Do you think eventually they will come out with a stand alone monitor with the retina display? I was debating on getting the Thunderbolt monitor, but don't want to purchase it and in 6 months have them come out with that.
Do you think eventually they will come out with a stand alone monitor with the retina display? I was debating on getting the Thunderbolt monitor, but don't want to purchase it and in 6 months have them come out with that.
I think the highest they'd ever go would be 2880 x 1800 native resolution. A 4k resolution consumer monitor doesn't make sense.
"Ever" is a big word ... We will see Retina/4K iMacs and Thunderbolt displays eventually. When will Apple double the resolution - in one year? In two years? In four years? Who knows. But they will come.
As mentioned above, Sharp are pushing 4k screens this year. Not everyone agrees there is a point
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/06/4k-tvs-are-coming-but-they-face-an-uphill-battle-in-the-home/
True. I'm looking at this though through a consumer standpoint, though. It would be nice, but we are barely breaking out of the 1080p resolution "era". I agree with CASLondon in the sense that it could be years. That was what I was really getting at."Ever" is a big word ... We will see Retina/4K iMacs and Thunderbolt displays eventually. When will Apple double the resolution - in one year? In two years? In four years? Who knows. But they will come.
True. I'm looking at this though through a consumer standpoint, though. It would be nice, but we are barely breaking out of the 1080p resolution "era". I agree with CASLondon in the sense that it could be years. That was what I was really getting at.
A 4K 27" screen would offer about a 172ppi resolution.
The current Apple 27" screens offer around a 109ppi resolution.
My 65" plasma is only around 34ppi...
Sharp is coming out with a 31.5 inch 4K screen.
Soon.