screen - except if you install windows on it ;)

Or disable HiDPI mode manually. That would give you 2880x1800 worth of real estate with tiny UI elements and text.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.