Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's strange. Apple's main page and several of the pages (including the MacBook Pro page) look crystal clear on mine.
Try Store tab. Someone at the other thread said:

I go to Apple.com, while it is loading the main page, it is pixelated, but then it recovers and gets crisp. I wish that it stays like that, I click on the Store tab, and BAMMM, all images of products are pixelated :(
 
This thread is a bit misleading.

High res "pictures" look stunning on the rMBP. TRUE
Low dpi pictures on websites look pixelated. TRUE
"pictures" look pixelated on the rMBP. FALSE

Personally, I don't care. If I wanted a computer best suited for browsing low res "pictures" on the web, I wouldn't buy any mbp flavor.

Edit: Not to mention the adjectives "Pixelated" and "Blurred" are misleading. They look slightly worse than on a standard display. Those adjectives conjure up mental images of "Kings Quest" on a Tandy 1000. A lot of people wouldn't even notice the difference if they were not looking for it.
 
Running 2880 x 1800 has a side benefit. Firefox lets you 'dress up' the UI with skins (it calls them Personas). Lots of them aren't designed for screen sizes past 2560 pixels wide, so those skins will show an abrupt break on the upper left corner with a full size window.
 
I went to an Apple store for the first time since this was announced and I honestly dont notice a difference between this screen and the old ones. Everything looks the same to me and Im not seeing the improvement. The main attraction of this is the size but the screen really didnt mean anything for me
 
Running 2880 x 1800 has a side benefit. Firefox lets you 'dress up' the UI with skins (it calls them Personas). Lots of them aren't designed for screen sizes past 2560 pixels wide, so those skins will show an abrupt break on the upper left corner with a full size window.

Forgive me if I'm wrong... but we can't actually run 2880 x 1800 can we? I mean... 1920 x 1200 is the highest resolution. It's scaled down from 2880 x 1800, but it's still 1920 x 1200?

Or am I actually on 2880 x 1800, but I'm seeing scaling that imitates 1920 x 1200? gah.
 
Forgive me if I'm wrong... but we can't actually run 2880 x 1800 can we? I mean... 1920 x 1200 is the highest resolution. It's scaled down from 2880 x 1800, but it's still 1920 x 1200?

Or am I actually on 2880 x 1800, but I'm seeing scaling that imitates 1920 x 1200? gah.

Try SwitchResX, the first thing that needs installing on a new MBPr. You can then select from several resolutions including 2880x1400 (which is non-HiDPI, i.e. 1 pixel on a website equals 1 pixel on the screen), and even higher with downscaling, up to 3840x2800
 
Try SwitchResX, the first thing that needs installing on a new MBPr. You can then select from several resolutions including 2880x1400 (which is non-HiDPI, i.e. 1 pixel on a website equals 1 pixel on the screen), and even higher with downscaling, up to 3840x2800
Edit: Paragraphs removed due to new understanding of ppi

Hmm... I worry that if I have a resolution any more dense than 1920 x 1200 I'll start struggling to read the text. I'll give it a go because I want to be able to see what it's like.
 
Last edited:
Might not be noticable to everyone, but I was standing at my normal distance away from the rMBP and the drop in picture quality is VERY noticable to me. I'm able to detect the blurness just going to google.com and glancing at the Google logo. The fact that all the elements around it are extremely crisp and sharp only makes it look even worse in contrast.
I would suggest that the problem isn't that it is blurry, but rather that it isn't as blurry as it is on the monitors we're more familiar with. With more space between pixels and larger pixels representing color, everything smooths out a little. A certain level of JPG compression vanishes into the background. On the RMBP the pixels are rendered more crisply and blemishes (such as the compression artifacts in a JPG graphic stand out more). Although if a graphic is resampled at higher dimensions that would introduce an element of blurriness. I'll have to check that out.

If you feel that crisp text is worth the trade off, then that's your decision and I'm not going to try to convince you otherwise. However as for me, I've never had a problem with text being too blur, and hence I'm not willing to sacrifice picture quality for sharper text.
Yeah, no point trying to convince me. Trying to change someone's mind is a fool's errand on the internet. Better just to share opinions and impressions and have a good conversation.

I value text more because it is the primary vessel for conveying useful information in most mediums. And I would argue that crisper text does a better job of conveying information (relative to the computer text we have grown accustomed to) than an image's ability to convey information is reduced by the small perceived quality loss of viewing it at a higher resolution than it was sized for (at least in this case—that statement would not be accurate in all cases). Icons lose more than other graphics, but the likes of a photograph loses nothing meaningful (but does have everything to gain).

And there's no way this is a temporary thing. For the iPad and iPhone, all apps are designed for specifically iOS and hence most get updated eventually as all iOS devices shift to the higher resolution. However websites cater to the entire world, and there's no easy way to optimize it for Retina MBPs without breaking it for everyone else.
Websites will be optimized as screens like this become more common place (and increasingly more in newly designed professional websites). And make no mistake—high resolution screens are the future.

The later statement—that this can't be done without breaking things for everyone else—is incorrect. I'm a web designer and I've already thought of (and put to practice) numerous techniques to do just this. And before long the design community as a whole will form best practices for just these tasks which are easier to implement and degrade flawlessly.

Also FYI, even the Apple website with the pictures of the Retina MBP look awful when viewing it on one.
Just to humor you, I checked, and that's complete nonsense. They look incredible, just as one would expect from a properly sized high resolution graphic on this display (aside from that moment when you see the lower resolution variant before the high resolution swap out).

Are you using Safari? If you're using, say, Chrome, you won't see high resolution anything and everything will look a little crap (unless you're using one of the dev builds with Retina support).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.